On Congestion Pricing, Cuomo Plays the Pundit, Not the Governor

At a distracted driving event yesterday, Andrew Cuomo dodged his own responsibility for the politics of transit funding. Image: ##http://transportationnation.org/2012/04/24/ny-governor-cuomo-theres-no-political-support-for-congestion-pricing/##Brigid Bergin/WNYC##

Andrew Cuomo knows he’s the governor of New York, right?

You couldn’t tell from this exchange about congestion pricing yesterday, via Transportation Nation:

Q: Have you seen Sam Schwartz’s revised congestion pricing plan? Do you support it?

A: I have not seen it. We’ve talked about congestion pricing for many years. We’ve tried to pass it in the past. It hasn’t passed. I don’t know that anything has happened to change that dynamic. I just don’t know if you have the political support to pass it.

That’s the kind of detached punditry that might be appropriate coming from Chris Cuomo, TV journalist, but not the governor. Andrew Cuomo, for better and for worse, practically defines political support in this state.

Let’s look back at one of Cuomo’s signature achievements, passing a law allowing same sex marriage in New York. Two years before Cuomo signed that bill into law, gay marriage didn’t have political support either. It died by a vote of 38-24 in the State Senate. That’s significantly less support than bridge tolls had in the same year, which only needed votes from four more state senators.

Cuomo didn’t sagely nod his head and tell New York’s gay couples that he didn’t know if there was enough political support for them to marry. He launched an all-out effort to, in his words, change the dynamic.

Reported the New York Times:

“I can help you,” Mr. Cuomo assured [undecided legislators] in dozens of telephone calls and meetings, at times pledging to deploy his record-high popularity across the state to protect them in their districts. “I am more of an asset than the vote will be a liability.”

Nor do Albany politics-as-usual require Cuomo to keep mum. His two previous predecessors endorsed forms of road pricing well before the politics of the moment had crystallized. Many things doomed those two efforts, but support from the governor wasn’t one of them. “This is a necessary investment for the future of New York City, which is to a great extent the economic engine of New York State,” said Eliot Spitzer of congestion pricing in 2007. “And so this is not really a question of whether, it’s a question of how, it’s a question of making sure that we do it properly.”

David Paterson endorsed tolls on the East and Harlem River bridges the following year. “It’s either going to be fare hikes or it’s going to be tolls and a combination of payroll taxes, but it’s the only way,” he said.

Given Cuomo’s non-existent support for transit so far — in a little over a year as governor, Cuomo has raided dedicated transit funds, put hundreds of millions of dollars in MTA payroll tax revenue at risk, stripped popular transit elements out of plans for the new Tappan Zee Bridge and left the cost of the MTA’s capital plan on transit riders’ credit card — it’s perhaps the case that his punditry isn’t an outward-facing analysis of the legislative prospects for congestion pricing.

When Cuomo says, “I just don’t know if you have the political support to pass it,” he may just be talking about himself.

  • Mark Walker

    “I have not seen it,” Cuomo says of the Schwartz plan. No wonder he flunked the test: He didn’t do his homework.

  • KillMoto

    Maybe NYC can secede from NY state, and petition the federal government to become the 51st state.  Then Albany will be “that bankrupt neighbor up north, you know, the one without any industry.”

  • vnm

    “I don’t know that anything has happened to change that dynamic.” Here’s what has changed: Congestion pricing passed the City Council. East River bridge tolls passed the Assembly and was just four Democratic votes shy of passing the State Senate. Of those four votes, two (Monserrate and Espada) were voted out of office and one (Kruger) is under indictment. That leaves a mere one person (Ruben Diaz Sr.) on the record voting against bridge tolls.

  • Anonymous

    While we’re all grateful for Transportation Nation’s excellent reporting, including in this instance, it might have been even better if the reporter had asked, “Having seen Gridlock Sam Schwartz’s new traffic plan get massive and positive press coverage, including an adulatory op-ed by former NY Times editor Bill Keller and a ringing editorial endorsement in Crain’s NY Business, do you feel that political momentum might be building for Albany to adopt the plan?”

  • It’s funny – because tolling the East River bridges and doing congestion pricing would help Mr. Cuomo pay for MTA. He’s made it clear he doesn’t want to fully fund the agency using, say, dedicated revenue sources (which he raided) or dedicated taxes (which he reduced).

  • This is pretty distant answer from the man who is supposed to know what is really happening with congestion pricing and in the state itself. Nice one, Mark – he didn’t do his homework even for the media.


Chris Quinn: “I Don’t Anticipate Congestion Pricing Coming Back Around”

Dana Rubinstein reports that City Council speaker and current mayoral front-runner Christine Quinn is bearish on congestion pricing’s political prospects: “I don’t anticipate congestion pricing coming back around,” City Council Speaker Christine Quinn told an audience at New York Law School today, when asked about its near-term future. “It didn’t do well and I don’t […]