Skip to Content
Streetsblog New York City home
Streetsblog New York City home
Log In
Carnage

Manhattan Board Ask DOT To Cancel Rule Hampering Curb Extensions

A temporary neckdown in Oakland, Calif.

An influential Manhattan panel is asking the city to allow “quick-build” curb extensions, arguing that the current restrictions hurts pedestrian safety and disadvantages poor and residential areas.

Manhattan Community Board 4 has asked the Department of Transportation that it “reexamine its practice of requiring a maintenance partner and insurance for the installation of temporary curb extensions,” because the requirement “limits opportunities to install [the] pedestrian safety features” and thereby “indirectly contributes to avoidable pedestrian deaths and injuries.”

The rule effectively limits the temporary curb extensions to areas with strong Business Improvement Districts that can shoulder the requirements of maintenance and insurance.

“We are requesting these changes because the rule is preventing the implementation of those features in the places that need it the most,” said Christine Berthet, the transportation co-chairperson of CB4 and a signer of the Aug. 3 letter. “We want these features to be installed very easily everywhere.”

The letter — from a board that represents diverse communities, from the luxury high rises of the far West Side to New York City Housing Authority buildings — represents the latest local attempt to restore equity in the city’s built environment and reclaim road space from automobiles for people. 

In the last year, several Manhattan community boards have resolved to explore alternative uses for their curbside space, which is dominated by private car storage. CB7, representing the Upper West Side, and CB2, representing lower Manhattan, asked that the DOT study such uses as residential loading zones, paid parking permits, expanded metering, and other remedies in order promote safety and relieve congestion.

Then, too, many New Yorkers are seeking to dismantle the legacy of systemic racism and disinvestment in poor communities: Generations of planners built noxious highways through poor neighborhoods and denied them amenities such as street-safety infrastructure and plentiful parks

In this case, the board is seeking to employ so-called tactical urbanism —  temporary curb extensions — in the service of safety and equity.

The extensions, known as “neckdowns,” use paint and flexible bollards to bulk out curbs either at intersections or midblock, a cheaper and easier build than permanently extending a sidewalk with concrete (which can affect utilities).  

Even so — as the board noted and the DOT’s own manual maintains — neckdowns confer the same benefits for long-suffering pedestrians as permanent extensions: they reduce crossing distances, relieve sidewalk crowding, slow down turning vehicles, highlight the pedestrian right-of-way, and discourage the incursion of trucks onto “No Truck” streets.

“With so many benefits, this cost-effective strategy is applicable to many locations,” the board wrote. “Yet, to install a temporary sidewalk extension in the street bed, DOT requires a contract with a maintenance partner. This maintenance partner must have insurance and agree to take on specific duties, including sweeping, snow removal, and watering of any planters. Finding such partners can be a long, drawn-out process.”

Or an impossible process — if the area in question is a poor neighborhood with few institutions and fewer resources, or simply a highly residential area. 

CB4 wrote that, in particular, it was looking to install neckdowns at four intersections, including one next to “a NYCHA complex where a young boy was killed,” another “at a corner where two seniors were killed,” and two others near large affordable-housing complexes for seniors.

A DOT spokeswoman said, "the letter was received and we are currently reviewing it."

The CB4 request comes as an earlier request for the city to stop requiring maintenance partners — in that case for the installation of bike corrals — seems to be finally taking root at DOT. The agency promised earlier in this year that it would slowly start installing bike corrals without a partner. The agency said recently that it would install four such bike parking spaces.

Stay in touch

Sign up for our free newsletter

More from Streetsblog New York City

Bad Data Alert: Council Tears Apart DOT Daylighting Study

The internal review, obtained by Streetsblog, dismantles DOT's fear-mongering.

November 10, 2025

Former DOT Boss: Here’s What Mayor Mamdani Needs as Transportation Commish

Bottom line: The next commissioner needs to be willing to move aside staffers who are unwilling to be change-agents and to empower all the bright (often young) players who embrace the future.

November 10, 2025

Elise Stefanik Wants to Be Governor — Yet Says Nothing About Transit

Elise Stefanik’s campaign launch suggest her intent to use the MTA as a political pawn to stoke fear, not maintain and expand transit.

November 10, 2025

Monday’s Headlines: Car Terror in Brooklyn Edition

Car drivers ran rampant in Boro Park. Plus other news.

November 10, 2025

Trump’s Penn Station Plan Could Saddle New York Commuters With New Fees

Amtrak's plan to privatize the operation of the massive transit hub could open the door to sticking transit riders with extra fees.

November 7, 2025

Q&A: Will The Bronx’s New Council Member Take On Car Culture?

Union leader Shirley Aldebol took on Republican Kristy Marmorato and won — and now she's ready to fight for better transit and safer streets.

November 7, 2025
See all posts