Appeals Court Nixes Murder Conviction of Off-Meds Driver Who Killed Two

Auvryn Scarlett killed two people and injured a third when he crashed a garbage truck after stopping his epilepsy medication. An appeals court reduced his murder conviction but affirmed manslaughter and assault charges. Photo: Daily Mail
Auvryn Scarlett killed two people and injured a third when he crashed a garbage truck while off his epilepsy medication. An appeals court reduced his murder conviction but affirmed manslaughter and assault charges. Photo: Daily Mail

A state appeals court reduced the conviction of a commercial truck driver who killed two Manhattan pedestrians while off his epilepsy medication. According to the New York Law Journal, the ruling cited as precedent a recent decision by the Court of Appeals, New York’s highest court, which prosecutors feared would make it more difficult to bring cases against motorists who kill people.

Auvryn Scarlett had a seizure while driving a garbage truck on W. 35th Street in February 2008, causing the truck to jump the curb and fatally strike British tourists Jacqueline Timmins and Andrew Hardie. A third pedestrian was seriously injured. In a rare instance of a sober New York City driver charged criminally for a fatal crash, Scarlett was convicted of murder and assault.

The BBC covered the trial:

Summing up the prosecution case at New York Supreme Court, assistant district attorney Chris Ryan said Scarlett had shown a complete disregard for the safety of others.

Driving six days a week for the refuse haulage company, he knew he could have a seizure at any time “on some of the busiest streets on earth.”

He said: “It is like playing a game of Russian roulette, only instead of pointing the gun at yourself, you point it at other people. And if someone dies — that is murder.”

Prosecutors said Scarlett stopped taking his medication two weeks before the crash and did not tell his employer or the DMV he had epilepsy. At sentencing, according to the Law Journal, the judge said Scarlett stopped taking his medication because it “interfered with [his] enjoyment of liquor.”

Last week the Appellate Division, First Department of the state Supreme Court reduced Scarlett’s murder conviction to manslaughter and his first degree assault conviction to second degree assault.

The appeals court said both the murder and first-degree assault charges require the defendant to have displayed a depraved indifference to human life. But Scarlett’s crimes did not exhibit that level of depravity, Justices Peter Tom, Rolando Acosta, Rosalyn Richter and Barbara Kapnick agreed in an unsigned ruling.

“They [the crimes] do not fit the category of cases where the conduct is at least as morally reprehensible as intentional murder,” the court said, citing People v. Maldonado, 24 NY3d 48 (2014). “The People failed to establish that the defendant also possessed an ‘utter disregard for the value of human life.'”

In 2014 the Court of Appeals ruled that Jose Maldonado, who killed Violetta Krzyzak as he was pursued by police through Greenpoint, did not act with “depraved indifference” and “disregard for human life” because he did not intentionally hit more people and cars with the stolen minivan he was driving. According to the ruling, Maldonado did not brake after hitting Krzyzak, who “landed over 165 feet, or almost one block, away from the point of collision.” The court reduced Maldonado’s sentence from murder to manslaughter.

While disagreeing with the murder conviction, the appellate court found the evidence against Scarlett “clearly” proved “the recklessness necessary to sustain convictions for manslaughter and second-degree assault,” the Law Journal reported.

Scarlett began serving a term of 20 years to life in prison in 2009. His sentence will be reduced to a maximum of five to 15 years.

Maureen McCormick, head vehicular crimes prosecutor for the Nassau County district attorney’s office, has for years warned that court rulings and poorly-drafted state laws are handicapping cases against New York motorists accused of serious crimes. She sent us the following statement:

This was another incredibly disheartening decision that continues to chip away at a prosecutor’s ability to hold the most egregious vehicular crimes’ defendants responsible for their acts. It is certainly bad enough when the driver of a car fails to take his anti-seizure medication, crashes and causes injury or death; but when our courts believe it is the same level crime for a commercial garbage truck driver to willfully hide his epilepsy to illegally obtain a commercial driver’s license, to willfully stop taking his medication because it interferes with his consumption of alcohol and then to continue driving a truck weighing around 60,000 pounds on NYC densely populated streets until he blacks out and kills two people and seriously injures a third, the question must be asked: what is wrong with this system? What happened to the role of the jury? And if these recent interpretations of depraved indifference are the definitions that will, again, tie vehicular prosecutors’ hands, then where is the legislature?

