Feds Propose to Expand Opportunities for Biking and Walking to Transit

When it comes to infrastructure improvements that encourage more people to walk or bicycle to transit stations, how long will commuters be willing to travel? The Federal Transit Administration (FTA) has officially answered that question, proposing a significant expansion of the rules governing how close bike-ped projects should be to transit in order to receive government funding.

6a00e551eea4f588340120a5b6138d970b_800wi.jpgThe BikeStation in Washington D.C., which provides parking and services for bicyclists who use transit. (Photo: U.S. DOT)

The FTA’s new rules, released for public comment on Friday, replace the previous definition of the so-called "structural envelope" surrounding a transit station.

In the past, regulators had tended to use 1,500 feet as the distance which "most
people can be expected to safely and conveniently walk to use the
transit service." But the Obama administration, stating plainly that the current radius is "too short," has proposed expanding it to a half-mile for pedestrian improvements and three miles for bicycle projects.

In its explanation of the new proposal, the FTA wrote:

The most successful and useful public
transportation systems have safe and convenient pedestrian access and
provide comfortable waiting areas, all of which encourage greater
use.

Distances beyond the walkshed of public transportation stops and
stations may in fact be within the range of a short bicycle trip.
Providing secure parking and other amenities for bicycles and cyclists
at public transportation stops or stations can be less expensive than
providing parking for automobiles.

The proposed regulation also codifies a U.S. DOT definition of "livability" that Streetsblog Capitol Hill took note of when it was first mentioned by Transportation Secretary LaHood: "If people don’t want an automobile, they don’t have to have one."

Public comments on the FTA’s proposal can be filed here.

  • Transit Now

    Just to try and make some sense out this proposal:

    1 mile = 5280 feet = ~10 short blocks.

    1/2 mile = 2640 feet = ~5 short blocks.

    3 miles = 15840 feet = ~30 short blocks.

    1500 feet = 0.284 miles = ~3 short blocks.

    A guesstimate, anyone have better numbers?

  • Wikipedia says a mile is 20 short blocks, so double all your estimates.

  • Transit Now

    to Cap’n Transit:

    Thanks, there’s no exact formula but your numbers make more sense, so:

    1 mile = 5280 feet = ~20 short blocks.

    1/2 mile = 2640 feet = ~10 short blocks.

    3 miles = 15840 feet = ~60 short blocks.

    1500 feet = 0.284 miles = ~5 or 6 short blocks.

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

STREETSBLOG USA

The “Choice” vs. “Captive” Transit Rider Dichotomy Is All Wrong

|
The conventional wisdom about transit often divides riders into two neat categories: “choice” riders — higher-income people with cars — and “captive” riders — lower-income people who must use transit because they don’t own cars. But this framework can undermine good transit, according to a new report from TransitCenter [PDF]. In the attempt to cater only to “choice” riders or “captive” […]
STREETSBLOG USA

A Misguided Fix for Traffic Congestion in Silicon Valley

|
According to a recent study of transit riders in Denver covered by CityLab, people who work within a 15-minute walk of a rail station are more likely to commute by train than people who live close to transit but don’t work by a station. Network blog Peninsula Transportation Alternatives says the study underscores how a proposal aimed at reining in traffic in Palo […]

Department of City Planning Continues to Restrict Development Near Transit

|
The Department of City Planning’s commitment to rezoning the city along more transit-oriented lines is a critical component of its sustainability agenda. Allowing more people to live and work next to transit means more people will ride transit and fewer will drive. Under Mayor Michael Bloomberg and City Planning Commissioner Amanda Burden, upzonings have indeed […]