First Look at DOT’s Concept for Better Grand Concourse Bike Lanes

Image: DOT
DOT plans to realign the Grand Concourse service road bike lanes along the medians, then cast them in concrete. Image: DOT

In February, DOT said it would upgrade the bike lanes on the Grand Concourse service roads, and last night the agency showed what it has in mind for the mile-long stretch between 166th Street and 175th Street [PDF].

The first step will be to shift the bike lanes to run along the median instead of the parking lane, reducing conflicts between cyclists and drivers accessing the curb. Later, the bike lanes will be rebuilt at sidewalk grade to provide physical separation from motor vehicles. The timeline for implementing the changes remains uncertain.

The city is currently reconstructing the Grand Concourse from the sewers on up between 161st Street and Fordham Road, a four-phase capital project. Last night’s presentation was an update from DOT on the second phase (covering 166th to 171st) and third phase (171st to 175th) to Bronx Community Board 4’s municipal services committee.

(Phase 1, which runs from 161st Street to 166th Street, was completed back in 2008 without any bike lane upgrades. A separate pedestrian safety project between 138th Street and 158th Street, where there aren’t service roads, doesn’t include any bike lanes, though DOT indicated bikeways could be incorporated into a future capital project for that segment.)

More people are killed while walking on the Grand Concourse than on any other street in the Bronx, according to the Tri-State Transportation Campaign, with 10 pedestrian fatalities along the four-mile street between 2012 and 2014. After Mayor de Blasio launched his Vision Zero initiative, his administration named the Grand Concourse one of four Vision Zero “Great Streets” that are supposed to bake safer designs into reconstruction projects.

Transportation Alternatives’ “Complete the Concourse” campaign has gathered nearly 2,500 signatures calling for protected bike lanes, curb extensions, and bus lanes on the Grand Concourse. Bronx Borough President Ruben Diaz Jr. and local council members Ritchie Torres, Andy Cohen, and Rafael Salamanca Jr. are supporters.

The design concept presented last night does not include bus lanes or alter the wide central roadway of the Concourse. It’s unclear if, in addition to the bike lane upgrades, the redesign will also close or square off the slip lanes between the central roadway and the service roads, as DOT did with its redesign of Queens Boulevard.

Above 161st Street, the Grand Concourse currently has buffered bike lanes on the service roads, but they are frequently obstructed by double-parked cars. Cyclists must also contend with buses merging into the curb lane.

TA Bronx Organizer Erwin Figueroa attended last night’s meeting. He said that median-aligned bike lanes will be an important step forward, but until physical separation from car traffic is provided, illegal parking will still cause problems for cyclists — especially on weekends when churchgoers show little regard for the street’s parking regulations.

“By not having any protection, [those parking violations] will probably continue,” Figueroa said. When he asked DOT reps last night why a barrier won’t be included from the outset, Figueroa was told it would interfere with street sweeping by the median. DOT says it will eventually raise the bike lane to sidewalk elevation, creating physical separation, but has not specified a timetable.

The committee endorsed the new design for Phase 2 of the Grand Concourse, which will get a full CB 4 vote on June 28. DOT said it is still working to finalize the design for Phase 3, which it will present again later.

In the fall, DOT will hold a public workshop about Phase 4, covering 175th Street to Fordham Road.

  • AnoNYC

    Disappointing. Not much of a presentation.

    The DOT is maintaining the Grand Concourse as an alternative to the Major Deegan Expressway for automobiles when it shouldn’t be.

    I want more pedestrian space, I want more predictable traffic, I want bus only lanes, I want physically protected bicycle lanes.

    All this room and we still dedicate so much of it to the automobile.

  • AnoNYC

    On the GC south of E 166th St, no one hangs out on the expanded pedestrian space because they are narrow islands on a speedway.

    ^-In front of the Bronx Museum.

    ^-Other sections discourage pedestrian activity, are only for automotive traffic division and secondary beautification.

    ^-Intersections like this need modification before anyone else is killed.

    ^-Buffer bike lanes are useless without physical separation.

  • Aron

    Who needs wide comfortable bike lanes when you can have 17′ medians amirite.

  • Miles Bader

    Seriously, I mean, I love medians with trees too (though if you’re going to plan trees, why not on the sides?), but I think, say, a 12-13 foot median would be just as nice, and they could then increase both bike-lane and sidewalk width as a result.

  • ahwr

    How wide are the malls on Ocean Parkway? Without a decent buffer space the malls aren’t attractive places to walk/sit. At 12 feet it’s probably just dead space. A suitably traffic calmed service road helps a lot too.

  • ahwr
  • Bernard Finucane

    These streets are so ugly and dangerous that it looks willful.

  • i hope DOT presented an analysis of pedestrian crashes and what features they will install to reduce crashes. How is moving the bike lane helping anything ?

  • Daniel

    In Sweden a road like this has two way cyclepaths on both sides in addition to the dedicated bus lanes. I don’t think the NYC DOT has really studied Vision Zero.

  • AnoNYC

    142 ft of road space available (excluding sidewalks).

    The existing medians are useless because they are too small/narrow. It’s a risk walking to them. Might as well throw all the traffic in the middle, or run it along the side. Dividing up the space is a waste I feel.

  • J

    Once again, DOT refuses to deal with curb usage issues and cyclists are the ones who suffer. They give away curb space cheaply and it is predictably overused (double parking). They reallocate space, but fail to actually deal with the double parking, so it just goes into the bike lane.

    Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.

  • Miles Bader

    Wait, what are “malls”?

    The medians are between traffic lanes, so it doesn’t look like their exact width is going to have much effect on pedestrians.

    A better solution, of course would be to simply get rid of traffic lanes and make the current tree-planted medians the edge of the road.

  • Myra Hill

    They should make the bike lanes similar to the new ones on Queens Blvd. and place barriers to prevent double parking.


Vanessa Gibson Endorses Grand Concourse Protected Bike Lane

Thanks @Vanessalgibson for supporting #CompleteConcourse! Win for #VisionZero and — Thomas DeVito (@PedestrianTom) August 25, 2016 Council Member Vanessa Gibson wants protected bike lanes on the Grand Concourse. After meeting with Bronx Transportation Alternatives volunteers this week, Gibson signed onto the campaign, joining four other council members whose districts include the Concourse. Below 162nd Street, there is no […]