Marco Conner, counsel for Transportation Alternatives, said the Scarlett decision could be interpreted as confirmation that serious charges were appropriate. Wrote Conner via email:

This should not have a chilling effect on prosecutors’ decision to pursue serious charges for reckless driving that kills or injures others. Although the reduction will likely cause prosecutors to reconsider murder charges where intent or a “depraved indifference to human life” is not clear-cut, the manslaughter and second degree assault charges here remain very serious offenses, both being felonies that carry heavy incarceration penalties. It is not clear that you need stronger deterrence than that. We just need [district attorneys] to routinely charge drivers who kill and maim through arguably reckless driving. It can’t be an occasional response.

Also, the court didn’t question that the driver’s behavior was criminally reckless and indefensible and caused the death of the two tourists — it reaffirmed that.

In other words, the decision is not an excuse for New York City prosecutors to fail to bring criminal charges when warranted.

  • armyvet00

    So disappointing that Judge Jenny Rivera’s horrible reasoning in People v. Maldonado has led to yet another driver not being held accountable to the fullest extent their actions deserve.

  • I get the feeling that prosecutors feel they have to be absolutely certain of making every charge they bring stick. So it’s impossible – tragically – that this won’t deter prosecutors for going after negligent motorists. The problem, however, seems to me less the law than a legislature that’s unwilling to change laws like this when they’re so clearly inadequate.

  • Brian Howald

    I posted this article to facebook, and preceded to get into an argument with someone who called this both a tragedy and an accident. I’m really not sure how to convince people who believe that anything less than intent is anything more than accidental. Anyone have any persuasive suggestions?

  • mattkime

    responsibility levels are a continuum. on one end you have someone who is carefully aware and considerate of their actions. on the other end you have recklessness with no concern for consequence.

    if you spend enough time recklessly operating a motor vehicle then death or injury rises from probability to certainty. simply because you dislike the results of your actions does not mean they’re an accident.

  • Brad Aaron

    The driver knowingly stopped medication that he needs to control seizures and continued to drive a large truck on the streets of NYC. Neither of those actions was accidental.

    Of course some people won’t be convinced regardless.

  • ahwr

    >So it’s impossible – tragically – that this won’t deter prosecutors for going after negligent motorists.

    Why? He’s still in prison and convicted of manslaughter. Does it not count as ‘going after’ negligent motorists if they aren’t charged with second degree murder, but instead with manslaughter?

  • ADN

    What I sometimes do in these cases is spell out a specific example of an incident. I, essentially, describe in detail the incidents that killed Allie Liao or Cooper Stock — children walking across the street, in the crosswalk, legally with the right-of-way, holding the hand of their grandmother and father and captured on video so there is absolutely no doubt what happened.

    Then I ask the person who is arguing for motorist exoneration: Do you think that’s an “accident?” Do you think nothing should happen to the driver in these cases? Even if you believe jail or manslaughter charges are too severe, do you think this is a person who should still be allowed to drive a large, powerful, dangerous motor vehicle in a big, crowded city?

  • Joe R.

    I would be really happy if every driver who killed or seriously injured someone was banned from driving for life. Additional jail time would just be the icing on the cake. What bothers me the most here isn’t the fact the charges were reduced. He’ll be doing hard time anyway. Rather, it’s the fact there was no mention of revoking his driving privileges for good. He may well go back to driving trucks after getting out of jail when he shouldn’t be allowed to drive anything larger or heavier than a bicycle.

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

DA Robert Johnson: Manslaughter Charges for Cab Driver Who Killed Two

|
District Attorney Robert Johnson has filed felony charges against the green cab driver who killed two people on a Bronx sidewalk. Johnson’s office told Gothamist Emilio Garcia was off his epilepsy medication when he hit 5-year-old Tierre Clark and Kadeem Brown, 25, at the Grand Concourse and E. 170th Street on March 20. Reports published after the crash […]

Jury Reaches Guilty Verdict in Rare Murder Trial of Sober Driver

|
The garbage truck driver who struck and killed two British tourists in Manhattan last February was convicted on two counts of second-degree murder yesterday. Auvryn Scarlett was off his epilepsy medication the night he had a seizure behind the wheel on W. 35th Street between Fifth and Sixth Avenues. The truck jumped the curb and […]

When a Driver Had a Seizure and Killed Two in Manhattan, It Was Murder

|
One day after a fatal crash at this intersection, drivers – including the NYPD – blatantly run the red. pic.twitter.com/0qTq39gDn2 — Brooklyn Spoke (@BrooklynSpoke) July 14, 2015 The motorist who killed a cyclist and injured several others in Brooklyn yesterday told police he had a seizure after he did not take his medication. If the driver’s […]