De Blasio on Vision Zero: “We Have to Act Right Now to Protect Lives”

London’s pedestrian fatality rate has fallen faster than New York’s in part, the Vision Zero report says, because of stronger laws against dangerous drivers and robust automated enforcement. Image: NYC Mayor’s Office

At PS 75 on the Upper West Side today, just blocks from where 9-year-old Cooper Stock was struck and killed by a turning taxi driver last month, Mayor de Blasio released the blueprint [PDF] for how his administration will achieve Vision Zero, its goal of eliminating traffic deaths within a decade.

“We have to act right now to protect lives,” de Blasio said. With elected officials to his left and families of traffic violence victims to his right, the mayor said that he sees “this mission in terms of our core responsibility in government, which is the health and safety of our people.”

“It’s about much more than speed bumps and the issuing of violations. It’s also about all of us taking greater responsibility,” de Blasio said. “Every time we get behind the wheel and every time we step out into the street, our lives are in each others’ hands.”

The report is focused squarely on deadly and dangerous driving, and most of the attention at today’s press conference — from the mayor and press alike — focused on traffic enforcement, with street redesigns trailing closely.

“Over the last five years, 70 percent of incidents involving pedestrian fatalities involve the issue of speed or failure to yield,” Police Commissioner Bill Bratton said. “The department’s efforts going forward will focus very significantly on those types of violations.” This is a shift for Bratton, who at last month’s press conference unveiling the Vision Zero agenda said 73 percent of collisions are due to pedestrian error.

Today’s press conference was just blocks from the busy intersection of West 96th Street and Broadway, where the 24th Precinct launched a jaywalking crackdown last month, and the first question from the press today was about whether Vision Zero would include jaywalking tickets. De Blasio said, as he did last month, that jaywalking tickets are not part of the Vision Zero agenda, but added that precinct commanders have discretion to issue summonses to pedestrians if they deem it necessary.

A grin spread across Bratton’s face as the reporter asked about jaywalking. “With our resources, we’re going to put our focus on where we can have the most impact, most quickly,” he said, “And that is on dealing with the vehicular component.”

Bratton announced that Chief Thomas Chan, who took over NYPD’s community affairs bureau last April, has been tapped to head the Transportation Bureau. Bratton added that TrafficStat, the department’s street safety initiative, would play a significant role in Vision Zero. “Chief Chan proposes to immediately open that up to the entities that are involved in this plan, so we can share our information,” he said.

The plan also calls for more safety oversight of for-hire vehicles and stronger consequences for taxi and livery drivers. “TLC drivers play a particular role in our city; they set the tone on our streets,” de Blasio said.

“Livery, yellow, non-commercial drivers — everyone should be held accountable,” said Transportation Committee chair Ydanis Rodriguez, himself a former livery driver. “We have to reduce the number of fatalities in our city.”

Some of the big changes de Blasio is proposing require cooperation from Albany, and the mayor thanked Governor Cuomo for his “strong support” of speed cameras. The Vision Zero report calls for city control over the number of cameras used for speeding and red light enforcement. Under current law, Albany has to enact any addition to automated enforcement cameras in New York.

De Blasio called reducing the speed limit “the most holistic way to approach the problem with our partners in Albany,” and spoke of the wide-ranging impact lower speed limits could have. “The default speed limits on streets filled with pedestrians shouldn’t be at a level that could be fatal to pedestrians,” the mayor said. “They have to be at a level that will give a maximum chance of saving pedestrians’ lives.”

For its part, DOT would expand many of its safety programs, with a focus on re-engineering large arterial streets that are particularly dangerous for pedestrians. Signal retiming and lower speed limits on major arterials could be enacted soon, and, like the recent speed limit reduction on Prospect Park West, would not require state action.

De Blasio emphasized the important role local elected officials and community groups play in street safety projects. “They’re in the best position to help us achieve these goals because they realize how urgent this is to the people we represent,” he said. “People are demanding very tangible and local solutions they can see and feel, and that’s what we intend to do.”

After today’s event, Manhattan Borough President Gale Brewer spoke about the advisory role of community boards. Brewer’s office has gathered a list of traffic safety hotspots from community boards, and encouraged other borough presidents to do the same. “They know what the problem is — speeding, turns, crossings, seniors, schools,” she said of community boards. “In my experience, the community board is not always adept at figuring out what has to be done.”

“When there’s a compelling safety issue, really it’s a matter of life and death, if the community board for whatever reason is not acting, then DOT needs to move forward,” said Council Member Mark Levine, who like other council members has urged the city to implement street safety plans over the objections of community boards. “I’m happy that DOT is given CB input, but at the end of the day, I think we need to reserve the option of DOT moving forward,” Levine said.

“There is a sense of moral imperative and urgency here, and we are going to bring that to our work with communities,” Transportation Commissioner Polly Trottenberg told Streetsblog. “But we have to be partners with them. You have to balance that.”

“In putting design changes in a Vision Zero framework, it’s going to be much easier for communities to understand the benefits that these changes bring to their streets,” Transportation Alternatives Executive Director Paul Steely White said. “Given the urgency of Vision Zero, will we see a commensurate urgency in the application of additional resources to fix those dangerous streets? We’re all hoping the answer to that is yes.”

White noted that the mayor’s budget did not include a major boost for street safety, but that the months-long budget process currently underway could yield additional resources for DOT.

“We are working with the mayor’s office and OMB to look at everything we’re doing internally and figure out how we can best allocate our existing resources,” said Trottenberg. “If we need to do more going forward, then we’re going to have that discussion with City Hall.”

White said that he is counting on council members to make street safety a priority during budget negotiations. First, though, the council will hold an oversight hearing on the mayor’s Vision Zero agenda next Monday.

