Harlem’s CB 10 Continues Assault on Safer Streets and Better Buses

This modest change to Morningside Avenue is too radical for Community Board 10. Will it be too radical for Bill de Blasio’s DOT? Image: NYC DOT

According to Harlem’s Community Board 10, there is apparently no such thing as a street redesign worth pursuing. Over the course of two-and-a-half hours Tuesday night, members of the board’s transportation committee declined to support a road diet for Morningside Avenue, attacked a community-based street safety plan installed on Mount Morris Park West, and asked DOT to reconsider Select Bus Service on 125th Street again — this time on the pretense that it would harm the elderly and disabled.

The ongoing dysfunction at CB 10 should be a wake-up call to Mayor-elect Bill de Blasio, who has promised at least 20 Bus Rapid Transit routes and set a goal of eliminating traffic fatalities in 10 years. As it currently stands, New York’s community board process is incompatible with those goals, since in effect it enables a small group of people to veto changes to the street, sometimes without any meaningful community involvement. Community boards can be venues for constructive feedback and criticism, but too often they are simply forums to say “no” to change.

Each community board is supposed to represent the interests of people who live in the district — upwards of 100,000 people per board. In the CB 10 district, the vast majority of those people don’t own cars and rely on walking and transit. On Tuesday, there were just four committee members in the room, most of them threatening the cancellation of safety improvements proposed for Morningside Avenue, criticizing other traffic calming projects, and complaining about bus enhancements on 125th Street.

The Morningside Avenue redesign, requested by the North Star Neighborhood Association, has already been vetted at a public forum jointly hosted by Community Boards 9 and 10, which both cover the project area. CB 9 has already passed a resolution in support of the plan. Tuesday night, Karen Horry, acting chair of the CB 10 transportation committee, said she was surprised that CB 9’s resolution [PDF] did not ask DOT to reconsider the road diet, which is the centerpiece of the plan. “The community has a great deal of concern about the lane reductions, so we were hoping you could address alternatives,” she said to Josh Orzeck, representing DOT’s Manhattan borough commissioner’s office at the meeting.

Horry said she spoke with CB 9 transportation committee chair Carolyn Thompson, who she said is redrafting the resolution to include a section opposing lane reductions and putting it up for a vote again. (Streetsblog’s attempts to contact Thompson have been unsuccessful.)

A number of people testifying before the committee Tuesday night urged DOT to include bike lanes on Morningside Avenue. The plan includes extra-wide parking lanes instead, which provide space for both bike riders and double-parked drivers. “We’re not averse to putting in bike lanes,” Orzeck said. “The reason it’s not automatically thought about is because it’s not a natural bicycle route.” Later in the meeting, committee member Stephanie Howze said that while she opposed lane reductions, CB 10’s resolution should include a request for bike lanes on Morningside because of the public testimony in support of them.

But there was no vote on a resolution: Because only four committee members were in attendance, there was no quorum. The issue now goes before CB 10’s executive committee, which has the option of putting it on the agenda for the next full board meeting.

Morningside Avenue wasn’t the only traffic calming plan discussed Tuesday night. The committee also requested an update from DOT on complaints about traffic calming on Adam Clayton Powell Jr. Boulevard; the agency said there had been only two 311 complaints about the redesign since August 2012. “The complaint was that the new markings cause congestion and make it harder to drive,” Orzeck said. “Our data doesn’t prove that out.”

DOT provided an update on street design changes it made at 135th Street and Madison Avenue and along Fifth Avenue from 142nd to 132nd Streets, which have reduced injuries for all road users by 29 percent. The total number of crashes are down 9 percent, and crashes with injuries are down 14 percent. Board members didn’t seem to care much about the improved safety record. “That data sounds impressive, but as a person that drives down that street every day, I can tell you it’s backed up,” Howze said. “It’s just a lot of confusion.”

Committee members also said that DOT should completely scrap its traffic calming project on Mount Morris Park West. Local residents wanted to slow down speeding drivers racing around park corners; after working with DOT, they agreed on a plan that was supported  CB 11’s transportation committee. After the city implemented the changes, other residents pressured DOT into modifying the project by adjusting traffic signals, reducing the size of the pedestrian space, and widening parking and travel lanes. But these adjustments weren’t enough for neighbors who have formed a group dedicated to reversing the changes. Paul and Susan Huck live near Mount Morris Park West and spoke at Tuesday’s meeting. They want the agency to bring back two lanes of traffic, including around turns at 120th and 124th Streets, and install heavy-duty bollards at 120th Street to keep speeding drivers from crashing into homes at the southern end of the park.

CB 10 members also accused the Select Bus Service plan proposed for 125th Street of discriminating against the elderly and disabled, because stops for the M60 would be located on every other block. (Local buses would continue to serve all stops on each block.) “Our concern is that the elderly and disabled are not getting sufficient access,” Horry said. “It’s mind-boggling why you would reduce the number of stops.”

