DOT Breaks Down Street Safety Spending for City Council

At a City Council budget hearing today, Transportation Commissioner Polly Trottenberg outlined in detail how DOT plans to allocate funds for street safety over the next year.

DOT will spend $23 million to acquire the 120 additional speed cameras that were authorized by the state legislature this session, Trottenberg said, and will begin the procurement process when Governor Cuomo signs the bill into law. In her opening statement Trottenberg thanked the council for passing a home rule message in support of legislation to lower the default city speed limit to 25 miles per hour, which she said would be “invaluable” to DOT’s street safety program.

On the subject of speed cameras, Trottenberg said placements will be data-driven. “We’re looking at creative ways to enhance the value of cameras,” she said, possibly including dummy signs that indicate an area “may be monitored.”

For FY 15, Trottenberg said, DOT has allocated $13 million to redesign streets and intersections; $2 million for speed humps, including those in Slow Zones; $3 million for Vision Zero educational materials; $8 million for wayfinding signs and the City Bench program; and $19 million for public plazas. To put these numbers in perspective, DOT’s total “controllable expenses” are budgeted at $493 million in FY 2015 [PDF, page 46]. The speed cameras, speed humps, and Vision Zero educational materials seem to account for the $28.8 million in DOT Vision Zero funds earmarked in Mayor de Blasio’s executive budget.

The city will build the West Street and Flushing Avenue segments of the Brooklyn Greenway next year, Trottenberg said, and will complete a streetscape project on 185th Street in Washington Heights.

Other news from the hearing:

  • Trottenberg said the city is negotiating with Alta as the company attempts to improve bike-share operations and attract investors. “I’m hopeful that we’re going to have some good news to announce,” she said. As they have at prior hearings, several council members, including Steve Levin, Brad Lander, and Jimmy Van Bramer, said that they would like to see city funds devoted to bike-share.
  • Responding to a question from Council Member Julissa Ferreras, Trottenberg said DOT will try to work with existing non-profits to help maintain public plazas in areas where there are no business improvement districts.

  • Council Member Robert Cornegy, who represents Bedford Stuyvesant and part of Crown Heights, told Trottenberg that wider sidewalks and removal of parking for Select Bus Service has hurt small businesses, and asked that DOT “revisit” those changes. Small businesses “want to be a part of a city that’s growing,” Cornegy said, “but there’s been a negative impact in my district and around the city.” Cornegy said SBS and wider sidewalks shouldn’t reduce commercial foot traffic. Cornegy should look at the data: Local businesses saw a 73 percent increase in retail sales following the installation of Select Bus Service on Fordham Road in the Bronx.
  • Council Member Antonio Reynoso said he would like to see Williamsburg be “ground zero for Vision Zero,” in order to reduce pedestrian and cyclist injuries and deaths. “We really want to be treated as a guinea pig for Vision Zero,” Reynoso said. Trottenberg replied that DOT is “keenly and sadly aware” of Williamsburg fatalities, and said the agency is open to trying out new safety measures there.
  • Queens rep Elizabeth Crowley said she has not heard from DOT about improvements to Grand Avenue, where a curb-jumping driver ran over five children on the sidewalk outside a school last year. Trottenberg said DOT is working on improving “project delivery,” which depends on funding sources.
  • Trottenberg told council members that a speed hump costs $12,000, and the price tag for each Slow Zone is $150,000 to $200,000. DOT installs eight Slow Zones annually, and the schedule is full through the next fiscal year.
  • After participating in a Vision Zero rally outside City Hall this morning, Upper West Side Council Member Helen Rosenthal questioned placing bike lanes on streets where businesses are located. She asked Trottenberg if DOT keeps track of how many bike lanes are on residential versus commercial streets. “Just as Council Member Cornegy was talking about bike lanes along the commercial streets [Cornegy’s concern was bus lanes], it’s a challenge in my district too,” said Rosenthal. “And you know, this is just, for me, one of those situations where it always comes back to bite you. I pushed very hard for a bike lane on Columbus Avenue, which is a main commercial thoroughfare, and now I’m somewhat regretting that we didn’t do it on West End Avenue. So it’s something I’d be interested in sort of watching for the next few years, and I wanted to put that on your radar.”

Officials from the MTA and TLC also testified before the council. We’ll have more on the hearing tomorrow.

