So Far Cuomo’s Congestion Pricing “Plan” Is All Sizzle, No Steak

It's not congestion pricing if it doesn't toll the East River bridges.

Gov. Cuomo. Photo: Governor’s Office/Flickr
Gov. Cuomo. Photo: Governor’s Office/Flickr

Andrew Cuomo’s statement to the Times last week that congestion pricing is “an idea whose time has come” set off a wave of optimistic speculation among New Yorkers who care about streets and transit. But the governor has said nothing specific about the congestion pricing plan he has in mind. What little he’s revealed is all sizzle, no steak.

Congestion pricing is one of the single most powerful policies to reduce traffic congestion and speed up transit — especially bus service — and the governor is the one elected official who can singlehandedly make it politically feasible.

The editorial boards at the Times and the Daily News urged Cuomo to adopt a plan along the lines of Move NY, which puts a price on driving across the free East River bridges and 60th Street in Manhattan while reducing tolls on outlying MTA crossings. For-hire trips in the Manhattan congestion zone would be subject to new surcharges.

Like any plan that can reasonably be called “congestion pricing,” Move NY puts a toll cordon around the gridlocked heart of the city. The fact that the cordon applies to all private motor vehicle trips, and there’s no way around it, is what makes it work. If people can still drive into the most congested part of the city at the most congested times of day for free somehow, it’s not congestion pricing.

What Cuomo has been calling “congestion pricing” could very well be something else entirely. Zack Fink at State of Politics reports that “the Cuomo Administration has been signaling to Assembly members that they can do a new pricing plan that does not include East River tolls” and that one representative “says they ‘have heard nothing’ about tolls in this plan.”

There are a number of impostor policies that Cuomo could try to pass off as “congestion pricing” instead: higher peak-hour tolls on MTA crossings, for instance, or incentives for off-peak truck deliveries. These won’t do much to solve New York’s traffic and transit problems. Whatever street space opens up at first will quickly be occupied as motorists figure out the new system and fill the vacuum.

Only a full toll cordon will deliver a substantial long-term reduction in traffic, and with it, the opportunity to vastly improve conditions for surface transit, biking, and walking. (Transportation Alternatives has a petition urging the governor to advance a plan that tolls the East River bridges and a crosstown cordon in Manhattan.)

Cuomo gave a tantalizing quote to the Times last week to relieve the intense public pressure on him to fix a flailing transit system. But the pressure shouldn’t let up now.

Absent more details from the governor, the only reasonable assumption is that he’s still not serious about congestion pricing.

  • AMH

    Thanks for confirming what I already suspected.

  • Reggie

    One of the benefits of the Move NY plan is that it disincentivizes toll-shopping. Higher tolls on the MTA crossings does the opposite of this.

  • stephen_nyc

    While the concept would work, my biggest fear is that the money DOES NOT make it into the transit projects it’s supposed to help. We’ve already seen lockbox accounts get raided for non-approved items. So, if we end up paying tolls to cross the bridges over the East River, how do we ensure that the money goes where it’s supposed to go and stays there (well, until it’s actually spent fixing bus and subway stuff)?
    We don’t need light shows on bridges, we don’t need buses that tell us in an annoying voice and tone to TOUCH YELLOW TAPE TO OPEN DOORS.

  • Joe R.

    More importantly, how can we ensure that the money sent to the subway actually goes for things like repairs, upgrades, and system expansion instead of disappearing into a black hole of higher worker wages and benefits, or higher contractor costs? I would want to know the answer to this before sending the MTA any more money.

  • Larry Littlefield

    While you are being squeezed, just think about the extent to which you are being played — by all of them. There is nothing they can say now that won’t make me even more ticked off than I already am. But there is one thing I can do to make myself less ticked off. Travel by bicycle.

  • DumpsterFire

    We need looser gun laws so people can just shoot their way through the city while hanging out of their vehicles. You know, “freedom” and all that.

  • neillevine
  • stephen_nyc

    Good points, too. Somehow I think the concept of transparency with regards to money and service is lost on the MTA.

  • Andrew

    Yeah, if only the MTA posted detailed operating budget and capital budget information on its website or included each and every proposed service change in its Transit Committee books (for example, the upcoming M1 extension, the revised bus schedules, and the Bx6 SBS, all taking place next month).

    There’s clearly no transparency here!

  • Utin

    Hopefully it isn’t another empty promise

  • I wish I could say I’m surprised, but this fits Cuomo’s pattern of being all-talk, no action on transit improvements.


On Congestion Pricing, Cuomo Plays the Pundit, Not the Governor

Andrew Cuomo knows he’s the governor of New York, right? You couldn’t tell from this exchange about congestion pricing yesterday, via Transportation Nation: Q: Have you seen Sam Schwartz’s revised congestion pricing plan? Do you support it? A: I have not seen it. We’ve talked about congestion pricing for many years. We’ve tried to pass […]

Public Support for NYC Toll Reform Highest in the Suburbs

Since March, Move New York has made the case that its traffic reduction and transit funding plan can succeed in Albany. Proposing to raise car tolls in the transit-rich but congested Manhattan core while lowering them in more distant, car-dependent parts of town, Move NY seeks to avoid the political pitfalls that have sunk road […]