So Much Parking It Hurts
Today on the Streetsblog Network, Austin Contrarian counts the ways that too much parking can damage a downtown:
10:15 AM EDT on August 10, 2009
Today on the Streetsblog Network, Austin Contrarian counts the ways that too much parking can damage a downtown:
Photo by Amber Rhea via Flickr.
- Parking raises the cost of new development, which means less of it. This may be no big deal for a city with a built-out downtown, but it is a big deal for Austin, which devotes so many downtown blocks to surface parking or stand-alone garages.
- Parking not only raises the cost of new development, but it limits size and density. An on-site garage can only be so big to be practical. A developer who wants to provide enough on-site parking to cover peak demand must first figure out how much parking he can build; only then will he know how much he can build of whatever it is he wants to build.
- Parking garages and surface lots blight the streetscape, triggering a negative feedback loop: the surface lots and garages make streets less attractive to pedestrians, which drives the pedestrians away, which reduces demand for pedestrian-oriented retail, which makes the streetscape even less attractive for pedestrians, etc.
- Subsidized parking — i.e., parking provided below cost — distorts the market, encouraging an inefficient mix of driving and transit use.
- Plopping ever more parking downtown increases congestion. The amount of land devoted to streets is fixed. The amount of parking is not. Increasing the number of parking spots but not the amount of street space means more cars per square meter of street, which in turn means more congestion. (This very interesting paper (pdf) by Michael Manville and Donald Shoup explores this argument in depth.)
- Parking garages and surface lots are butt-ugly.
Elsewhere around the network: St. Louis Urban Workshop notes an apparent disconnect in the thinking of Sen. Christopher Dodd, chair of the Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs. The Overhead Wire asks why the US can’t match India’s commitment to funding new metro systems. And Human Transit wonders whether we should ride mediocre transit systems just because they need the “vote” we cast when we hop aboard.
Sarah Goodyear is a journalist and author who has covered cities and transportation for publications such as Grist, CityLab, and Streetsblog.
Read More:
More from Streetsblog New York City
DOT’s Greenpoint Greenway Project Doesn’t Dream Big Enough
Greenpoint residents don't want the bike lanes from 2010.
April 1, 2026
Crash Victims, Lawmakers To Hochul: ‘We Have A Better Idea To Reform Car Insurance’
Lawmakers think that there are savings to be found in how insurers set car insurance rates, rather than litigation costs.
April 1, 2026
Wednesday’s Headlines: We 404’d The Times Edition
The Gray Lady dissed us, so we played a trick on her. Plus other news on this April Fool's Day.
April 1, 2026
PLAZA SWEET: Mamdani To Convert Streets Into Rome-Style ‘Piazzas,’ Starting in Paladino and Ariola’s Districts
"How could they object to bringing one of the best things about Italy to New York?" a city source told Streetsblog.
April 1, 2026
Council Members Form ‘DRIVE Caucus’ To Advocate for Cheaper and Easier Driving
Finally, car owners will have a counterweight to bike-lane and transit advocates.
April 1, 2026
Comments Are Temporarily Disabled
Streetsblog is in the process of migrating our commenting system. During this transition, commenting is temporarily unavailable.
Once the migration is complete, you will be able to log back in and will have full access to your comment history. We appreciate your patience and look forward to having you back in the conversation soon.