Skip to Content
Streetsblog New York City home
Streetsblog New York City home
Log In
Energy

Bloomberg on Oil Dependence: Punditry or Policy?

The Daily News reports that Mayor Bloomberg made his first public statements about U.S. oil dependency on his radio show last week:

This constant dependence on oil is something that leaves this country vulnerable every day. Two reasons. One, what happens if it gets cut off overseas? We're never going to have enough capacity domestically. And, two, where are these petro dollars going? They are going to buy arms for terrorists who are going to attack freedom around the world and, as 9/11 showed, they can attack here as well.

While Streetsblog leans towards global climate change and local quality of life as the more compelling reasons for New York City to care about reducing petroleum consumption, it's great to hear Bloomberg talking about the oil dependence issue.

Still, you've got to wonder how the Mayor connects his personal views to his day job. Bloomberg isn't a radio host, blogger or pundit. He doesn't have to sit behind a microphone or computer monitor and kvetch. He is the Mayor of New York City. He can do something about this problem.

With the stroke of a pen, the Mayor could put in place a number transportation and land use policies that would significantly reduce New York City's automobile dependence and petroleum consumption. And with some more serious political arm-twisting, Bloomberg could probably implement far-reaching traffic-reduction measures similar to what is being tried in London and Paris. Yet, New York City has no long-term transportation vision or stategy. Aside from highly localized projects in places like Staten Island and Downtown Brooklyn, Mayor Bloomberg's Department of Transportation is doing little to address the city's growing traffic congestion problem.

Streetsblog is hoping that this is all part of Bloomberg's Autumn 2006 strategy. He is talking about the petroleum-terrorism connection to help prepare car-dependent Outer Borough New Yorkers for a far-reaching transportation strategy that will, in part, make it less convenient to drive into the city. They'll be more willing to take the hit because they will be made to feel like they aiding America's national security.

Stay in touch

Sign up for our free newsletter

More from Streetsblog New York City

Safe Streets, Workers Rights, Crash Victims Targeted By Big Tech In Super Bowl Ads

Some Super Bowl commercials are ads. And some are warning shots.

February 10, 2026

Opinion: The City, Not Just Lyft, Deserves Blame for Citi Bike’s Winter Mess

The Mamdani administration should fine Lyft for falling short of its contractual obligations — and reward it for meeting or surpassing them.

February 10, 2026

Tuesday’s Headlines: A Gateway to Nothing Edition

The Gateway Tunnel project remains stalled to allow President Trump to appeal. Plus other news from a busy day.

February 10, 2026

Queens Pol Trolls Her Own Constituents From Her Ticket-Covered Lincoln As They March For Car-Free Parks

Queens Council Member Joann Ariola mocked her own constituents in an "adolescent" and "antagonistic" move just because some people want a car-free park.

February 9, 2026

Snow Problem: Can New York City Handle Big Winter Storms Anymore?

There are eight million people in the big city. And 32 million opinions on the Mamdani administration's response to its first snow crisis.

February 9, 2026

Video: Another Way The Snow Reveals Our Misallocation of Public Space

New Yorkers barely use their cars and, instead, use them to seize public space.

February 9, 2026
See all posts