“The hearing will be the first formal discussion that we’ll have at a city level,” Rodriguez said. “We expect to have the commissioners from Mayor de Blasio’s administration at the hearing.”

For some, today’s event was about more than just policies and hearings. “You don’t assume that something like crossing the street could turn into something this big,” said Greg Thompson, whose 16-year-old sister Renee was killed by a turning truck driver on the Upper East Side last September. “The abundance of support, including the mayor’s, is something I didn’t expect. I’m definitely grateful for that.”

“If you speak up and you step into their offices,” he said, “then they do listen, and that’s what surprised me most.”

  • StepUpAndSaySomething

    Glad Bill is continuing with the message. The real test now is turning it onto action.

  • Joe Enoch

    So do we think that perhaps Bratton was just confused before when he said 73 percent of pedestrians were at fault? He never mentioned it again and never cited any sources. Do we think he meant 73 percent of vehicles — which is more in line with the data provided today? I’m hoping that’s the case. In order for a lot of these changes to be effective, we need the support of the NYPD commissioner — and that will only come from the top.

  • anonym

    I think we established before that the actual number from the very small statistical sample was 7.3 percent – somebody misplaced a decimal point.

  • TomG

    Sounds like progress to me.

  • Kevin Love

    Why is Mr. de Blasio comparing New York with London? As Robert Wright and many other people here will attest, London is far from being a good example.

    The Netherlands has the safest streets in the world. Why do we not use Dutch cities as our example?

  • Nick Malinowski

    will the NYPD be held accountable for the deaths they inflict on pedestrians?

  • qrt145

    I think it’s to avoid complaints (however unfounded) that the Netherlands is like a big farm and thus not comparable to NYC. London, on the other hand, is a “global metropolis” that people here can identify with. And despite its problems, it has half our street killing rate, so it’s a start…

  • qatzelok

    I think you answered your own question. “Aim low.” Many Canadians compare our cities to American cities. Again, this is “aim low.”

  • 1) London has a lower traffic death rate than Amsterdam.
    2) London is much more comparable to NYC in terms of size than any Dutch city.
    3) As the graph shows, 25 years ago, London and NYC had almost the same traffic death rate. The fact that London now has half the rate of NYC is a clear illustration that policy choices can save lives.

    There’s a lot we can learn from the Netherlands, but there’s also a lot we can learn from London.

  • Kevin Love

    One of my major concerns is learning the wrong lessons from London. One of their tools for street safety is fencing in pedestrians like cattle, while giving free reign for motor vehicles on the streets. It works, but that’s not the kind of city I want to live in.

    In the same way, cycling in London has been strongly discouraged by official policy encouraging motor vehicle traffic. It is about four times as dangerous to be a cyclist in the UK than in The Netherlands. Let’s copy the good example, not the bad one. Source:

    In terms of size, unlike New York, Amsterdam was not politically amalgamated with its suburbs. The population of the Amsterdam conurban known as the Randstad is well over 7 million people. This places New York and Amsterdam in the same league of big cities, and there are a large number of solutions that can be imported from Amsterdam. And from Utrecht, The Hague and Rotterdam, the component elements of the Randstad.

  • Albert

    I hope I’m not comparing apples and oranges, but what strikes me about the above chart is that the drop in pedestrian fatality rates over ~25 years for both London & NYC is several times the size of even the largest difference between London’s & NYC’s rates. What factors caused the overall drop, and shouldn’t cities be doing more of those factors?

  • Read the report. There’s nothing about pedestrian fences in there. The lessons drawn from London are that automated enforcement and stricter vehicular crimes laws work.

  • Jonathan

    Very good point you make. It seems to me that the missing partner from the Vision Zero initiative is the MTA, and the missing initiative is road pricing. Without those in New York, it seems that we are consigned to a policy of tolerating motor vehicles while exhorting their operators to put safety first. You can’t get Dutch streets without Dutch rails.

  • Kevin Love

    The lesson from Dutch cities is that infrastructure works far, far better than enforcement.

    This is the heart of my concern: The wrong lesson is being drawn if we use London as our point of comparison.

    The #1 determinant of safety is infrastructure. The Dutch CROW traffic and street design engineering standards provide a “plug and play” engineering standard that can be easily implemented to make ANY city much, much better.

    That is why The Netherlands has such a consistent standard of excellence in widely diverse cities. They have an engineering standard for infrastructure that works. London and New York do not.

  • There are solid commitments in the report to redesigning streets. But if you want to eliminate traffic deaths, enforcement is a huge part of the solution.

    The Netherlands has the world’s best bike infrastructure, and that has made streets safer and we need more of that here in NYC. But even with the inferior design of British streets, London has a lower traffic death rate than Amsterdam and the UK has a lower traffic death rate than the Netherlands.

    It would be irresponsible of the city to emulate one place to the exclusion of all others that have attained drastic reductions in traffic deaths.

  • oriordan

    Of course in London, there is no jaywalking law and pedestrians can cross the road where ever and when ever they like although they may be taking their life in their hands by doing so….


Vision Zero and the Challenge of Culture Change

This is the first post in a two-part piece about how Vision Zero will have to change attitudes toward streets and driving in order to succeed. City Council Member Mark Weprin’s Vision Zero moment came after watching video footage of the collision that killed 3-year-old Allison Liao in Flushing, Queens, last October. The driver of […]

Vision Zero: Where Do We Go From Here?

John Petro is a policy analyst for New York City affairs and the co-author of “Vision Zero: How Safer Streets in New York City Can Save More Than 100 Lives a Year.” Mayor Bill de Blasio released his administration’s Vision Zero Action Plan earlier this week, following up on a high-profile campaign promise just six […]