Skip to Content
Streetsblog New York City home
Streetsblog New York City home
Log In
State Legislature

Albany Pols Seize the Helm(et)

Helmet laws remain controversial — they're the "common-sense" approach pushed by lawmakers who ignore that studies show they don't improve safety.

The Streetsblog Photoshop Desk
Amy Sohn in Albany

ALBANY — The state Assembly on Thursday took aim at young Citi Bike users, subjecting them to onerous fines by passing a bill to mandate helmet for 16- and 17-year-old users of electric bikes, even the pedal assist versions that have become the most popular part of the bike share fleet.

The teen helmet bill, A590, passed the full Assembly even though opponents say it will make cycling less safe and undermine the Citi Bike system.

“There is extensive evidence that what keeps cyclists safe are protected bike lanes, enforcement against dangerous driver behavior, and more people riding bikes — not mandatory helmet laws," the Lyft-owned Citi Bike previously told Streetsblog during earlier coverage of this bill.

Research shows that helmet laws lead to a decline in bike-share use, which also harms public health; increased ridership increases cyclist safety. 

The more people bike on the streets, the safer the streets are for everyone who bikes. This phenomenon, originally identified by researcher Peter Jacobsen, is known as "safety in numbers."

But Assembly Member Amy Paulin (D-Westchester), who sponsored the bill in her chamber, said in a statement that the bill aims to “protect young riders from preventable injuries” and merely closes a loophole: 16- and 17-year-olds are already required to wear helmets on Class 3 e-bikes, which go up to 25 miles per hour and are legal only in New York City, but not Class 1 and 2. 

Faster e-bikes do cause higher rates of injuries and nearly twice the rate of internal injuries as compared to cyclists. A 2024 study found that compared to pedal bicycle users, e-bike users were more likely to suffer head injuries (60.4 percent vs. 52 percent) in crashes.

The study reported that helmeted e-bike users more commonly involved neck injuries and sprains than head injuries and fractures.

Senate sponsor Rachel May (D–Onondaga), a former Marshall scholar and director of sustainability education at Syracuse University, acknowledged that helmet normalization would be better than laws: “I think it’s safer to ride with a helmet so I want more people to be wearing helmets. I wish we could just normalize it so it was presupposed.”

Enforcement will certainly be an issue: the Times reported that Seattle’s Board of Health dropped its helmet law because of “discriminatory enforcement of the rule against homeless people and people of color.”

May acknowledged the challenge but still wants a helmet law. In Syracuse, where she lives, “the streets are more dangerous in Black and brown neighborhoods so the roads aren’t maintained as well and traffic patterns are more chaotic — so the benefits of protection versus the cost of enforcement is something we have to weigh.” (One supposes the roads could be better maintained...)

We’ll report back on how the teen helmet bill fares in the Senate — after the Albany reporter gifts her college-aged teen, who is home for the summer, with a Citi Bike membership.


Amy’s Albany Addenda

Call your state Senator!

That's the message from upstate Sen. Rachel May regarding the Idaho Stop bill that she has sponsored.

The bill, it turns out, is getting pushback from city lawmakers in both the Senate and the Assembly — ironically because those city lawmakers see cyclists as perps, not victims.

“Pretty much all the pushback is coming from New York City, and it has to do with cyclists misbehaving," May told Streetsblog. But the collective anti-cyclist pendulum might be swinging back because of how the NYPD has recast cyclists as criminal, she added.

"This year, because of the crackdown by the police, a lot of my colleagues are more open to [legalizing the Idaho Stop]," she said, referring to a rule that would allow cyclists to treat red lights as "Stop" signs and "Stop" signs as "Yield" signs, as long as there are no pedestrians or cars around.

May said that the compromise that could push the bill over the finish line would be making it an "opt-in thing" so that "local governments" could decide what to do in their communities.

We chatted more about the bill and I suggested that legalizing the Idaho Stop is actually a law-and-order position because if cyclists could legally glide through a light (if no one is around), the cops could devote their limited energies to much more important enforcement duties. She urged me to send that message to Streetsblog readers: “New York City senators need to hear that [message] from someone who’s not me.”

You heard her, Streetsbloggers. Click the links to find your Senator and your Assembly member.

Stay in touch

Sign up for our free newsletter

More from Streetsblog New York City

BREAKING: Mayor Adams to Remove Bedford Avenue Protected Bike Lane Citing, Bizarrely, Safety

A protected bike lane that was installed last year to calm a notoriously dangerous Brooklyn corridor will be removed by the Adams administration, making the roadway less safe.

June 13, 2025

Senate Votes to Require Delivery Apps to Provide Insurance for Workers

Speed limits are fine, but what will really help crash victims is insurance.

June 13, 2025

Friday’s Video: A Recap on Mayor Adams’s ‘War on Cyclists’

Here's a nice synopsis by Emily Lipstein of how we got from a proposed "Department of Sustainable Delivery" to a criminal crackdown on bike riders.

June 13, 2025

Round and Round: No Plan for Protected Bike Lane Through 79th Street Rotunda

The Parks and Transportation departments plan to toss Hudson River greenway cyclists into the mix with highway-bound cars on the 79th Street Rotunda despite the pleas of the local community board.

June 13, 2025

Friday’s Headlines: E-Bike Trade Show Edition

So let us get this straight: The Adams administration is at once cracking down e-bikes, but also giving workers safe e-bikes at the same time? Plus other news.

June 13, 2025

KOMANOFF: A Philosopher Of Cycling Takes On E-Bike Speeds (Well, Sort Of)

The late Ivan Illich would have sought to limit them — among other things, says our columnist.

June 12, 2025
See all posts