Skip to Content
Streetsblog New York City home
Streetsblog New York City home
Log In
Bicycle Infrastructure

State DOT’s Spending Blueprint Overlooks Walking and Biking

Advocates for safer streets are alarmed by a New York State DOT "blueprint" for capital investments that scarcely acknowledges walking or biking as modes of transportation.

The Tri-State Transportation Campaign noted in November that the NYS DOT document released with the file name "Two Year Capital Plan" [PDF] made virtually no mention of pedestrians or cyclists.

As far as NYS DOT is concerned, this never happened. Photo: ##https://twitter.com/BrooklynSpoke/status/264074819300106240/photo/1##@BrooklynSpoke##

"Although the document uses key buzzwords -- 'multi-modal,' 'users of all modes,' 'sustainable,' 'improve livability,' 'environmental protection' -- complete streets advocates are left hanging when the document lists the ways New Yorkers get around," wrote Nadine Lemmon, Albany legislative advocate for Tri-State.

The state DOT released the report at a time when investments in walking and cycling are "getting hit left, right and center" in New York State, according to Lemmon. The new federal transportation bill, MAP-21, resulted in a 30 percent cut in federal dedicated funding, Lemmon says, and new NYS DOT policies put bike-ped projects at a disadvantage when competing for state matching funds.

The omission of walking and biking is particularly striking given the state's new complete streets law, which took effect in February.

In an email to Streetsblog, NYS DOT spokesperson Beau Duffy distinguished between the document and the capital plan, which will guide state transportation spending for two years.

The document submitted by NYS DOT to the NY Works Task force for consideration represented an infrastructure investment blueprint from which an investment level to support the development of the Department’s next transportation capital program would be advanced. NYS DOT’s report was intended to address four broad-based investment categories (Construction and Program Support, System Maintenance and Operations, Local Roads and Bridges, and Modal Infrastructure) and was not intended to address all of the infrastructure assets or modes under its jurisdiction.

Notwithstanding, each one of the four investment categories detailed by NYS DOT in the report provides support and opportunities for bicycle, pedestrian and safety-related improvements. The Department’s capital program of projects will be developed in coordination with the Executive and the Legislature as part of the State budget process.

Advocates say that explanation is just a long-winded way to distract from the lack of specific commitments to walking and biking as the capital plan takes shape. "In this document, they are asking for guidance on what funding level will be approved for the next capital program," says Lemmon. "[T]his is about the capital plan -- and [Duffy] says that."

The state's blueprint document can't afford to overlook the thousands of New York residents who are hurt and killed in traffic crashes, said New York Bicycling Coalition President Paul Winkeller in a statement [PDF]. "Official statistics show that citizens biking and walking are involved in a quarter or more of traffic related injuries and fatalities. These accidents are tragic and collectively represent a tremendous, ongoing societal expense in terms of health care and legal costs."

Pedestrians and cyclists represented 30 percent of all traffic fatalities and 12 percent of all injuries in 2011, according to data from the New York State Department of Motor Vehicles [PDF].

Defending the state DOT's commitment to safer walking and biking, Duffy said that NYS DOT is authoring guidelines for complete streets implementation, as well as a framework for federal and state funding of complete streets projects and "a website that will be devoted to complete streets implementation and accomplishments."

All of which will amount to window dressing if the state isn't devoting adequate resources to walking and cycling infrastructure.

"[This] seems to be an argument of semantics, not substance," says Lemmon. "No matter what they're calling the document now, it is disappointing that the department did not mention bicycle and pedestrian safety and investments as a part of its blueprint for the future of our state's transportation system."

Stay in touch

Sign up for our free newsletter

More from Streetsblog New York City

Allowing Cars on Park Row Would — Wait for It! — Bring More Cars Downtown, DOT Says

Chinatown residents worry the move will undercut efforts to make the area more welcoming for residents and visitors.

November 19, 2024

Tuesday’s Headlines: Suburban Agonistes Edition

Long Island Newsday has replaced the Times as the target of our outrage.

November 19, 2024

Toll of History, Part Deux: MTA Board Approves $9 Congestion Pricing Fee

Still, one of the city's most preeminent congestion pricing advocates will be holding his breath until Jan. 5.

November 18, 2024

As Congestion Pricing Passes, Suburban Naysayer on MTA Board Again Abuses His Placard

David Mack hates congestion pricing — but he loves complaining about people who park illegally (even as he parks illegally).

November 18, 2024

Reps. Torres, AOC Join to Oppose Hochul Effort to Widen Cross Bronx Expressway

The Bronx House reps told the governor that her plan to build a pair of hulking, highway-sized roads next to the existing scar is "doubling down on Robert Moses."

November 18, 2024
See all posts