The Car as Underdog, and Other Mind-Benders

From the New York Times’ new City Room blog comes a post entitled "Congestion Pricing: Has David Bested Goliath?"

Hint: "The answer might depend on who you think is the giant."

Which coalition has been winning so far in the congestion pricing wars?
So far, at least, the pro-congestion pricing forces have been on the
defensive, even though they appear to be much better organized and
financed and have the support of three bedrock organizations of
municipal influence: the Partnership for New York City, the Regional Plan Association and the Citizens Budget Commission.

But it is not clear that supporters of congestion pricing have won
enough public support, despite having achieved broad support among
organized interests. Meanwhile, opponents of congestion pricing, like
the Queens Civic Congress, have had a lower test to meet
; their goal is
to defeat the traffic fees by raising just enough doubt and skepticism — with a public that is already doubtful and skeptical.

No matter that the overwhelming majority of commuters to Manhattan do
not need to drive, or that the money raised from traffic fees would be
used to improve mass transit across the city. The point is that the
opponents of congestion pricing, like the Queens Civic Congress, have
so far managed to create enough doubt around the idea — a doubt that
has swayed many Assembly members.

Of course it’s easy to raise doubt and skepticism about a complex issue when one’s arguments are largely unburdened by facts. Take this passage on Council Member David Weprin from today’s Metro, in which the paper itself — as does the City Room passage above — refutes a rote, yet mostly baseless, objection to congestion pricing.

"I represent a district in eastern Queens that for most people is
four or five miles from the nearest subway,” he said. "It is also not
accessible to buses. You can’t tell me that they’re going to start
building subways and changing bus lines in time if they’re going to
adopt this congestion tax now."

Yet that is the stated intention of the Bloomberg
administration, which hopes to first increase bus service to areas that
lack subway access before implementing congestion pricing. More than
half of the projected $500 million federal grant would supposedly go
for transportation improvements. For example, one neighborhood in
Weprin’s district — Bayside — is already slated to get new and expanded
bus service under the mayor’s long-term sustainability plan, dubbed

Weprin, though, remains unconvinced.

"The mayor is asking Albany to act now on the congestion tax and
to worry about the public transportation improvements later," he said. "That’s backwards."

So Weprin wants to kill the plan to finance the improvements he says are needed before the plan he wants to kill can be implemented.

David and Goliath? Sure, if this version has a looking glass


Responses to $354 Million Federal Congestion Pricing Grant

Here are two initial responses to this morning’s news that the US DOT will grant New York City $354 million to implement Mayor Bloomberg’s congestion pricing plan: Walter McCaffrey, right, a former city councilman from Queens who has been coordinating opposition to the mayor’s plan on behalf of the Queens Chamber of Commerce, The Automobile […]

Congestion Pricing: Bloomberg Needs to Sweeten the Deal

Webster Avenue and Fordham Road, the Bronx Congestion pricing is in trouble. With just weeks to go before the Traffic Mitigation Commission makes its recommendations to the City Council and State Legislature, public support is waning and opponents appear to have the upper hand. The one sales pitch that scored high in public opinion polls, […]

Glick’s Excuse: Everything But the Kitchen Sink

Welcome to Glickville As Deborah Glick herself would tell you, no state legislator had more reason to support congestion pricing than she did. In a district where 95.4 percent of working residents would not have paid the charge, where households with a car are outnumbered by households sans vehicle three to one, and which nonetheless […]

Pricing Advocates Call for Impact Study and New Parking Policies

Congestion pricing advocate Carolyn Konheim and consulting partner Brian Ketcham are advising the Bloomberg administration to drop its resistance to a congestion pricing Environmental Impact Study. The two say a study is needed to head off "likely 11th hour litigation" aimed at stopping the three-year pilot program from taking effect, a possibility Streetsblog alluded to […]