Skip to Content
Streetsblog New York City home
Streetsblog New York City home
Log In
Streetsblog

Should Transit Systems Charge More During Peak Hours?

338846804_cb792de790.jpgShould peak-hour Metro commuters pay a surcharge in the most congested part of the system? (Photo: roboppy via Flickr)

This morning on the Streetsblog Network, there's a lively and intelligent discussion going on at Jarrett Walker's Human Transit over the question "Should fares be higher during peak hours?"

The Human Transit post was sparked by an earlier discussion at Yonah Freemark's blog, The Transport Politic, about the possibility of peak surcharges on Washington, D.C.'s Metro system (it already costs more to ride Metro at peak times; the proposal in question is for an additional 50-cent charge in the most congested part of the system).

Walker thinks such charges could be a good thing:

There's also an argument for peak surcharging that connects with urbanist goals for transit. People who have the option of traveling off-peak should be encouraged to do so, because off-peak capacity is usually abundant, while peak capacity is naturally scarce and costly for the transit agency. This strategy helps build off-peak patronage, which supports more all-day service, which leads directly to transit that is more relevant to the entire life of the city rather than just the commute. All-day frequent service is the only type of service that can support transit-oriented development and thus change the shape of the city in more sustainable ways.  From an urbanist perspective, then, a gentle but persistent effort to shift demand away from the peak makes sense.

I have trouble even seeing a social justice argument against peak surcharges, as the average peak-period traveler usually has a higher income than an average midday traveler (because lower-paying jobs, mostly in service industries, are less likely to start and end on the usual peak). So insisting on flat fares all day could actually be seen as regressive.

Be sure to check out both original posts for a well-reasoned debate on the topic.

More from around the network: Totcycle proposes a "Bike to School Across America" competition. Seattle Transit Blog previews Mayor Mike McGinn's forthcoming "Walk Bike Ride" initiative. And Broken Sidewalk has a little snippet about a college basketball player who wouldn't get into a car during March Madness -- because he recognized how dangerous it can be.

Stay in touch

Sign up for our free newsletter

More from Streetsblog New York City

Meet Steve Fulop, Corporate New York’s New Mouthpiece

Streetsblog sat down with former Jersey City Mayor Steve Fulop last week to discuss his new role at the Partnership for New York City.

February 4, 2026

Promising E-Bike Subsidy Pilot Is Denied Funding By State Agency

New York City's first e-bike subsidy program is stalled after not receiving state funding for implementation.

February 4, 2026

Wednesday’s Headlines: Nothingburger From The Albany Sausage Grinder Edition

OK, so the transportation hearing was a bust, but two groups questioned the governor's car insurance proposal, so that's a start. Plus other news.

February 4, 2026

Cyclists in Criminal Court Say Mamdani’s Bike Crackdown is a ‘Waste of Time’

The hearings reveal that the mayor's promise to end criminal summonsing against cyclists has not been kept.

February 3, 2026

‘Lowballing Victims’: Crash Survivors Furious At Hochul’s Car Insurance Proposal

Crash victims and a key state lawmaker are not yet sold on Hochul's car insurance scheme, and hope that the state listens.

February 3, 2026

Opinion: Transit Watchword Should Be Synergy, Not Scarcity

Two fantastic transit ideas — fast and free buses, and a 17-percent expansion of subway mileage — are being set up as adversaries. But they're complementary.

February 3, 2026
See all posts