Vacca Looks to Squeeze $ From Bikes, But Won’t Touch the Price of Parking

The headline from today’s City Council transportation committee oversight hearing was Janette Sadik-Khan’s announcement that the official launch date for Citi Bike is Memorial Day. Meanwhile, for Transportation Committee Chair James Vacca, it was another occasion to flail at bikes and defend cheap parking under the guise of holding a budget hearing.

Council Members Vacca and Recchia want to make sure that cyclists are a revenue source for the city — and that the parking status quo is maintained. Photos: NYC Council

Sadik-Khan kicked off the hearing with prepared testimony on the agency’s $732.9 million 2014 executive budget, including everything from public plazas and Select Bus Service upgrades to bridge repair and street lights.

But the bulk of council members’ questions revolved around bikes. The first came from an incredulous Vacca, who challenged Sadik-Khan’s statement that more than 70 percent of New Yorkers support bike-share. “How do you know that?” he asked, before she pointed him to polling from Quinnipiac University.

After asking about the $9.4 million budgeted for bicycle network expansion — 80 percent of which is covered by federal funds — and questioning whether a safety plan for the Grand Concourse should include bike lanes (Sadik-Khan noted that the street already has them), Vacca came to the heart of his questioning: How can the city get more revenue from bike riders?

“I didn’t see any projections in your budget based on revenue from the commercial cycling program,” Vacca said, referencing a package of laws the City Council passed last year that create new mandates for delivery cyclists and their employers. But it’s not just food delivery cyclists that Vacca sees as a revenue source. “When will we see revenue into the city’s coffers from bike-share?” he asked.

“[The Office of Management and Budget] does not include funding for new programs,” Sadik-Khan said. “They need to have a year to understand what the budget impact is going to be.” She added that any bike-share profits will be split evenly between the city and system operator Alta.

Finance committee chair Domenic Recchia, meanwhile, said he’s concerned about reduced parking revenue as a result of Citi Bike stations being installed on the street. “Less than one percent of parking spots were removed,” Sadik-Khan said, adding that not all on-street bike-share stations are in formerly metered spaces. “The contract provides that the operator has to make up the lost revenue to the city.”

Despite learning that the city is reimbursed by Alta, Recchia pressed again. “I need to have that number, because that number should really be recognized in the budget,” he said. Recchia’s focus on the trees instead of the forest was underscored by Sadik-Khan’s earlier testimony, when she told the committee that converting single-space meters to muni-meters has resulted in a net gain of 2,785 metered parking spaces citywide.

What also went unmentioned among council members who seemed so pre-occupied with parking revenue is that parking meters are turned off on Sundays, unmetered parking is the very definition of a free-for-all, and meter rates (with the exception of a few neighborhoods) are well below anything even approaching a rate that would result in optimal occupancy, less traffic, and more turnover.

Vacca himself has a long record of fighting against parking rate increases, and that tradition continued today as he claimed victory over an earlier DOT proposal to raise municipal parking lot fees. At the last budget hearing in March, he disclosed that he is a regular user of the Belmont municipal lot in the Bronx and asked DOT to reconsider the rate increase. “I am pleased to learn that the executive budget does not include these increases,” he said today. He should be — it’s less money out of his pocket.

Vacca and Recchia were decidedly more hostile toward bike-share than other council members, many of whom welcomed the new system excitedly and asked when it would expand. “I want to say proudly I am one of the 8,000 people who have signed up for bike-share,” Council Member Jimmy Van Bramer said. “We really want bike-share in western Queens.” Ydanis Rodriguez, who worked as a taxi driver before running for office, also asked DOT to expand bike-share to his district in Upper Manhattan.

In addition to the usual concerns raised by council members about traffic and road maintenance in their districts, the hearing yielded some interesting updates from DOT. Midtown in Motion, which uses high-tech traffic signals to move cars through the city center more quickly, has yielded a 10 percent boost in travel speeds and is on track to be expanded to the area bounded by First Avenue, Ninth Avenue, 42nd Street, and 59th Street by September.

The FY 2014 executive budget also includes funds to install pedestrian countdown signals at 6,000 more intersections by the end of 2014, bringing the popular feature to two-thirds of the city’s 12,000 signalized intersections.

Today was Sadik-Khan’s final budget hearing as DOT commissioner. Making note of the occasion, Recchia said with a laugh, “She’s going to miss Jimmy Vacca, isn’t she?”

  • Bolwerk

    Jimmy Vacca seems to be one of the dumbest, most narcissistic members of the city council. And this is a council headed by milquetoast New Jersey soccer mom Christine Quinn.

  • drrosejr

    Keep repeating … Only 8 more months of Vacca as transportation committee chair…

  • Anonymous

    Wait: “converting single-space meters to muni-meters has resulted in a net gain of 2,785 metered parking spaces citywide”? Why haven’t the car-centric media been celebrating this giant gift to drivers?

  • Anonymous

    “how can the city get more revenue for bike riders?” these politicians are such gangsters. I already pay a hefty city tax. Other people pay city tax and metrocard fees or parking lots. Should we tax pedestrians? What about people on scooters or roller blades? I switched to biking because the cost of car ownership was way too high. I’m pretty liberal but “generating more revenue” is pretty awful here.

