James and Cumbo Wilt Under Pressure, Oppose Clinton Ave Bikeway

DOT wants to give Clinton Avenue in Brooklyn a two-way protected bike lane. Image: DOT
The proposed street redesign creates space for a two-way protected bike lane by removing the southbound traffic lane on Clinton Avenue. Image: DOT

Last year, Public Advocate Tish James called on DOT to make protected bike lanes a standard feature of street redesigns, a stance she recently elaborated on in an interview with Streetsblog. In December, Council Member Laurie Cumbo stood with the family of Victoria Nicodemus, who was run over and killed on a Fort Greene sidewalk, at a vigil for safer streets.

Now DOT is making a concrete proposal to redesign a street in Cumbo’s district for greater safety [PDF] — a plan for a two-way protected bike lane on Clinton Avenue first floated at the “Vision Zero town hall” Cumbo convened after the vigil for Nicodemus. But James and Cumbo have folded under pressure from street redesign opponents, coming out against the project at a public meeting last night. If Brooklyn Community Board 2’s transportation committee endorses the redesign when it reconvenes on Thursday, it won’t be thanks to leadership from James or Cumbo.

Public Advocate Tish James
Public Advocate Tish James

More than 250 people attended last night’s CB 2 meeting. Opponents outnumbered supporters among people who testified, but fewer than a third of the 90 people who signed up got a turn at the mic. The committee will reconvene at the Brown Memorial Church on Thursday to allow for more public comment, then vote on the plan.

The redesign would convert Clinton between Flushing Avenue and Gates Avenue from two-way motor vehicle flow to one-way northbound with a two-way, parking-protected bike lane on the east side. Crossing distances for pedestrians would be significantly shorter, and concrete islands would encourage motorists to take right turns more carefully. The design would be very similar to the two-way protected bike lane on Kent Avenue, but with more pedestrian islands and more frequent intersections.

Last night was DOT’s first public presentation of the full project, but in April the agency had met with local residents’ associations, schools, and employers about the proposal, and sent staffers to get the word out in the neighborhood. At the same time, some property owners on Clinton Avenue were mobilizing and collecting 1,300 signatures against the project.

James and Cumbo clearly had those signatures in mind as they attempted to reconcile their stated positions on Vision Zero and protected bike lanes with their opposition to this project.

James, who represented the district before Cumbo, highlighted her past support for bike infrastructure before proposing a “compromise” where Clinton Avenue would remain two-way and have a “shared bike lane” in both directions. Echoing flyers that had been circulating in the neighborhood, James argued that repurposing one lane of car travel to make room for the bikeway would “cause noise [and] air pollution and possible medical emergencies due to traffic delays.”

Cumbo, meanwhile, couched her opposition in terms of process. “I’m in opposition to this project because of the process, and I feel that a process is critical and important,” she told the audience. “The process in terms of how this was brought forward has created such an adversarial environment around it that we simply can’t move forward with the plan as it has been presented to us.”

Neither James’s suggestion of striping sharrows nor Cumbo’s proposal to assemble a new planning committee, however, would solve the problems that the protected bikeway is intended to address.

There are currently no north-south protected bike lanes in the neighborhood. Lauren Davis was hit and killed on her bike by a driver last month while riding on Classon Avenue, a few blocks east of Clinton. While Vanderbilt Avenue is a parallel, direct connection between Atlantic Avenue and Flushing, most of that stretch only provides sharrows for the 1,900 people who bike on it each day. “A lot of people don’t feel comfortable on the shared lanes on Vanderbilt and we’re trying to address that with the project,” said DOT’s Ted Wright.

While Clinton is less direct than Vanderbilt, Wright said putting the bike lane on Clinton would be less disruptive for motor vehicle traffic.

At the southern end of the project, cyclists would be routed onto a block of sharrows on Gates connecting to Vanderbilt, which has striped lanes from that point south. Pedestrian islands would be added at eight intersections, shortening crossing distances. About 35 parking spots would be removed.

All of these design elements have been shown to reduce traffic injuries on NYC streets, and a very similar design has been in place for years on Kent Avenue in North Williamsburg, but speakers repeatedly said the project would endanger seniors. While many opponents were homeowners who’ve seen their property values soar in recent years, another common line of attack was to conflate the redesign with gentrification.

CB 2 Chair Shirley McRae chastised DOT for not having data on how many people reached by DOT before the meeting were residents of Clinton Avenue.

