What Paterson’s Senate District Stands to Gain From Pricing

30grab.jpgWith conflicting reports on congestion pricing’s status in Albany, and given his own ambiguous statements, it remains to be seen whether Governor David Paterson will get behind the plan — though a look at census data published by the Tri State Transportation Campaign shows that most of those he once represented in the New York State Senate could only benefit.

In District 30, which stretches from the Upper West Side to Washington Heights and includes Harlem, Morningside Heights and Sugar Hill:

  • 54.5% commute into the proposed congestion pricing zone for work
  • 45.5% take transit into the zone
  • 2.8% drive alone into the zone
  • 79.8% of households do not have a vehicle (average annual income: $38,089)
  • 20.2% of households have one or more vehicles (average annual income: $89,390)
  • 96.8% would not pay the congestion charge

Along with perks that would be enjoyed by the entire city — reduced traffic, cleaner air, improved overall transit, funds for livable streets amenities, etc. — Paterson’s former district (where he still lives) would also see a host of bus service upgrades. Among them:

  • M1/M2/M3/M4: 9 new local buses
  • M101/M102/M103: 5 new articulated buses
  • M98: 10 new express buses
  • M86: 4 new articulated buses
  • M104: 3 new local buses

Taken on the whole, over half of congestion pricing-related bus service improvements in Manhattan would directly benefit residents of Senate District 30.

The 30th District is now represented by Senator Bill Perkins. I was scheduled to attend a meeting with Perkins on congestion pricing in Albany on Tuesday, but when he didn’t show after half an hour I had to head to Deborah Glick’s office.

Graph: Tri-State Transportation Campaign

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

Fact Check: Congestion Pricing is Not a “Regressive Tax”

|
One of the most oft-repeated slams against congestion pricing we heard at this week’s Congestion Mitigation Committee hearings is that congestion pricing would be a "regressive tax," an unfair burden to poorer New Yorkers. Is congestion pricing regressive? The data suggests otherwise. As the chart above shows, even in Brooklyn Council member Lew Fidler’s heavily […]

Paterson Backs Pricing, Introduces Bill in Albany

|
David Paterson is going to do right by his old State Senate district after all. New York’s new governor settled any doubts about his position on congestion pricing this afternoon, introducing a bill that follows the recommendations of the Traffic Congestion Mitigation Commission. The Daily Politics has the scoop: "Congestion pricing addresses two urgent concerns […]

Who Are Anti-Pricing Pols Really Looking Out For?

|
Responding to some politicians’ claims that congestion pricing is a "regressive tax" that would impact "working stiffs" who must drive to their jobs, the Tri-State Transportation Campaign and the Pratt Center for Community Development have compiled data, broken down by district, showing that the vast majority of commuters in New York City and surrounding counties […]

Glick’s Excuse: Everything But the Kitchen Sink

|
Welcome to Glickville As Deborah Glick herself would tell you, no state legislator had more reason to support congestion pricing than she did. In a district where 95.4 percent of working residents would not have paid the charge, where households with a car are outnumbered by households sans vehicle three to one, and which nonetheless […]