In addition to off-board fare collection and dedicated bus lanes, limiting the number of stops is a component of Select Bus Service that aims to speed bus trips on 125th Street, which are often slower than walking. Orzeck said he wouldn’t make any promises about DOT making changes in response to the committee. In October, DOT and the MTA announced that the project was on track for implementation next year after being temporarily shelved due to objections from local elected officials and community boards, including CB 10.

Community board members are appointed by borough presidents, and many are nominated for consideration by council members. In Manhattan, the community board application review process has already been launched by Borough President Scott Stringer and will be completed by incoming Borough President Gale Brewer, with terms beginning in April 2014.

For his part, de Blasio has cited “the need for outreach extending beyond the community board.” That could mean any number of things. Hopefully, it will entail a complete overhaul of the dysfunctional process exemplified by CB 10 Tuesday night.

  • alexblac


  • Albert

    Yet the poor showing—only 4 members of the committee showing up—is vivid, useful & compelling evidence that this committee, if not the full board itself, needs to be replaced—evidence that Gale Brewer et al will find hard to ignore. So, maybe not so depressing for the near future.

  • Eric McClure

    Apparently, the members of Community Board 10 hate cities, and the people who walk in them.

  • JK

    Put another way: “The ongoing dysfunction at CB 10 should be a wake-up call to Manhattan Borough President Elect Gale Brewer.” It’s hard for actual humans who live in the boundaries of CB 10 — AKA members of the community, to get excited about showing up to meetings of a CB that has been horrible on livable streets issues for decades. This board is dominated by political cronies and apparatchiks representing the dozens of state and city social service and economic development agencies located in Harlem: they drive from New Rochelle and points north. First step is to change the rules so you have to live in the CB, and term limit the CB members. It’s a chicken/egg problem, because you’re not going to get 100 livable streets supporters to go to five meetings in a row.

  • I had an errand on Friday that took me up to 125th street for the first time. I went by bike up the Hudson River Greenway, then along 125th street. I think I can safely say that, in a strong field, it’s just about the most dysfunctional street I’ve encountered in New York City. That anyone would want to leave it as it is is astonishing.

  • Mark Walker

    “They want the agency to bring back two lanes of traffic, including around turns at 120th and 124th Streets, and install heavy-duty bollards at 120th Street to keep speeding drivers from crashing into homes at the southern end of the park.” I’d laugh if it weren’t so tragic. Hey, I’m all for bollards, but street designs that make them unnecessary are a big step up. Also, the CB’s role is strictly advisory, and DOT shouldn’t hesitate to make changes when safety is an issue. Finally, take a closer look at JK’s comment below — he’s figured out what’s really going on here. It’s compounded by the perception that driving is a social promotion, a perception that already looks archaic and will only grow more so.

  • Ben Kintisch

    yup. When I lived in Harlem I went to a couple of CB 10 transportation committee meetings. It was so dismal, so boring, so “let’s not change a thing anywhere anyhow” that I never wanted to go again.

  • KeNYC2030

    It would be instructive to know how many CB10 members live outside the district for which they make life-and-death decisions, and how many members own cars.

  • Harlem resident

    Community Board 10 needs a serious overall from the top of the food chain down. Not until another pedestrian gets injured or killed will they do anything and it’s all reactionary when it comes to planning ahead. The board has no diversity and just a bunch of bitter Harlem residents who ignore any new ideas or new residents who attend these meetings. Henriette the chair needs to get das boot…she’s been there too long and is useless.

  • Cranky Taxpayer

    CB 10 should re-name the transportation committee to Automobile Lovers of Harlem.

  • Uptown Resident

    Street blogs needs to go after 125th Street Business Improvement District who is not Improving the District at all. The President of the BID is another clueless political hack who has no idea about the foot traffic, bike traffic or safety measures which would make this area safer. After numerous ignored you wonder why there is a BID in the first place.


This Week: Jay Street, Riverside Drive, Morningside Avenue

This week kicks off with an opportunity to improve Jay Street in Downtown Brooklyn, and continues with a proposal to enhance pedestrian safety along Riverside Drive, discussion of bus and street safety improvements at Harlem’s CB 10, and a quality-of-like panel in Kips Bay featuring city agencies and elected officials. Check the full calendar a complete […]

Bus Lanes Coming to 125th Street in West Harlem This Summer

Bus riders may not be stuck in crosstown traffic on 125th Street much longer. DOT plans to extend bus lanes from Lenox Avenue to Morningside Avenue this summer [PDF]. The news came last night at a meeting of the Community Board 9 transportation committee. “As far as CB 9 is concerned,” said board chair Rev. Georgette Morgan-Thomas, “I didn’t hear anything that […]