Will de Blasio and Mark-Viverito Back Effort to Fully Fund Vision Zero?

bdb-mmv

City Hall will have to double its commitment to street redesigns that prioritize safety in order to dramatically reduce traffic deaths on NYC’s most dangerous streets in our lifetimes, advocates say. That level of spending could be accomplished with a relatively small shift in resources in the city’s total capital budget.

Transportation Alternatives has drafted a letter to Mayor de Blasio asking the administration to dedicate additional resources to redesigning the city’s most dangerous streets. On Monday, more than 100 volunteers for TA and Families For Safe Streets visited council members seeking their support, and so far 19 have signed on.

Advocates want the city to both double its planned investment in Vision Zero capital projects — permanent street redesigns cast in concrete — and scale up its “operational” projects — redesigns made with paint and other low-cost materials that can quickly bring down the death toll on city streets. They also emphasize the need for solid timetables for implementation, to ensure the city stays on track to meet its goals.

On the capital side, that would mean spending $2.4 billion every 10 years to overhaul the most dangerous streets. TA says that level of investment could comprehensively redesign the city’s arterial streets within 50 years.

While that would represent a large increase, it would not be a large share of the city’s total capital budget, which amounted to about $80 billion over the 10-year period from 2003 to 2012. A faster street reconstruction timetable could also save the city money in the long run by reducing lifecycle maintenance costs.

Mayor de Blasio’s “Great Streets” initiative committed $250 million over several years for redesigns of four arterials, including Queens Boulevard and the Grand Concourse, and the preliminary City Council budget recommends doubling that amount. That would be progress, but it’s no substitute for a detailed, long-term funding and implementation strategy.

Outside of the Great Streets program, for instance, DOT is planning just 50 Vision Zero projects a year citywide, some no bigger than a single intersection. That’s not nearly enough to meet the need for street safety upgrades.

“Neighborhoods across the five boroughs are really clamoring for safety improvements on local streets, so there’s an unprecedented demand for what we know are proven fixes,” says TA Deputy Director Caroline Samponaro. “That presents a challenge for the city, but it’s ultimately an opportunity for us to invest in what the next generation of New York City streets should look like.”

In the letter to the mayor, TA calls for a comprehensive plan to redesign all arterials within 50 years, with published deadlines. Timelines should be accelerated on priority projects, TA says, and the city’s capital funding process should be changed to accommodate fast-tracked construction. In addition, DOT’s short-term “operational” projects should focus on quickly improving the 443 miles of streets with the highest fatality rates, as identified by DOT’s pedestrian safety action plans released earlier this year.

“If we’re going to keep the same level of reductions we saw last year in traffic crashes, and even accelerate it, we’re going to need to do more projects, and I think that’s going to require the DOT to have the capacity to do that,” says Samponaro.

Streetsblog asked the mayor’s office and City Council Speaker Melissa Mark-Viverito about TA’s Vision Zero budget recommendations.

“Achieving Vision Zero is a core priority for the administration,” said de Blasio spokesperson Wiley Norvell via email. “From lowering the citywide speed limit, to increasing enforcement against hazardous driving, to completely redesigning dangerous corridors like Queens Boulevard, we are backing up that commitment with the resources to get results. Last year, the first year of Vision Zero, was the safest year for pedestrians since record-keeping began in 1910. We will continue to focus on these priorities. We look forward to working with the Council throughout the budget process.”

“The City Council is proud to have passed over a dozen bills to make New York City’s streets safer and we will be reviewing these proposals,” said Mark-Viverito spokesperson Robin Levine in an emailed statement.

  • com63

    Can we offer cash bonuses to NYPD officers who arrest drivers under the right of way law? Enforcement of vision zero priorities seems to be lacking and more money probably won’t fix that.

  • Huh?

    How is Mayor de Blasio going to eliminate traffic fatalities by 2025, as he promised, if even with TA’s proposal we won’t be able to redesign every major arterial for another 50 years? Or is Vision Zero over, the promise broken, and now we’ve moved on to just trying hard to all do our part?

  • JudenChino

    Well some of that money is going to ads as I heard DoT and the Vision Zero initiative while listening to the Mets game on the radio yesterday. So that’s something.

  • AnoNYC

    Even 50 years is unreasonable. Repaint the damn streets as soon as possible then install more permanent infrastructure over time.

  • That’s what the TA letter calls for — redesign the 443 miles of the city’s most dangerous streets ASAP with cheaper materials, and double the capital budget for street reconstructions so those can be built out in concrete twice as fast as the current pace.

  • Larry Littlefield

    The question is, will they put up $800 million per year for the MTA capital plan. And will someone assign them their share of the blame if they don’t.

    Or will not one be assigned any share of the blame, except the sucker who is in office when the system collapses.

  • AnoNYC

    That’s exactly the way it should be done and today I notice more and more permanent infrastructure than ever before. Almost every new project in the Bronx I have seen in the last few months for instance. It’s nice to see but as mentioned, that paint and flexible bollard sticks go a long way.

    I wonder how much it would cost to “repaint the city.”

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

De Blasio DOT Budget Fails to Meet de Blasio Vision Zero Timetable [Updated]

|
#VisionZero FY17 funding includes $115M for street capital construction projects, $59M for #SafeRoutestoSchools, pic.twitter.com/32I5cgBYbJ — NYC DOT (@NYC_DOT) March 2, 2016 Update below Mayor de Blasio’s proposed DOT budget again falls well short of what’s needed to implement life-saving street redesigns within the time frame prescribed by Vision Zero. The mayor’s preliminary FY 2017 budget allocates $115 million […]

TA: Quicker Action on Vision Zero Can Save Thousands of Lives

|
The de Blasio administration is making progress on street safety, but not fast enough to achieve the mayor’s Vision Zero target of eliminating traffic deaths by 2024, Transportation Alternatives says in a new report. At the current rate of improvement, it will take nearly 40 years to reach that goal. Advocates from TA, Families for Safe Streets, […]

De Blasio’s Budget Has No Funding Increase for Street Safety Projects

|
Mayor de Blasio released his executive budget yesterday, and it does not include the increases for street safety projects that the City Council recommended earlier this month, says Transportation Alternatives. Without more funding for street redesigns, TA says, the administration won’t be able to improve safety at the pace needed to attain the mayor’s stated goal of eliminating traffic […]

Rodriguez: Wouldn’t DOT Like More Vision Zero Funding? Trottenberg: Nope

|
The de Blasio administration continues to resist the City Council’s efforts to devote more resources to street redesigns that will save lives. Speaking at a transportation committee hearing yesterday, Transportation Commissioner Polly Trottenberg said DOT has sufficient funding in the city budget to redesign, within six to seven years, the 292 dangerous intersections where most fatal traffic crashes occur. That […]