Pricing Round-Up: Dems Conference in Albany
Assembly Democrats met behind closed doors last night to gauge their collective sentiment on congestion pricing. According to the Post, only seven of the 36 legislators who spoke during the meeting expressed support, but the one who matters most, Shelly Silver, remains uncommitted:
Silver, who has not voiced a public position on the issue,said the meetings will continue today, and he refused to declare theplan dead.
Meanwhile, Assembly Minority Leader Jim Tedisco has proposed that pricing be attached to the budget, the Daily Politics reports, which would make it tougher to vote down. But on this count, Silver's position is already well-known.
Assembly Speaker Sheldon Silver reportedly is vehemently opposed toincluding congestion pricing in the budget, and has said he doesn'twant to deal with this issue at all until after the budget is passed.
After the jump, a collection of quotes from lawmakers following last night's meeting.
From the Times:
“I think it’s going down,” said Anthony S. Seminerio, an assemblyman from Queens. “There are too many unanswered questions.”
“This is Albany, and nothing is dead until it’s dead, dead,” saidAssemblyman Daniel J. O’Donnell, who represents the Upper West Side andopposes the mayor’s plan. Still, he said, “It doesn’t look good.”
“The Assembly won’t let the mayor and Senator Bruno force this into thebudget,” said Micah Kellner, a Democratic Assemblyman from the UpperEast Side who supports congestion pricing. “The Assembly is going tostand firm on this.”
From the Post:
"Congestion pricing is not dead but it's on life support," said Assemblyman opponent Hakeem Jeffries (D-Brooklyn). "[It] will require substantial amendments in order to revive it and even that may not be enough."
Assemblyman Michael Benjamin (D-Bronx), another opponent of the tollsystem -- which is already operating in London -- fumed: "The last goodidea to come from Britain was radar!"
"It's a good plan," said Assemblyman Adam Clayton Powell IV (D-Manhattan), one of the few local supporters who spoke. "Anything that reduces vehicle traffic and increases mass transit is agood thing. Driving into Manhattan is a privilege, not a right."
From New York 1:
"It’s just a bad approach where working class citizens of the cityof New York are going to wind up having to pay either $8 or eventuallya fare increase,” said Assembly member Ruben Diaz, Jr.
"It’s our obligation to help the city and help our neighborhood toobtain the funds necessary to improve our system,” said Assembly memberCarmen Arroyo.
"There are some problems in the bill. I think that would need to getaddressed before I could consider voting for it," said AssemblymemberDanny O'Donnell.
Stay in touch
Sign up for our free newsletter
More from Streetsblog New York City
Why Sustainable Transportation Advocates Need to Talk About Long COVID
Covid-19 transformed many U.S. cities' approach to sustainable transportation forever. But how did it transform the lives of sustainable transportation advocates who developed lasting symptoms from the disease?
Analysis: ‘Dangerous Vehicle Abatement Program’ is a Failure By All Measures
The Department of Transportation wants the Dangerous Vehicle Abatement Program to simply expire in part because it did not dramatically improve safety among these worst-of-the-worst drivers and led to a tiny number of vehicle seizures.
School Bus Driver Kills Cyclist in Boro Park, 24th Bike Death of 2023
Luis Perez-Ramirez, 44, was biking south on Fort Hamilton Parkway just before 3:15 p.m. when he was struck a by school bus driver making a right turn.
‘Betrayal’: Adams Caves to Opposition, Abandons Bus Improvement Plan on Fordham Road
The capitulation on Fordham Road is the latest episode in which the mayor has delayed or watered down a transportation project in deference to powerful interests.
Friday’s Headlines: Yes He Said Yes He Will Yes Edition
That headline above is a reference to the last line of James Joyce's Ulysses, which we won't pretend to have read. But we have that ... and other news.
