Q&A: How Does StreetsPAC Judge Candidates’ Commitment to Safer Streets?

NYC’s first livable streets political action committee, StreetsPAC, released its first round of endorsements today. The committee threw its support to five City Council candidates, including two who are looking to unseat incumbents.

In the race to succeed Peter Vallone Jr. of Queens, StreetsPAC endorsed Costa Constantinides in District 22. Constantinides is a Democratic District Leader and City Council aide “who believes that ‘safe streets are the lifelines of every thriving neighborhood,'” according to a StreetsPAC press release.

In District 34, which includes Williamsburg, Bushwick, and Ridgewood, StreetsPAC supports Antonio Reynoso, chief of staff for term-limited Diana Reyna. Reynoso, who became a bike commuter after selling his car, wants to calm truck traffic and expand the city’s bike lane network, according to StreetsPAC.

Carlos Menchaca gets the nod from StreetsPAC in District 38, which covers Brooklyn neighborhoods including Borough Park, Gowanus, Sunset Park, and Windsor Terrace. A “regular bicycle commuter” who would like the city to extend the Brooklyn Greenway from Red Hook to Sunset Park, Menchaca is running against incumbent Sara Gonzalez. He has worked for Marty Markowitz and Christine Quinn.

Former banker Vince Morgan is running against Inez Dickens, in Upper Manhattan’s District 9. StreetsPAC says Morgan is “sharply critical” of Dickens’ indifference to safety on deadly Adam Clayton Powell Jr. Boulevard, which his children cross to get to school.

Finally, StreetsPAC endorsed Council Member Melissa Mark-Viverito, in Manhattan District 8, for reelection. Mark-Viverito, whose district stretches from East Harlem to the South Bronx, is one of the council’s strongest voices for safer streets. “The Councilmember would like to see significant improvements to pedestrian access to her district’s East River Plaza shopping mall, and better bicycle and pedestrian access to the Willis Avenue Bridge,” says StreetsPAC.

We asked StreetsPAC founding member and Upper Green Sider Glenn McAnanama about the council member endorsement process, and what they’re seeing from candidates for borough president. See what he had to say after the jump.

Streetsblog: How are you deciding which council incumbents to target?

Glenn McAnanama: Those that are in competitive races and did not turn in a StreetsPAC questionnaire have made themselves targets. Neither Inez Dickens nor Sara Gonzalez turned in a questionnaire or responded to us in any way. We are focusing first on races where we think we can make a difference and where the challenger is trying to draw a comparison on livable streets issues against the incumbent. There’s also an eye on the inevitable race for speaker of the City Council. Inez Dickens’ name has been floated as a potential City Council speaker and we think her record on street safety and prioritizing mass transit on streets in her low-car-ownership district has been especially dismal. Vince Morgan is advocating for safety improvements to be accelerated along main avenues in Harlem like Adam Clayton Powell Boulevard and Select Bus Service for all of 125th Street. We think that direct comparison will motivate a lot of volunteers and donors to flock to his campaign.

SB: In the open seat races, how much of a role did your questionnaires play?

GM: We only interview candidates that have submitted questionnaires so they are pivotal to our consideration. The questionnaire responses give us a basis to prioritize their district over other districts. In many districts, the contrast between the candidates often hinges on just a few key points. That’s when we need to interview them to really get to know them better. And we’ve found all of our interactions to be fairly positive with candidates. Just having a conversation with them can help us find common ground on some issues. We also look at their viability on a number of factors like fundraising, other endorsements, prior experience, etc.

SB: What’s the return rate on the questionnaires for council candidates?

GM: We tried to reach every council candidate and received over 60 responses — many of those from highly contested races in Manhattan and Brooklyn where livable streets issues are almost taken for granted now. But for instance we received three from council District 19, which is a very car-oriented section of Queens. Our policy is that we will be happy to receive responses from all candidates in races that we haven’t made an endorsement in yet. That leaves 46 council races where we have not endorsed a candidate, along with all borough and citywide offices.

SB: Do you plan to endorse in all contested council races?

GM: We have not decided that yet. We may choose to make a statement about a race pointing to the pros of various good candidates and the cons of one or more other candidates without making a specific single endorsement. Before the primary, I think we will have either an endorsement or a statement about the races where candidates have submitted questionnaires. We are very consensus driven.

SB: How about the races for borough president?

GM: We did interview the three Manhattan borough president candidates who completed a questionnaire — [Julie] Menin, [Jessica] Lappin, and [Gale] Brewer. The board could not come to a conclusion on that race yet, but we will be discussing this in the upcoming endorsement rounds. In the meantime, if a Manhattan BP candidate wanted to step up a few notches and really make a public pitch to the livable streets community with some big ideas, that might force our hand quicker. Also we are very interested in the Brooklyn DA’s race and have only received one questionnaire response so far. We’re also very interested in hearing from #streetsvoters about who they like in their area and why. Tweet us!

