Pricing Advocates Hear Excuses from Queens State Senator

albany_rally.jpg
Michael O’Loughlin of the Campaign for New York’s Future leads the congestion pricing rally on the capitol steps.

Streetsblog’s Brad Aaron files this report from Albany.

A contingent of about 80 New Yorkers is in Albany today to advocate for congestion pricing. Following a brief rally on the capitol steps this morning, led by the Campaign for New York’s Future, the crowd broke off into small groups for a day of sit-downs with individual lawmakers.

I shadowed a group assigned to Senator Frank Padavan of Queens, who is against pricing, though he represents a district where just six percent of the population commutes by car to Manhattan’s central business district. An amiably cantankerous fellow, Padavan started the meeting with a question: "Did the mayor send you up here?" The senator then went on for a bit about Bloomberg’s helicopter and private jet before getting down to business.

"We’ve gotten tons of info," Padavan said. "We have reviewed it all, and I don’t really have any questions."

Padavan said Residential Parking Permits would help his car-owning constituents avoid park-and-ride problems, and allowed that new express buses would be a welcome addition to his district. But he also said that, according to the MTA, there is no way to add subway capacity from 179th Street in Jamaica.

Then, when the senator was presented with specific plans for transit improvements in Queens, things got off track.

"When are we going to do something about the taxicabs and the limousines?" Padavan asked, apropos of nothing. "There’s nothing in the plan that addresses that."

Padavan proceeded to rail against limos double-parking as they wait for affluent Manhattanites. (He was unaware of the proposed $1 surcharge for yellow cab rides.) He then suggested a fleet of jitneys along the avenues, which would be financially self-sustaining. ("What does he think buses are?" wondered one advocate after the meeting.)

Padavan pointed out how many City Council members from Queens and Brooklyn are against pricing, concluding, "You ought to be down there talking to them."

A cyclist in the group spoke eloquently of the vision needed from Albany to move the plan through, to make New York a city of livable streets. "We’d love you to provide leadership," one advocate said.

Padavan responded that City Council members don’t listen to him. In fact, he said, one of them is running against him.

  • Larry Littlefield

    (Padovan responded that City Council members don’t listen to him. In fact, he said, one of them is running against him.)

    Why vote against this guy in the “livable streets” issue when you can vote against him as retailiation for having NYC’s state education funding cut, in contrast with increases for the rest of the state, in the last two recessions?

  • Curious

    So why was the Senator against pricing?

  • Ed

    Ditto to Curious’s question.

  • Brad Aaron

    I’m not sure myself, Curious and Ed.

    Padavan was identified by the Campaign as “anti,” but has not been outspoken about it one way or the other from what I can tell. He spent most of the meeting talking about jitneys, taxis, limos, helicopters, etc., and while never declaring his position, there was a definite lack of enthusiasm.

    Interestingly, his web site has a pricing poll on it. Maybe he’s looking for something to point to as a rationale for getting behind CP, or not.

  • Benjamin

    (Interestingly, his web site has a pricing poll on it. Maybe he’s looking for something to point to as a rationale for getting behind CP, or not.)

    Right now, that poll stands at 5 votes for congestion pricing, 31 votes against. Maybe it needs some visitors from Streetsblog? http://www.frankpadavan.com

  • Josh

    Nothing like a little online ballot stuffing. Let’s get on it. 🙂

  • Josh

    By the way, I also don’t see any reason why Padavan is/should be against CP. For him, like for so many, it seems to be a knee-jerk “us vs. them” sentiment, completely neglecting the fact that most of “us” don’t own cars and therefore would be happy to let “them” have more space for theirs as long as they help pay for transit facilities that most of “us” use.

  • Heffron

    For anyone that’s curious, someone at Padavan’s website reset the poll as soon as it started leaning towards favoring congestion pricing. Don’t put a poll on the internet if you don’t want it to be open to the world Senator Padavan. His website is http://www.frankpadavan.com

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

Dueling Videos: Weprin and McCaffrey vs. New York’s Future

|
Azi Paybarah at the Politicker shot this video of Queens City Council Member David Weprin’s anti-pricing rally yesterday. Sharing the podium with Weprin is Walter McCaffrey of Keep NYC Congestion Tax Free. Can you count the distortions relayed in this nine minute reel? After the jump, Azi gets a response from Michael O’Loughlin of the […]

Pricing Round Up: Persuasive Arguments, Rigged Polls, New Buses

|
With a congestion pricing bill now on the table and the days to get it passed quickly winding down, here is a snapshot of where a handful of electeds, including heavy-hitters like David Paterson and Sheldon Silver, stand. First, the Times quotes Governor Paterson, following his sit-down with Mayor Bloomberg yesterday afternoon: "The mayor, I […]

Campaign For New York’s Future: Event to Thanks Legislators for Action on Congestion Pricing and to Urge Action on Remaining Issues

|
Leading representatives from the New York Central Labor Council, the Tri-State Transportation Campaign, Environmental Defense, Nos Quedamos and Transportation Alternatives will join with other leaders from the Campaign for New York’s Future to thank New York’s elected leaders for moving New York’s congestion pricing plan forward while also urging quick action on key remaining steps […]

More Mixed Signals on Pricing’s Chances Under Paterson

|
  "Today is Monday. There is work to be done." So said David Paterson, who was sworn in as New York’s 55th governor just after 1:00 this afternoon. Two Mondays from now, the City Council and state Legislature will need to have adopted a congestion pricing plan if the city is to receive $354 million […]

Resolved: More Traffic Congestion & Automobile Dependence

|
Brooklyn City Councilmember Lew Fidler and a small group of his outer borough colleagues have put forward Resolution 774 "calling upon the Mayor of New York City to oppose the institution of any form of congestion pricing." The resolution is based on a March 2006 report commissioned by the Queens Chamber of Commerce that was, […]