Skip to content

Car Companies Vie for Supremacy in Distracted Driving Arms Race

The GPS system with the tiny keyboard. The mounted DVD player for the kiddies. Satellite radio with 1,000 channels. Now there’s even in-dash, voice-activated Facebook.

The GPS system with the tiny keyboard. The mounted DVD player for the kiddies. Satellite radio with 1,000 channels. Now there’s even in-dash, voice-activated Facebook.

Industry observers describe a “race to arms” among auto companies to install driver distraction systems. Photo: Info NIAC

Welcome to the modern car, where a host of distracting gadgets comes standard. These digital additions are becoming as ubiquitous as cupholders, writes Paul Atchley at Car Talk:

In the distraction arms race, it is not entirely clear who is to blame: Detroit or Main Street … The sad truth is, distracting technologies also help to sell cars. If you’re a manufacturer, cars are all about profit — in fact, automobile companies have a fiduciary responsibility to make a profit. Until consumers demand otherwise, we need to get ready for a lot of new 21st century cup holders. For those of us who spend our days working to reduce deaths and injuries on our roads, that’s an ominous sign.

Keri at Commute Orlando says the trend is symptomatic of a larger problem:

Why does the consumer want these things? Because they’re bored out of their minds. That’s why. Driving sucks.

We’ve engineered our entire transportation system around an activity which requires increasing amounts of unproductive time, unless you are distracted. Driving is time spent between what you were doing and what you want or need to do next. It steals hours of our lives we’ll never get back. Too many people have all but forgotten it’s a task that actually requires attention. But that’s not hard to do. What with the highway engineers enabling mindless driving and the car companies supplying distractions.

What could possibly go wrong?

Elsewhere on the Network today: Gateway Streets looks at the city of St. Louis’ mind boggling decision to turn over a street to another municipality because its thriving commercial district has slowed auto traffic. M-Bike.org asks what effect Detroit’s staggering 25 percent population loss will have on roads and cycling. And Biking in LA sees the New York City bikelash as instructive for other cities taking steps to restore balance to their roadways.

Photo of Angie Schmitt
Angie is a Cleveland-based writer with a background in planning and newspaper reporting. She has been writing about cities for Streetsblog for six years.

Read More:

Comments Are Temporarily Disabled

Streetsblog is in the process of migrating our commenting system. During this transition, commenting is temporarily unavailable.

Once the migration is complete, you will be able to log back in and will have full access to your comment history. We appreciate your patience and look forward to having you back in the conversation soon.

More from Streetsblog New York City

Cycle of Rage: Wrong-Way Driver Reveals Wrong-Way Approach To Street Safety

April 7, 2026

Report: Safety Protections Have Not Kept Up With E-Commerce Boom, And Last Mile Is Making It Worse

April 7, 2026

Tuesday’s Headlines: Mamdani On Notice Edition

April 7, 2026

March (Parking) Madness Finals: Who Will Roll The Rock?

April 6, 2026

Monday’s Headlines: Citi Bike’s New Feature Edition

April 6, 2026
See all posts