Tonight: Tell Manhattan CBs That Harlem Needs a Safer Morningside Avenue

The plan for a safer Morningside Avenue is similar to treatments already in place in Harlem and the Bronx. Image: DOT

Community Boards 9 and 10 in Harlem will again hear from DOT tonight on a plan to calm traffic on Morningside Avenue [PDF]. The proposal was developed in response to a request from the North Star Neighborhood Association, and though there is general agreement that speeding drivers are a major problem on Morningside, the community boards have so far failed to endorse the city’s plan to make the street safer.

City Council Democratic primary winner Mark Levine wants the boards to move forward with the proposal, but as usual Council Member Inez Dickens, whose neighboring district encompasses most of the project area, has not indicated her support.

The plan would revamp Morningside from 116th Street to 126th Street from two lanes in each direction to a narrower single lane in each direction, with a center striped median, concrete pedestrian islands and left turn lanes. Parking lanes on each side would be widened, allowing space for cyclists and double-parked drivers. At entrances to Morningside Park, on the west side of the avenue, DOT has proposed painted curb extensions in the parking lane. The proposal does not include bike lanes.

The plan resembles existing traffic-calming measures on Macombs Road in the Bronx and on St. Nicholas Avenue in Harlem, and has some similarities to the plan for Adam Clayton Powell Jr. Boulevard.

DOT presented the proposal in September to the transportation committees of both boards. The CB 10 committee, which has a history of inaction and opposition when it comes to livable streets projects, asked DOT for more data. CB 9 voted 18-15 to table the project, according to The Uptowner. Board members said the proposal needed more vetting, despite committee meetings and positive comments from the public.

Which brings us to tonight’s forum, where DOT will again present its plan and answer questions.

“I don’t think there’s much objection to the substance of the proposal,” says Levine. “The more I talk to people, the more they think it’s a good idea.”

Levine expects a CB 9 vote from the full board soon. “It would really send a powerful message to DOT if we got affirmative votes on both boards,” he said.

Dickens staffer Lermond Mayes has said the council member is supportive of traffic-calming on Morningside, but she has not signaled approval of the DOT plan. “We haven’t exactly seen how effective it will be,” Mayes told Streetsblog last month. Mayes said other traffic-calming measures in Harlem have caused congestion. “You also end up creating obstructions to traffic flow,” he said. “To hear from her boards is very helpful.”

Levine is optimistic, but said he wants action before Mayor Bloomberg leaves office. “It’s possible the plan could be shelved, or we could go back to square one,” he said, “and I don’t think anybody wants that.”

A strong turnout tonight would show community board members that the public wants a safer Morningside Avenue. The forum is scheduled for 6:30 p.m. at The Fortune Society, 630 Riverside Drive.

  • Ben Kintisch

    Please, Manhattan Streetsblog readers, show up for this one! The motorists who complain about these kinds of improvements are well represented on these boards. We need walkers, cyclists and open-minded car drivers to show up and support the plan for improved safety.

  • Daphna

    Please come to this forum to speak up for traffic calming!!!!

    Lermond Mayes, Innez Dickens staffer, is wrong when he says other traffic calming in Harlem have caused congestion. That is a false claim and a false narrative. The traffic calming on Adam Clayton Powell and around Marcus Garvey Park are very effective and are not creating congestion.

    The chair of CB10 Transportation Committee and the chair of CB10 full Board are against traffic calming. The chair of CB9 Transportation Committee is against traffic calming (but her committee never has a quorum anyway and thus could never pass a resolution either way) but the chair of the full Board of CB9 is in favor, so this has a chance of passing at that level.

    Going forward it would be helpful if there is a change of the membership of CB9 and CB10 to include some people who understand liveable streets. Gail Brewer could appoint new people to CB9 and CB10 and not just re-appoint the same people appointed by Stringer when their 2 year terms are up for renewal. Mark Levine likewise can appoint new people to CB9 and not just re-appoint Robert Jackson’s appointees. But in the meantime the public needs to convince CB9 members to go for this plan.

  • CompleteStreetist

    14-foot parking lanes? Just lay down some curbside protected bike lanes already, with ample loading zones to accommodate drivers who would otherwise double-park.

  • Nick

    There isn’t quite enough room for protected bike lanes without removing one of the lanes of parking. These 14 foot parking lanes are brilliant though – they are a way of sneaking in the equivalent of a 6 ft bike lane without pissing off the anti-bike crowd.

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

Tonight: CB 10 Committee Set to Vote on Morningside Ave Improvements

|
Manhattan Community Board 10 has scheduled a committee vote for this evening on proposed pedestrian improvements to Morningside Avenue in Harlem. The item appeared on a parks and transportation committee agenda sent out this afternoon. The meeting is set for 6:30 p.m. DOT has proposed restriping Morningside between 116th Street and 126th Street from two lanes […]

CB 9 Stands by Morningside Road Diet, But DOT Does Not

|
A plan to improve pedestrian safety on speeding-plagued Morningside Avenue in Harlem, supported by one community board but stalled by another, is on track for months of additional meetings as DOT goes back to the drawing board. The current plan, which would remove excess car lanes to create space for turn lanes and pedestrian islands, received a […]