“The people who have lived [here] all their lives, or for many many years, are the ones who have created a caring community,” said Fort Greene resident Lucy Koteen (a former CB 2 member), who argued that the redesign would make elderly residents of Clinton Avenue unsafe. “We are seeing what feels like an invasion by those who have not invested in the area with their time, their money and with their hearts, but seek out changes without regards to the needs of long-term residents.”

A meeting on Thursday night will pick up where last night’s left off. People who didn’t sign up to speak yesterday will be able to get on the list, but there may not be time for them to speak. It all gets started at 6 p.m. at the Fellowship Hall of Brown Memorial Church.

  • Jared R

    Clearly that doesn’t work.

  • Jared R

    The next time Tish James attends a vigil for someone killed by motorist violence, someone should ask “WHY ARE YOU HERE?!”

  • BrandonWC

    Maybe so bikers going the other way can make left turns?

  • Well, he’ll need you. I think it’s going to be wide open.

    I still think that James will run. And I still think that, despite this misstep, she’ll seek to position herself as the stronger defender of bicycle infrastructure.

  • ExoKen

    I’d love to know how long the people who are Pro-Bike Lane have lived in Brooklyn or NYC period. I’m willing to bet not much longer than 5 or 6 years. They have no connection to, nor any real love for this neighborhood. Most probably wouldn’t be able to point out East Flatbush or Canarsie on a map…maybe one day if there’s an Artisanal Bagel Shop or Cat Cafe out there.

  • I am very pro-bike lane and have lived in NYC since the day I was born. This is such a bad point you’re trying to make.

  • Give me a break. No one has a monopoly on loving a neighborhood.

  • Vooch

    since 1978 with a couple of periods of exile West of the Hudson, but always kept a residence in the City. Also been commuter cycling in the City since 1978

  • To make them more visible to drivers. You’ll see they daylighted those intersections so they have the cyclists move over towards where the car would be parked. It looks a little weird, but a nice extra feature to alert drivers.

  • Morris Zapp

    “How long have you lived here?”

    The argument to make when you have no argument.

  • Reader

    If I’m interpreting your comment correctly, the longer I live here the less I’ll care about people getting hit by cars. Is that right?

  • Joe R.

    All of my 53 years other than 5 semesters of college. I lived in Brooklyn until I was 3 or 4, Astoria until I was 15, and Flushing ever since. You’re painting people who like to bike as newcomer hipsters. That couldn’t be further from the truth. I was doing bike errands up to 20 miles each way in the early 1980s. I’ve been riding since 1978 (longer if you count when I was a kid).

  • Geck

    Your question does not really deserve this response but 32 years in NYC and 28 years in Brooklyn.

  • Tower18

    Well, I don’t know what to say except thank you for proving my point.

    It’s so sad to see legitimate debates about public policy reduced to us vs. them debates using coded speech.

  • c2check

    So lots of loading happening on Kent, though, no? Plus probably a good deal of taxis etc picking up e.g. bar or smorgarburg patrons along the corridor. Seems like it should suggest that Clinton Ave NIMBY qualms about loading and deliveries don’t hold much water

  • Inspector Spacetime

    My family’s lived here in the city for at least 130 years. I support the bike lanes because I made an effort to understand the purpose and the likely end result and how it will drive a change in behavior for bikers, drivers and pedestrians, and it’ll be for the better for most. I don’t even own a bike.

    I graduated from public school. My parents are poor. I’m not white. I live in Clinton Hill; my young kids are 5th generation New Yorkers. I can point out East Flatbush. I dated a girl rom Canarsie when we were in high school. I’ve been paying city taxes since I was 14. Am i legitimate enough to have an opinion or is yours still more important because we disagree?

  • JarekFA

    This would’ve enhanced their property values too.


Family of Victoria Nicodemus: Get Reckless Drivers Off NYC Streets

The family of Victoria Nicodemus is calling on NYPD to do more to get reckless drivers off city streets. Nicodemus died last December when Marlon Sewell struck her with his SUV on a Fort Greene sidewalk, in a crash that injured two other pedestrians. Sewell, whose driving record reportedly includes incidents of unlicensed driving and speeding in school zones, […]

DOT Defers Action on Clinton Avenue Bikeway

DOT has deferred its plan for a two-way protected bike lane on Clinton Avenue, saying it will return to Brooklyn Community Board 2 next month. The department’s decision was announced by CB 2 transportation chair John Dew at the beginning of last night’s committee meeting. The committee had initially intended to finish hearing comments from people who didn’t […]