Skip to Content
Streetsblog New York City home
Streetsblog New York City home
Log In

When cars were first introduced, writes Jason Segedy at Notes from the Underground, they appeared to signify a tremendous advance for personal mobility and freedom. But Segedy -- who heads Akron's metropolitan planning agency, AMATS -- notes that over time, what has become a near-total reliance on cars for transportation has infringed on our freedom in important and sometimes difficult-to-recognize ways:

A bus stop on Flight Memorial Drive in Copley Township outside Akron, Ohio. The freedom and mobility that cars offer comes at a high price for those who don't drive. Photo: Jason Segedy
A bus stop on Flight Memorial Drive in Copley Township outside Akron, Ohio. The freedom and mobility that cars offer comes at a high price, especially for people who don't drive. Photo: Jason Segedy
false

Cars are a wonderful convenience for many of us, but they are primarily considered such a great convenience because we have collectively built a society where we have to travel long distances, and therefore need cars.

The very rationale for their convenience is a bit of a circular argument, and it's worth considering that it hasn’t always been that way.

Before the automobile was invented, most people had a fairly convenient and quick way to get where they needed to go -- it was called walking. Cities and towns were built to be navigated easily on foot, and barring long trips to distant locales, most people could get to almost everywhere they needed to go in 20 minutes, just like most of us can today -- but without having to own or operate a car.

Yes, the car has helped us cover long distances more effectively. But it has also made us travel long distances for things that we didn’t always have to -- a loaf of bread, a haircut, a postage stamp, or a box of nails.

We all pay dearly for that freedom now, Segedy writes, through the high personal costs of owning cars, the high public costs of car infrastructure, and the high environmental and social costs that cars impose. And the people who pay the highest price, Segedy says, are those who don't drive. And we tend to forget that:

We’ve reordered our entire society; our built environment; even our very way of life, to serve this machine that we were told would serve us.

If only more transportation agencies had such thoughtful leadership.

Elsewhere on the Network today: Biking in LA shares word of a new study finding drivers give more passing room to cyclists in bike lanes. And Streets.mn explains how small towns use the principles of urbanism to boost tourism.

Stay in touch

Sign up for our free newsletter

More from Streetsblog New York City

How Mamdani Can Fix NYC’s Neglected Greenways

This vital transportation infrastructure needs a lot of TLC by the new mayor.

January 26, 2026

Cycle of Rage: NYC Is A HELLSCAPE For Pedestrians

We can apportion the blame later in the day, but the greatest walkable city in North America is completely impassible to people on foot or in wheelchairs.

January 26, 2026

Gov. Hochul’s Car Insurance Proposal is a Disaster for Crash Victims’ Rights

As a state that values walking and biking, we cannot allow the governor to gut the rights of the people most at risk — especially since it won't lower insurance rates anyway.

January 26, 2026

Universal School Streets Will Be a Heavy Lift for Mamdani: Advocates

Can New York be the Paris of America? Mayor Mamdani will have to get to work on the DOT's "School Streets" program to make that happen.

January 26, 2026

Monday’s Headlines: Deliver the Goods Edition

Delivery workers braving the snow have more money in their pockets after judges threw out two app company lawsuits on Friday. Plus more news.

January 26, 2026

Driverless Vehicles — Who Needs Them?

That headline is not sarcastic — I mean it literally: Who will benefit from driverless cars?

January 26, 2026
See all posts