Skip to Content
Streetsblog New York City home
Streetsblog New York City home
Log In
Andrew Cuomo

For Politicians, Congestion Pricing Is an Exercise in Delaying Gratification

Chart: FHWA|

There’s a political payoff from congestion pricing. First you have to get through the “valley of death.”

Sometime in the next month or two, the Cuomo administration is expected to release its congestion pricing plan for New York City. This is when the politics of putting a price on driving get difficult.

A well-crafted congestion pricing plan is a lock to relieve the burden of excess traffic on city streets. There's a reason every city that has adopted a cordon toll system has decided to keep it.

But some cities never find out, because they get mired in what Stockholm transportation director Jonas Eliasson calls the "valley of political death." As congestion pricing gets more attention in public discussion, people can clearly envision the cost of tolls, while the benefits of less traffic and better transit remain intangible or uncertain.

This is the moment when congestion pricing referendums in Manchester, England, and Edinburgh, Scotland, failed. Residents never experienced the benefits of congestion pricing, and they voted against it.

In Stockholm, city officials first instituted congestion pricing as a seven-month trial, followed by a public referendum. Before the trial, public approval stood below 40 percent. Seeing traffic evaporate overnight transformed perception of the policy, which cleared the referendum with over 52 percent of the vote.

By 2011, support stood at nearly 70 percent. The proof was in the pricing.

In London, congestion pricing was enacted in 2003 without a trial or a referendum. It was a signature policy initiative of then-Mayor Ken Livingstone. At the time, Livingstone's proposal to charge drivers to enter the city center was widely panned by politicians and the press.

Then the fees immediately reduced congestion 16 percent. After eight months with the charges in place, public support had gone from around 40 percent to a majority. While traffic speeds have since fallen, the reduction in car volumes has enabled the city to repurpose street space for walking, biking, and transit -- creating a much safer and more efficient surface transportation system.

In New York, polls consistently show support for congestion pricing in the 40 percent range, including the latest survey from Quinnipiac, released in early October. This is in line with public opinion in Stockholm and London before implementation. (Earlier Quinnipiac polls in 2007 and 2008 showed a surge in support for tolling "if the money were used to prevent an increase in mass transit fares and bridge and tunnel tolls" and "if the money were used to improve mass transit in and around New York City.")

For Andrew Cuomo and the other politicians who'll be creating congestion pricing policy, there are a couple of major takeaways.

One, they have to be prepared for some rough moments on the way to implementation. Making congestion pricing happen requires delayed political gratification -- the big public approval payoff only comes once people can experience the benefits in real life.

Two, their plan has to be technically sound. As Eliasson said at a recent event at TransitCenter, policy making is "really the job for experts." The political instinct to carve out exemptions and seek other points of compromise is actually a losing proposition, because it will weaken the impact -- and that will dampen public support after implementation.

For congestion pricing to work as policy and as politics, it has to be made out of strong stuff.

Stay in touch

Sign up for our free newsletter

More from Streetsblog New York City

Outdoor Dining Shrinks Back To Wealthier Neighborhoods as Mayor, Council Point Fingers

Mayor Adams and Speaker Adams blame each other, as New Yorkers suffer the consequences.

March 31, 2025

Locals Outraged, But Political Elite Yawns After a Mom and Two Kids are Killed By Recidivist Speeder

At a funeral amid a neighborhood tragedy, the local Assembly member excuses speeding drivers and says there are "too many" speed cameras.

March 31, 2025

Caught Again! Fly E-Bike Accused of Lying about Battery Safety

The company claims its bikes are inspected and comply with the gold standard for safety, but a lawsuit says it does not.

March 31, 2025

A Faster Future: Unbreaking Passenger Rail to Deliver the Rapid Service We Need

A report released today by the Marron Institute at New York University offers ways to break the intercity rail logjam in America.

March 31, 2025

Monday’s Headlines: Brooklyn Crash ‘Horror’ Edition

Natasha Saada and her daughters died at the hands of a driver with a long record of dangerous behavior behind the wheel. Plus more news.

March 31, 2025
See all posts