Skip to Content
Streetsblog New York City home
Streetsblog New York City home
Log In
Albany Reform

Brodsky Attacks Critics of His Congestion Pricing Study

brodsky.jpgOn the Brian Lehrer show this morning, Assembly Member Richard Brodsky brushed off reports of his parking industry campaign contributions and TA, RPA and Streetsblog's substantive criticism of his congestion pricing study as a "personal attack."

Here's a transcript

Brian Lehrer: Streetsblog, the website, reported yesterday that over the past five years you have accepted at least $16,000 in campaign contributions from parking garage interests which far exceeds those of any other state legislator. They are implying here that parking lot interests, being based mainly in midtown are opposed to congestion pricing because it would mean less cars and less business and you may be carrying some water for them.

Richard Brodsky: First of all, lets just assume, Brian, that I am the worst person in the world. I assume the reason they are attacking me rather than the report we issued is because the report stands as a fair, thorough, true and accurate analysis of the plan. The attack on me is silly. I raised over 2 million dollars while I was running for Attorney General...um..We raised it from a lot of progressives and a lot of left-wingers. The attempt to demonize and attack your opponents on a personal basis is something I reject when it’s Karl Rove and I reject it when it’s Transportation Alternatives or these blogs.

Brian Lehrer: Than why does parking lot industry give you more money than any other legislator?

Richard Brodsky: Part of the reason is because I have a long-standing relationship with one... uh...family..uh...friends of mine, who have been supporters of mine for years. Brian, I put in bills against congestion pricing in 1995. That's on the public record. If...if...if what we're about...assume I'm a crook, if you like. Lets then discuss whether the report that I put out has merit or it doesn't. And if it doesn't than I ought to fix it and I ought to re think my position. And if it does, even the people calling me names ought to deal with that. I mean...this is...this is silliness. The...the...the decision to change the discussion to whether I am an honest person from whether the mayor's program is good for the people of the city is not in anyone's interest. The Mayor gives out millions of dollars to the organizations that are supporting his plan. He...he gives his personal money. Tens of millions of dollars. I don't believe those people are supporting his plan because they are dishonest. And I'll tell you right now, and real clearly -- that the decision to raise this now is a sign of intellectual and political bankruptcy.

You can listen to the entire segment here:

Stay in touch

Sign up for our free newsletter

More from Streetsblog New York City

Safety First on Third: DOT Numbers Show a Roadway Safer for All Users

Say it again: Bike lanes make roadways safer for all users.

February 19, 2025

Wednesday’s Headlines: Mayor in a Whirlwind Edition

Mayor Adams will learn more about his fate today. Plus other news.

February 19, 2025

Another View: It’s Time for Residential Parking Permits

So people in the livable streets movement think residential parking permits might actually work. Read on...

February 19, 2025

Analysis: Residential Parking Permits Would Be Bad for City Streets

Congestion pricing isn't driving more people to park Uptown — and even if it did, "hunting licenses" for parking spots wouldn't help.

February 18, 2025

Too Much Illegal Parking Prompts Community Board to Reject New Housing

Even after the city greatly reduced parking mandates in the City of Yes initiative, parking is still at the center of many debates about new housing.

February 18, 2025
See all posts