  • Daphna

    What about Mel Wymore for city council district 6 and Mark Levine for city council district 7? These two are running for seats where the incumbent is term limited out. They are both strong on transit and livable streets issues. They first have to win the primary in September which is quite crowded with many running.

  • tyler

    That’s not the Federally mandated uppercase/lowercase combination in that street sign! 🙂

  • Thank you, Glen, for doing all of this vetting. I hope it makes voting a bit easier and it will educate the candidates too.

    I’m deeply concerned that livable streets issues are becoming too closely associated with the glittery parts of Brooklyn and Manhattan when these issues are of dire importance to the whole city and frankly are even MORE important in parts of the city not associated with things like “urban amenities” or safe streets.

    Some people will cynically try to use this against the movement by sending the signal that it’s just a bunch of frufru stuff that “real people” can’t be bothered with when nothing could be further from the truth.

    There are few issue more central to the health of a city than the quality of the streets, transportation and built environment. It’s really the most basic thing that governments do: they manage the public space and shape it.

    I don’t know why people assume this is something that can just happen without careful thought and planning.

    I don’t know if winning over places where most people drive and where the density is lower will be easy– but it’s still worth trying in deep Queens and SI. However, neighborhoods like Harlem, Yankee Stadium, The Hub, Hunts Point, Inwood, Washington Heights, Jackson Heights etc. are not car-centric places! Most people can’t afford a car. Our sidewalks and parks are all that we have. (that and a few bike lanes, for those who are able to ride)

    It’s just that the “black cars” have their lobby and the drivers tend to be the most wealthy and most *noisy* residents so the elected officials THINK that they are serving us by worrying about parking and other such issues.(I’m pretty noisy myself but I’m just one woman!)

    What we really need is major traffic calming, those good-looking green bike lanes (not just the boring sharrows), plazas with chairs and tables and more space for normal people! More places for kids to play! There are so many young people every park is packed to the gills, this is not a joke. This is about safety for our kids so they can play and breathe the air and stay healthy physically and emotionally.

    Thank you again for your hard work!

  • Mike

    I’d like to make a small donation to each of these candidates and allow them to get the matching funds. But that’s a pain in the neck. Can the PAC send out an email that would allow us to make one donation that would be split equally?

  • Eric McClure

    Daphna, stay tuned for more StreetsPAC endorsements. Reviewing questionnaires and interviewing candidates takes time.

    People can help that process by contributing and signing up to volunteer at http://www.streetspac.org.

  • mr moneybags (ok not really)

    It’d be nice if there was a monthly donation thing like there is for streetsblog.

  • Daphna

    Manhattan Community Board 10 (Central Harlem) rejects every safer street re-design presented. They did not want traffic calming on Adam Clayton Powell in the form of either a buffered bike lane or a wider median with pedestrian refuges and left turn bays. This later plan was installed by the DOT without CB10 approval. Inez Dickens does not stand up for safer streets, nor does she use her influence to bring good street changes to the neighborhood, nor does she seek to educate her constituents about accepting positive changes to the streets. Many CB10 members are appointed by her. She could change the bad decision making going on at CB10 by appointing different people but has not done so. I would welcome Vince Morgan winning over her in Manhattan District 9!

  • Eric McClure

    Mike, StreetsPAC will be giving more than the matchable maximum of $175 to each of the candidates endorsed today, so while it may take a few minutes to donate to each individually, that’ll maximize your impact. Donations to StreetsPAC, on the other hand, will allow us to help more candidates with more significant amounts, and will be tied directly and unmistakably to a Livable Streets agenda. Why not do both? 😉

  • Guest

    I was coming down to make exactly the same comment – not MUTCD compliant!

    Seeing as this is a common reaction among people who care about these things, a revised logo would be highly recommended.


StreetsPAC Issues Endorsements for State Senate and Assembly Races

With primaries coming in a few weeks, StreetsPAC today announced its first round of endorsements for state-level offices, and its first endorsements for candidates outside NYC. NYC’s first-ever livable streets political action committee threw its support to five candidates for the Assembly and State Senate. “So much of what happens on the streets of New […]

StreetsPAC Releases Second Round of Albany Endorsements

StreetsPAC released its second round of endorsements for the state legislature today (the first round is here), announcing its support for State Senate and Assembly candidates in Queens, Brooklyn, and Suffolk County. “We really value the chance to meet with candidates, hear their stories and discuss how we can work together to improve the streets […]

StreetsPAC Announces Second Round of City Council Endorsements

StreetsPAC announced its second round of City Council endorsements today. Endorsees include a council newcomer in the Bronx, and incumbents in Manhattan, Brooklyn, and Queens. StreetsPAC likes Assembly Member Vanessa Gibson to succeed termed-out Bronx rep Helen Foster in District 16. Gibson backed legislation to bring speed cameras to NYC, according to StreetsPAC, and supports […]