  • Eric McClure

    This is the same guy who’s always complaining that enforcement of reasonable traffic and parking laws constitutes some craven money-grab from poor, put-upon ‘real New Yorkers.’

  • Eric McClure

    + Infinity.

  • Eric McClure

    Want to realize revenue from bike share, Jimmy Vacca? Champion its rapid expansion and the kind of cycling infrastructure that will encourage more and more people to use the system.

  • Well, we’ll never miss Jimmy Vacca

  • Voter

    Jimmy Vacca: a 1960s man for a 21st century city.

  • BTW, Vacca’s on twitter now

  • If the the Council wants more revenue from use of the streets, it could require motorists to pay for the city services provided when motor vehicle crashes occur:

  • Daphna

    I am disappointed that the DOT caved in to pressure from these misguided elected officials and dropped their proposed raise in municipal lot parking fees. Those fees are extremely low and even with an increase, would have still been a huge bargain.

    Also, why is this Jeanette Sadik-Khan’s final budget hearing as DOT commissioner?? Has she said she will resign? Or is this just an assumption that the next mayor will not keep her in office? Mayors do not always appoint all new agency commissioners. I am hopeful that she will be kept on, if not for the full term, then at least for a year or so after January 2014.

  • Daphna

    Worth repeating: less than 1% of parking spots were removed for bikeshare docks.

    Worth noting (over and over to Vacca and Recchia): DOT budget: $732.9 million. Cost of bike infrastructure within budget: $9.4 million of which 80% is covered by federal funds, leaving the city to pay $1.88 million. Hence bike related expenditures are only .25% of the DOT budget!!!! (One quarter of one percent!!!) Even if the city has to pay all, it would still only be 1.28% of the DOT budget!

    When is Vacca term limited out? It can not come soon enough!

  • Larry Littlefield

    I just got a flat. I went to a bike shop to get it fixed. I had to pay sales tax on that. Where does that go? Where did it go when there were no bike lanes?

    “Should we tax pedestrians?”

    I repaved my sidewalk last fall. That is a piece of city property. The city maintains the street with my property and income tax dollars. Highways are paid for with gas taxes and tolls, but I can’t walk or ride my bike there.

  • Joe R.

    Can’t wait until this guy retires from politics.

  • Bolwerk

    Almost irrelevant, really. The right of people to move around their community is a moral imperative of human existence. And it’s certainly reasonable to expect them to follow reasonable, mutually consensual “rules” (e.g., what side of the lane to ride your bike, and to some extent where).

    People need to make critical distinctions though: a bike costs almost nothing to accommodate for society on top of the streets we already have. A 2-ton auto is expensive, pollutes, interferes with other traffic, and ultimately offers up fewer benefits than walking, transit, and even biking. Vacca is a hypocrite for expecting to make money on bikes, while refusing to make it on cars.

  • Andrew

    Because that would contradict the claim that Sadik-Khan has given the streets over to bikes.

  • Bicycle Sloth

    Is Vacca really such a complete dumbass? Is it possible for a human being to be so consistently shallow and trivial? Or is he an incredibly on message, lowest common denominator politician in a district dominated by driving primary voters? He’s kind of a DiBlasio lite, assistant whiner in chief for the driving, home owner, class — those sad, sad victims of all things Bloomberg.

  • Larry Littlefield

    “Is Vacca really such a complete dumbass?”

    You don’t get where he is by being a dumbass. However, I begin to wonder what the qualifications in fact are.

  • Anonymous

    He’s not a dumbass, he’s a complete asshole.


Vacca Watch: At Budget Hearing, Council Calms Down, Focuses on Potholes

Call it the case of the missing demagoguery. Yesterday’s City Council transportation budget hearing was less notable for what was said than what wasn’t. Attacks on the city’s proposed parking meter rate increase were largely absent, and the scapegoating of bike lanes and pedestrian plazas that has dominated recent hearings in James Vacca’s committee failed […]

Quick Hits From Today’s City Council Hearing on Bike Policy

The line to testify at today’s Transportation Committee hearing on New York City bike policy was snaking outside into the biting cold well before the 10:00 a.m. start time. More than 70 people signed up to speak, filling up two hearing rooms at 250 Broadway. The first few hours of the hearing, however, belonged to […]

Vacca Watch: Traffic and Parking Über Alles

This double Q & A in City Hall News with Transportation Commissioner Janette Sadik-Khan and City Council Transportation Committee chair James Vacca has a lot of revealing moments. There’s Vacca’s desire for better cross-Bronx bus service, combined with his assessment that the MTA will have to “do more with less” and his observation that “I […]

Vacca Watch: Transpo Chair Stokes Fears of Phantom Bike Lanes on NY1

To borrow from the Wall Street Journal’s Jason Gay, this NY1 segment starring City Council Transportation Chair James Vacca seems to come straight out of the “shrill and embarrassing” early 2011 phase of NYC bike coverage. Once reporter Michael Herzenberg intones in his best investigative journalist voice that “believe it or not, many of the […]

Vacca Watch: Pre-Bike Hearing Chatter Between Transpo Chair Staffer, NBBL

City Council Transportation Committee chair James Vacca has made headlines for his inquisitorial hearings on DOT’s bike and plaza programs. And it looks like his office was batting around ideas with street safety opponents before the first of those hearings last December. Email correspondence obtained by Streetsblog from Marty Markowitz’s office indicates that a Vacca […]