Skip to Content
Streetsblog New York City home
Streetsblog New York City home
Log In
Streetsblog

DC’s Car-Sharing Fee: A Case Study in Bad Parking Policy

Car-sharing is an all-around great deal for cities. According to research from UC Berkeley [PDF], each shared car removes 14 from the road. It cuts down on carbon emissions [PDF]. Car-sharing users even spend more at local businesses [PDF].

In a grand gesture in bad parking policy, DC is levying a steep parking fee on its car-sharing fleet. Photo: The City Fix

You would think cities would be bending over backward to welcome these communal vehicles. But Washington, D.C. has imposed a steep parking fee on the city’s car sharing fleet. At $200 to $400 per month, the cost will add about $1 to $2 to the price of using a car.

Clayton Lane at Network blog The City Fix explains why this policy is so flawed:

DDOT, rather than levy a 20 percent tax on carsharing members whose behavior benefits the neighborhood, should keep carsharing affordable and instead tax private car use – the main source of congestion and many environmental problems. DDOT could raise the same revenue with a painless $2 annual fee for all residential parking tags. Or it could simply charge $100 annually for each household’s second car. Or implement smart meters, which vary prices based on real-time demand, ensuring that around 15 percent of commercial on-street parking spaces remain available. In downtown Redwood City, Calif., smart meters generate $1 million of additional revenue each year for safer, cleaner sidewalks.

The worst part is that car owners will continue to park on-street virtually for free. Annual tags will still cost $15 per household, with the second car parking totally free. Why should carsharing members pay market rates for on-street parking, while car owners get a subsidy? It’s totally backward policy.

Donald Shoup, in his seminal book, “The High Cost of Free Parking,” estimates the market value of on-street spaces in central Los Angeles at $31,000 each – more valuable than the vehicles parked in them. Subsidizing car ownership with free parking distorts the market, encouraging more people to own and drive cars. As Shoup says, everyone pays for free parking – except the driver. Now in D.C., sadly, even carsharing members will.

Elsewhere on the Network today: Mobilizing the Region reports that Nassau County has a $26 million surplus, just enough to keep afloat the Long Island Bus service it claims it can’t afford. The Atlanta Bicycle Coalition brings word that locals have taken up “tactical urbanism” to demonstrate the need for more public space. And Grid Chicago says that new bike lanes just keep appearing in the Windy City.

Stay in touch

Sign up for our free newsletter

More from Streetsblog New York City

Gov. Hochul’s Uber-Backed Car Insurance ‘Reforms’ Threaten Payouts To Crash Victims

Hochul wants to limit payouts to crash victims under the guise of "affordability" and bogus claims about "staged crashes."

January 14, 2026

Cyclist Badly Injured By Truck Driver at Busy Midtown Corner

The victim may have lost her leg, one witness said.

West Siders: Better Bike Lanes, Not Bans, Will Make Central Park Safer

Central Park needs protected bike lanes at its perimeter and on its transverses to keep non-recreational users out.

January 14, 2026

Not So Fast: Advocates Aren’t Sold on Gov. Hochul’s AV Push

"There is no evidence that autonomous vehicles help us achieve our goals to make our state or city’s streets more people-centered," one group said.

January 14, 2026

Wednesday’s Headlines: Hochul Has Her Say Edition

The "State of the State" is Mamdani — but Hochul is still the governor. Plus more news.

January 14, 2026

Opinion: Stop Asking If People Want to Ride Bikes

"We shouldn’t be aiming to nudge a few percentage points in public opinion. Our goal should be to make freedom of mobility so compelling that people demand it."

January 14, 2026
See all posts