Upper East Side Joins Chorus of Car-Free Central Park Supporters

Car-Free Park Rally — In 2006, car-free Central Park advocates delivered a petition with an unprecedented 100,000 signatures to City Hall. Image ##http://www.streetfilms.org/car-free-central-park-rally/##via Streetfilms.##

The momentum is growing for a summer-long trial of a car-free Central Park.

Two weeks ago, the transportation and parks committees of Manhattan Community Board 7, representing the Upper West Side, voted unanimously to support such a trial. Last week, the proposal passed the transportation committee of Midtown’s CB 5, again unanimously. And last night, the transportation and parks committees of the Upper East Side’s CB 8 voted to endorse the proposal with only one no vote between them. Three of the neighborhoods bordering the park — those with the most at stake — have now offered unambiguous endorsements of testing out a car-free park.

At last night’s CB 8 meeting, nearly every member of each committee expressed his or her opinion on the proposal, and they were overwhelmingly positive. Though some board members suggested uncontroversial tweaks to the plan, for most the benefits of at least trying out a car-free park were so self-evident they didn’t require elaboration. That’s a rarity in community boards, institutions rarely known for being reserved or concise. As Upper East Side resident Albert Ahronheim said last night, “there’s nothing to fear from this trial.”

Advocates for taking motor vehicles off the loop drive — cars could still drive on the transverses — have been steadily winning car-free time and space for decades. Mayor Bloomberg has stated that he is unwilling to close the park to cars entirely, however, citing concerns about increased traffic on nearby roads.

That’s what makes the idea of a trial period so appealing. Under the proposal endorsed by the community board committees, the city would close the loop to cars for a few months and DOT would study the effect of the closure on traffic. If the mayor is right and the change paralyzes traffic, they can simply move the barriers they put in place and let cars right back in.

There’s good reason to think that Bloomberg’s fears are misplaced, however. A 2008 Transportation Alternatives study found that allowing cars to drive through Central Park actually increased congestion in Harlem, and former Traffic Commissioner Sam Schwartz has said that the long-term impact on traffic of closing the loop to cars would be minimal. Even if that isn’t enough to convince the mayor to take cars off the loop drive right now, it’s more than enough to merit the real-world experiment of a trial period.

The community-level campaign to test out a car-free park continues tonight, when Community Board 9’s transportation committee takes up the issue. A vote at the Borough Board could happen as soon as three weeks from now.

Streetsman

Didn’t we go through this whole closing parks will cause traffic congestion saga 52 years ago with Washington Square Park, where it was conclusively proven that congestion on surrounding streets actually decreases? Didn’t we also learn through this administration’s own Times Square project that we can try things out first and see if they work before making them permanent? Have we learned nothing?
Anonymous

I think opponents are afraid it WILL work, and stick, just like Times Square, no smoking in bars, calories on menus, bike lanes, etc. Right now the only way to smoke in the park is in your car–haha. Personally, I think cars and parks are inherently incompatible, but it’s just another piece of turf for people to fight over.
Austin Scott Brooks

Curious as to how this will effect Upper
East Side Manhattan real estate owners. Are there proposed alternate traffic routes that will diminish congestion? If there is overwhelmingly positive support, they must have figured out how to work around any downfalls.