Back Home in Coeur d’Alene, Where the Cars Roam Free

Pretty much everyone involved in the movement for livable streets has by now read the reports and studies about the importance of street design in pedestrian safety. But nothing can bring the point home like what happened to the writer of the Streetsblog Network blog Imagine No Cars: He was hit by a car.

First off, we are happy to tell you that he was lucky enough to escape the encounter with only a bruise to his leg. Here’s what happened.

Ramsey.jpgA Google street view of the road where the author of Imagine No Cars was hit.

The other day, he reports, he was visiting his home town of Coeur d’Alene, Idaho. He was dropped off by a Greyhound bus at a different spot than he expected — a gas station on a particularly bleak and pedestrian-unfriendly stretch of road. As he walked in the direction he knew his father would be driving from to pick him up, he crossed an intersection where two four-lane arterials meet. He was in a crosswalk when he was struck by a car making a right on red. The driver was looking the other way.

He writes that the incident made him even more acutely aware of the importance of street design. He has been attending school in Missoula, Montana, and has become accustomed to the streetscape there, which is much more pedestrian-friendly:

Living in Missoula, I have walked hundreds, perhaps even a thousand
miles around town over the course of seven years. In that time I have
never been hit by a car… I don’t even remember having a close call.
But here I am, back in the town I grew up in, and five minutes after
stepping off the bus I am hit by a car.

The whole time I lived
in Coeur d’Alene, I never once got around by walking or biking. The only
real way to get around is by car. Seven years of walking in Missoula =
no problem, five minutes of walking in CDA = getting hit by a car.
Missoula and CDA are also fairly close in terms of population size.

is this? Because of not only the streetscape that dominates in CDA
(suburban arterials with speeds above 35 mph) but also the development
pattern that essentially forced those types of roadways to be built…

Because people have to drive everywhere and there are almost no
pedestrians or cyclists, the motorists don’t look out for these types
of people. Those who do walk or bike are mostly a working-poor
underclass — except for the roadies — that most suburbanites don’t spend any time thinking of between trips
to Starbucks, work, and dropping the kids off at soccer practice.

Coincidentally, the Coeur d’Alene Pedestrian and Bicycle Advisory Committee has recently launched a new blog. Sounds like they need it.

More from around the network: Garden State Smart Growth on VMT as an economic indicator. on why the LA doctor case does not signal a sea change in the relationship between bicyclists and the justice system. And WalkBikeCT has a few caveats on a the concept of a vulnerable users law.

  • Right turn on red, something not seen outside of North America, is probably one of the most dangerous rules we have for pedestrians and bikes. Cars roll to a red light, look left and then turn, forgetting that pedestrians can cross from their right. It’s made even more dangerous when the car in the next lane stops forward, so a pedestrian crossing from the left “pops” out from behind that car in front of the car turning right that isn’t stopping.

    Changing that law, so that cars can only turn right on red when they have a separate right turn signal could make things much better in suburbia.

  • Jeremy

    I think of this nearly every day in Boston, where I live. I have no idea how it would ever be politically feasible to prohibit right turn on red, but my daily observations indicate than less than 10% of all drivers actually stop.

    The difference here (versus suburban wasteland) is that drivers generally look for pedestrians because they expect us to be around, but they often fail to yield the right of way unless forced to by an aggressive pedestrian (such as myself). Even when they aren’t going anywhere, right-turners block the crosswalk almost all the time.

    In contrast, blocking the crosswalk is much more rare at intersections where “no turn on red” is posted, and in NYC where it’s not allowed.

  • Jeremy,and in Boston, there are many intersections where right turn on red is not allowed, versus the suburbs where it’s allowed at every intersection. So it’s better, but as you said, not good.

    I think in Boston’s case, there’s actually a law (city, state?) that makes a blanket ban of right turn on reds impossible: engineers need to prove that a certain threshold of traffic is met to ban the practice at that intersection.

    Boston also has the problem where drivers always block the box. At least NYC has lowered that practice through heavy fines and signs.


Montana Bicycle Blogger Terrorized by Drunk Driver

One of our Streetsblog Network member bloggers had a terrifying encounter with a pickup truck full of drunken men the other night. The author of the blog Imagine No Cars, wrote of being chased through the streets of Missoula, Montana, in fear for his life: Is terrorizing people wth motor vehicles just part of the […]

When Dodging Death Becomes a Fact of Life

Lisa Sladkus sent in this photo of yesterday’s mayhem at the 72nd Street subway station. For the second time (that we know of) in less than a week, a yellow cab driver has wreaked havoc on Manhattan streets, terrorizing pedestrians and leaving a trail of destruction. Miraculously, unlike Akim Saiful Alam, the unidentified driver in […]

“Stupid Pedestrians” Aren’t Causing the High Death Toll on Delaware Streets

According to new data from the National Highway Transportation Safety Administration, Delaware is the most dangerous state for pedestrians per capita. Already this year, 28 people have been killed while walking in the tiny Mid-Atlantic state, about twice the national average, according to the News Journal. Predictably, the comments on the story are disgusting, notes James Wilson […]