  • Seth Rosenblum

    What the heck is Robert Cornegy talking about? If anything the sidewalks’ being too narrow would harm local businesses due to the ongoing reconstruction of Nostrand avenue.

  • ohnonononono

    Re: Rosenthal’s Q. Why would this be such a concern? Residential streets are going to more often be streets that have less destinations, so commercial streets are going to be a better fit most of the time… also commercial streets would typically be better candidates ’cause they’d tend to have more auto traffic. West End might not really need a bike lane if it doesn’t get as heavy traffic as the commercial avenues. I’m confused where she’s going with that.

  • lop

    Bike lanes push trucks off the curb and obviously the curb belongs to business and is needed for them to unload their trucks.

    I think that’s the gist of it.

  • BBnet3000

    “DOT will spend $23 million to acquire the 120 additional speed cameras that were authorized by the state legislature this session, Trottenberg said, and will begin the procurement process when Governor Cuomo signs the bill into law. ”

    These cameras cost $191,000 a piece? Damn

  • Joe R.

    I was wondering about that too. Granted, these are in heavy metal housings and need to be installed, but $191K each? I would think $10K each tops. Somebody is getting rich off this. You can build a house for $191K.

  • BBnet3000

    Even when I wrote that comment I was thinking “oh this is specialized equipment, etc” but now that I think about it, I doubt it. All the processing, reading license plate numbers etc, is done in a central computer, not at the camera.

  • BBnet3000

    Its quite possible to have a protected bike lane with a delivery or dropoff zone on the outside of it. The guys with handtrucks or pallet jacks just need to cross the bike lane to get to the sidewalk.

  • qp

    Other than blind speculation do you have any reason to think it’s an excessive amount to spend per camera? I’m having trouble finding comparable numbers elsewhere, all I’ve found is Baltimore, which while they spent much less per camera, they shared revenue with their vendor, which led to problems. Does NYC share revenue from these cameras?

    ‘The original bid sheets, which The Brew requested and reviewed, show that Brekford charges $55,000 per speed camera, compared to $46,500 by Xerox and $60,000 by Redflex.’

    ‘For every $75 traffic ticket generated by the cameras and collected by the city, Brekford is rebated $21. For every $40 ticket, Brekford gets $11.20.’

    ‘The Baltimore Sun found that a recently installed camera on The Alameda has wrongly issued tickets, citing motorists for exceeding a 25 mph limit when the posted limit is 30 mph.’,0,5582900.story

    ‘City plans to pay Brekford $600,000 to end speed camera contract’

  • Aunt Bike

    I’m told that the red light cams NYC uses cost $120,000. As long as the speeders pay for them, I think it’s worth every penny.

    “Trottenberg told council members that a speed hump costs $12,000, and
    the price tag for each Slow Zone is $150,000 to $200,000. DOT installs
    eight Slow Zones annually, and the schedule is full through the next
    fiscal year”.

    Slowing down knucklehead lawbreakers costs money. Camera enforcement done right can send the bill to the people who make it necessary. Win win, says this observer.

  • Aunt Bike

    I’m told NYC owns it’s equipment and operates the system. That is a distinction between our program and many other cities, and I think the reason why other cities have problems that we don’t.

    Private companies have no incentive to run a tight ship, it would just cut their profit. NYC doesn’t need to rig the system-a mere handful of speed cameras that don’t even operate during peak speeding hours, in just a few locations, results in a tremendous number of tickets issued.


De Blasio DOT Budget Fails to Meet de Blasio Vision Zero Timetable [Updated]

#VisionZero FY17 funding includes $115M for street capital construction projects, $59M for #SafeRoutestoSchools, — NYC DOT (@NYC_DOT) March 2, 2016 Update below Mayor de Blasio’s proposed DOT budget again falls well short of what’s needed to implement life-saving street redesigns within the time frame prescribed by Vision Zero. The mayor’s preliminary FY 2017 budget allocates $115 million […]

NYPD Conspicuously Absent From City Council Vision Zero Hearing

How seriously does Police Commissioner Bill Bratton take Vision Zero? The City Council transportation committee held a hearing today to gauge the city’s progress in reducing traffic injuries and deaths, and NYPD didn’t send a single person to provide testimony or answer questions. In NYPD’s absence, Transportation Commissioner Polly Trottenberg — as she often does — had to field council […]