The Car as Underdog, and Other Mind-Benders

From the New York Times’ new City Room blog comes a post entitled "Congestion Pricing: Has David Bested Goliath?"

Hint: "The answer might depend on who you think is the giant."

Which coalition has been winning so far in the congestion pricing wars?
So far, at least, the pro-congestion pricing forces have been on the
defensive, even though they appear to be much better organized and
financed and have the support of three bedrock organizations of
municipal influence: the Partnership for New York City, the Regional Plan Association and the Citizens Budget Commission.

But it is not clear that supporters of congestion pricing have won
enough public support, despite having achieved broad support among
organized interests. Meanwhile, opponents of congestion pricing, like
the Queens Civic Congress, have had a lower test to meet
; their goal is
to defeat the traffic fees by raising just enough doubt and skepticism — with a public that is already doubtful and skeptical.

No matter that the overwhelming majority of commuters to Manhattan do
not need to drive, or that the money raised from traffic fees would be
used to improve mass transit across the city. The point is that the
opponents of congestion pricing, like the Queens Civic Congress, have
so far managed to create enough doubt around the idea — a doubt that
has swayed many Assembly members.

Of course it’s easy to raise doubt and skepticism about a complex issue when one’s arguments are largely unburdened by facts. Take this passage on Council Member David Weprin from today’s Metro, in which the paper itself — as does the City Room passage above — refutes a rote, yet mostly baseless, objection to congestion pricing.

"I represent a district in eastern Queens that for most people is
four or five miles from the nearest subway,” he said. "It is also not
accessible to buses. You can’t tell me that they’re going to start
building subways and changing bus lines in time if they’re going to
adopt this congestion tax now."

Yet that is the stated intention of the Bloomberg
administration, which hopes to first increase bus service to areas that
lack subway access before implementing congestion pricing. More than
half of the projected $500 million federal grant would supposedly go
for transportation improvements. For example, one neighborhood in
Weprin’s district — Bayside — is already slated to get new and expanded
bus service under the mayor’s long-term sustainability plan, dubbed

Weprin, though, remains unconvinced.

"The mayor is asking Albany to act now on the congestion tax and
to worry about the public transportation improvements later," he said. "That’s backwards."

So Weprin wants to kill the plan to finance the improvements he says are needed before the plan he wants to kill can be implemented.

David and Goliath? Sure, if this version has a looking glass

  • drose

    By the way, Weprin has been crowned the “King of Pork” for reaping the highest total of member items in the City’s budget for next year, according to the Gotham Gazette. No prizes for guessing how much of the $700+K he reaped will go to the poor, transit-deprived motorists he ostensibly represents.

  • brent

    Instead of all this Joe six-pack working man populist mumbo jumbo double talk, why doesn’t Weprin just come out and say exactly what’s on his and the Baysiders minds, “Why should I ride the damn bus when I can drive to the city and park for nothin”.

  • rhubarbpie

    Again, this is an argument easily refuted by the evidence — but the mayor didn’t do the due diligence he needed to do by directly challenging Weprin and other opponents on their turf. I wonder why Mayor Bloomberg didn’t take the battle to Queens and Brooklyn, where he is well liked and where the vast majority of residents who travel into Manhattan are taking the subway (and bus) to get there. Anyone have any thoughts about this?

  • greg

    another reason why queens sucks and should be ceded to long island

    and give SI to nj while we’re at it

    enough with the suburban mentality within the borders of NYC

  • RGD

    SI voted to secede from the city in the 1980s, and the city was willing to go through with it, but the thieving state government prohibited it. By the way, if you think I am accusing the state government incorrectly, view Streetsblog articles on how Cuomo stole from the Subway, and see also the nearly half dozen court cases against the state legislature for stealing from New York City’s Schools.


It’s Time to Tell Your Reps to Vote for Pricing

The public hearings have been held, the commission has approved a plan, now the votes on congestion pricing are fast approaching. As the March 31st legislative deadline draws near, Transportation Alternatives and other pro-pricing groups are ramping up the advocacy. Yesterday, T.A. sent a message to supporters outlining its strategy. The ad to the right […]

Congestion Panel Meets Amidst Q Poll Parsing

The third meeting of the 17-member Traffic Congestion Mitigation Commission will be held at 2:00 this afternoon at the offices of Hughes Hubbard and Reed, 1 Battery Park Plaza (24 State St. @ Pearl St.), 10th Floor, in Manhattan. Today’s event comes on the heels of a new Quinnipiac Poll, released yesterday, that shows support […]