Behold the Transport for London Traffic Collision Map

TFLmap
TfL’s crash map distinguishes between “serious” and “slight” collisions. Image: Transport for London

As City Hall staffers work on improvements to Vision Zero View, hopefully they’re taking cues from Transport for London’s collision map.

Launched last September, the TfL map “shows traffic collisions that resulted in personal injury and were reported to the police” from 2005 through 2015.

Some features of the TfL map that Vision Zero View doesn’t currently have:

  • Crashes are searchable by the severity of injury (“serious” or “slight”), whereas Vision Zero View lumps all non-fatal injury crashes together — this is important because the rate of serious injuries is considered a better measurement of street safety than the rate of fatalities or total injuries;
  • You can see fatal and injury crashes simultaneously, and icons for individual crashes vary based on injury severity, while on Vision Zero View fatalities and non-fatal injuries can only be viewed separately;
  • Summaries of individual crashes include vehicle types involved, the time of day each crashed occurred, and information on resulting injuries.

Streetsblog reader Robert Wright pointed me to the location where he was struck by a driver in 2009. The map described the crash like so:

On 04 February 2009 at 09:40:00 a collision occurred at Brixton Road junction with Groveway in Lambeth involving a light goods vehicle and a pedal cycle. An adult pedal cyclist was slightly injured.

One significant advantage of Vision Zero View, meanwhile, is that data is updated each month, while London only posts annual datasets. The current NYC map also includes info on street safety measures and speed limits, and categorizes injuries per square mile broken down by police precinct, city council district, and community district.

vzview
Vision Zero View’s traffic injury map shows specific crash locations…
tfl_zoomout
…while the TfL map clusters crashes together unless you zoom in to the tightest level.

Another superior aspect of Vision Zero View is that you can see specific crash locations even if you’re not zoomed in very far — you have to zoom out a few levels to trigger the “heatmap” mode — while on the London map, you have to go in tight to see individual crashes. It’s easier to get a sense of dangerous locations looking at the NYC map.

Still, there are very useful details in the data made public by TfL that NYC should emulate.

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

Van Bramer Wants Better Crash Data on the City’s Vision Zero View Map

|
City Council Majority Leader Jimmy Van Bramer has introduced a bill to expand the city’s online publication of crash data. When City Hall launched Vision Zero View in November 2014, it was a major upgrade. For the first time, New Yorkers could see up-to-date information on where crashes happen, with data refreshed every month. But there’s a lot still […]

Crash Data Show NYC Is Losing Ground on Vision Zero

|
After a four-month hiatus, City Hall is again updating its Vision Zero View map with new crash data, and through the first six months of 2016, traffic deaths rose slightly compared the same period last year. Through the end of June, 111 people lost their lives to traffic violence, up from 107 in the first half of 2015. Drivers […]

New Map Presents NYPD Crash Data as It Was Meant to Be Seen

|
There is a new mapping tool that presents NYPD crash data in a way that will be useful to advocates, electeds, and citizens who want to improve safety on neighborhood streets. A bit of background. For years, NYPD guarded traffic crash data like a state secret. After the City Council forced the department to make […]