All Eyes on Senate as Families for Safe Streets Push for Lower Speed Limit

From left, Greg Thompson, Joy Clarke, DOT's Juan Martinez, Transportation Commissioner Polly Trottenberg, Aaron Charlop-Powers, Mary Beth Kelly, and Ellen Foote in Albany yesterday on a Families for Safe Streets visit to legislators. Photo: Families for Safe Streets/Twitter
From left, Greg Thompson, Joy Clarke, DOT’s Juan Martinez, Transportation Commissioner Polly Trottenberg, Aaron Charlop-Powers, Mary Beth Kelly, and Ellen Foote in Albany yesterday on a Families for Safe Streets visit to legislators. Photo: Families for Safe Streets/Twitter

Yesterday, five members of Families for Safe Streets were joined by Transportation Commissioner Polly Trottenberg in Albany to build support for a bill to lower the city’s default speed limit to 25 mph. Advocates say Assembly Speaker Sheldon Silver is set to sign on as a sponsor, while City Hall and advocates continue to aim for support in the State Senate, potentially from Senate Co-Leader Jeff Klein.

A source tells Streetsblog that Trottenberg met with Klein this morning, asking him to add his name to the legislation. As leader of the Independent Democratic Conference, which shares power with Senate Republicans, Klein could put the bill over the top in the chamber. DOT and Klein’s office have not responded to questions about the meeting.

klein
The fate of legislation to reduce the default speed limit in NYC to 25 mph and make it easier to designate 20 mph streets may rest with State Senator Jeff Klein.

“I think he’s receptive to the change. He was a big, big supporter of speed cameras,” said Aaron Charlop-Powers, whose mother was was killed while riding her bike to work in the Bronx in 2010. “I’m hopeful that he’ll also emerge as a sponsor in this session.”

The bill seems to have a clear path to passage in the Assembly. Caroline Samponaro of Transportation Alternatives said Silver supports the 25 mph bill“We really heard there was commitment from him to move the bill forward with the speaker as the lead co-sponsor,” she said.

While Silver’s office has yet to return a request for comment, other members of the Assembly leadership are on the record signaling they will support the 25 mph bill. Ways and Means Committee Chair Herman “Denny” Farrell told Streetsblog yesterday that while he needed more information and assurances that it would not lead to unfair speed traps on major streets, he’s receptive to the bill. “That one I’ve got to hear more about,” he said. “I will probably vote for the 25 mph [bill].”

The bill already has the support of 38 Assembly members, including Codes Committee Chair Joe Lentol, Bronx Democratic Party leader Carl Heastie, and Harlem representative Keith Wright, who until recently was chair of the state Democratic Party.

On the Senate side, no Republicans and no IDC members are currently listed as sponsors of the bill, although Nassau Republican Carl Marcellino reportedly signed on after meeting with advocates earlier this month.

There are two New York City IDC members in addition to Klein, Diane Savino and Tony Avella. Faith Marie Famularo, legislative director for Savino, says her boss is “very aware of Vision Zero” but “still contemplating” the 25 mph bill. Avella vehemently opposed a previous version of the bill, which would have lowered speed limits to 20 mph. He has not responded to multiple requests from Streetsblog about his position on the amended legislation.

After yesterday’s meetings with advocates, the bill may have more momentum in the Senate. Samponaro, who was in Albany yesterday, said that Savino backed the bill after meeting with Trottenberg, and Avella seemed interested but wanted to ensure there was more local input before the city set speed limits.

Lizi Rahman’s 22-year-old son Asif was killed by a driver on the Queens Boulevard service road while riding his bike in 2008. At the time, Avella was a City Council member. “He was very supportive,” Rahman said. “He even wrote a letter for me to the DOT commissioner and we got a response.”

On a Families for Safe Streets trip to Albany earlier this month to rally for a 20 mph speed limit, she met with Avella. “He wasn’t in favor of lowering the speed limit, and I was kind of shocked. I thought he would be supportive, but he wasn’t,” she said, adding that she hopes Avella would be more receptive to the new bill.

Another vote to keep an eye on is State Senator Marty Golden, a Brooklyn Republican who was a thorn in the side of the Silver-Klein speed camera bill that ultimately passed both chambers last month. Golden’s office has not responded to multiple requests for comment from Streetsblog, but Stefania Vasquenz, co-founder of street safety group Bay Ridge Advocates for Keeping Everyone Safe, said Golden aide John Quaglione contacted her group yesterday to set up a meeting about the 25 mph bill.

“I remain optimistic about Marty Golden, but I’m never sure,” Vasquenz said. “Something needs to happen drastically because these pedestrian deaths are becoming epidemic.”

The clock is ticking: The legislative session ends on June 19.

  • chrisC

    “assurances that it would not lead to unfair speed traps on major streets”

    How can a speed trap be “unfair”? If you’re speeding, you’re speeding, and should get a fine and demerit points.

  • WoodyinNYC

    Could be unfair if they were set up in Harlem but not, say, on the Upper West Side near Lincoln Center.

    I saw one “routine traffic stop” in operation one night on 125th St. Every car was pulled over for a chat and to show the police the proper documents. Seeing the blatant harassment gave me the creeps.

    But maybe I don’t get out enough. Maybe the avenues are blocked and all drivers are pulled over down in SoHo and Tribeca, or across the Park on the Upper East Side. That would seem only fair.

  • Shemp

    Unfair bike traps are those at the top of t-intersections where cyclists don’t interact with either cars or peds and seem to get most of PDs cyclist enforcement.

  • millerstephen

    Assembly Member Farrell’s concerns were focused on “speed traps” where, in the example he used, the speed limit on a road drops at the bottom of a hill, giving officers an opportunity to pull over drivers who might not have expected the speed limit to change. All this bill does is lower the citywide limit to 25 mph and gives DOT the ability to sign some streets (like residential zones, for example) for 20 mph: http://www.streetsblog.org/2014/05/14/speed-limit-bills-shift-to-25-mph-allow-dot-to-designate-20-mph-streets/

  • JimthePE

    If it only applies to surface streets in NYC, that’s one thing. If it allowed a 25 mph limit on, say, the BQE, that would be unfair. If it applies to all cities and villages, then some village in the north country could set a 25 mph speed limit on a two-lane country road, That would also be an unfair speed trap.

  • Mark

    Ironically, parts of the Gowanus/BQE actually are posted at 25 and 30 right now for the ongoing 20 year construction project. And it’s absurd.

    But this is exactly how it can be unfair. Speed limits need to be reasonable, like all laws. The greatest danger of car-on-car collisions comes from disparity in speed between vehicles, the actual speed is less meaningful. If you cause streets where people routinely feel safe going 40 to be posted at 20, you will have traffic moving at radically different speeds. That causes increased crashes, and crashing cars don’t always stay off sidewalks and crosswalks.

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG