Mayor’s Budget Includes Parking Meter Rate Hike, Red Light Cam Expansion

Transportation Committee Chair James Vacca at a rally against the 25-cent meter rate bump in December. Photo:
Transportation Committee Chair James Vacca at a rally against the 25-cent meter rate bump in December. Photo: YourNabe/Council Member Vacca's office

Mayor Bloomberg’s budget proposal, which was released today, still includes a plan to increase parking meter rates across the city, a plan which the City Council scuttled once in January. The transportation budget also includes an increase in revenue from an expansion of the city’s red light camera program.

The biggest budget fights are sure to be over top-ticket items, like the 6,000 teaching jobs that Bloomberg would cut. But the meter hike will likely be an important subplot as the City Council debates Bloomberg’s budget proposal; Transportation Committee chair James Vacca has already made clear that he will fight to keep down the cost of on-street parking.

The proposal is the same as in the mayor’s preliminary budget, released last February. In Manhattan below 86th Street, meter rates will rise from $2.50 to $3.00 per hour. That change was not challenged by the Council and is likely to move forward smoothly. In the rest of the city and at municipal lots, meter rates will increase from $0.75 to $1.00 per hour.

Overall, the increase in parking meter revenue would raise roughly $20 million next year and $25 million after that. That’s between two-fifths and two-thirds of the entire deficit-closing package for the Department of Transportation, depending on the year, far more than would be saved by planned job cuts, furloughs, or efficiency measures.

When the Bloomberg administration put forward the citywide meter hike last year, however, the City Council made eliminating it a top priority in negotiations. Vacca led that fight and at the time promised to introduce a bill capping the city’s ability to increase meter rates in the future.

If Vacca again fights to keep parking meter rates completely flat — when adjusted for inflation, the city’s meter rate hasn’t risen in 18 years — he’ll be fighting for increased congestion and against small businesses. Meter rates set too low mean it’s nearly impossible to find a parking spot when you need one in many parts of New York City, leading to extra driving as motorists search for a spot and less turnover in front of neighborhood shops.

Moreover, Vacca would be fighting for extra cuts somewhere else in the budget. Increasing meter rates by a quarter an hour would raise $13.8 million each year after the first. According to the Independent Budget Office [PDF], $10 million buys 158 new teachers, 956 Head Start slots, or 10 days of residential garbage disposal. Are those sacrifices that the Council’s chief negotiator, Speaker Christine Quinn, is willing to sign off on?

Even within the realm of transportation, compare the revenue from the meter rate hike to the savings from a one-week furlough of DOT workers included in the budget that will result in 9,000 fewer potholes being fixed each winter: around $1 million a year. Keeping parking extra-cheap could, therefore, theoretically come at the price of an extra 124,000 potholes and all the wear and tear they cause to vehicles.

Another potential controversy buried in the budget is a plan to expand the use of red light enforcement cameras. The number of intersections where the city can install cameras is limited by Albany, but this plan would add extra cameras facing the opposite direction at 20 locations that already have cameras. Red light cameras have been repeatedly shown to reduce crashes and save lives, so the expansion of the program should be a boon to safety.

However, much of the opposition to traffic enforcement cameras comes from a minority who believe their only purpose is to raise revenue. The inclusion of this plan as a revenue item in the city’s deficit-closing plan could be a political liability therefore, giving opponents some evidence to latch onto.

  • carma

    thats great. b/c it also serves making spaces to find a lot easier. kuddos for a double win

  • Cool Beanz

    James Vacca really is a cancer to progressive transport. It seems he attacks the promotion of alternative transportation from every angle possible.

  • Even if the purpose of the red-light cameras is to raise revenue, so what? Someone has to pay taxes. I am OK with a tax on dangerous, illegal drivers.

  • Okay, NYC loses greater than $46-million a year due to lost parking meter revenue because of government employees abusing their parking permits (Schaller Consulting, 2006). That’s a HALF BILLION DOLLARS since Bloomberg’s been in office!! One sure way to raise money is to stop government employees from breaking regulations and posted sign laws, make them stop abusing their parking permits!! Everyone wins!!

  • Doubledar

    Red light cameras also increase rear end accidents, yellow times are often shortened, and it is not uncommon for the vendor of the $cameras to reduce the cost of the equipment for a cut of the bounty. Don’t know for sure if that is the case in NYC but if it is that sure seems to undermine the purpose of the procurement rules in NYC. Sounds like a clear conflict of interest. So, I’ll jam on the brakes when the light turns red…America needs to strike back against this crap.

  • Arent unsourced conspiracy theories just wonderful?

    1) A rear end accident is not an accident. The person doing the rear ending broke the law by following too closely. End of story.

    2) Yellow light timing is dictated by speed limit and intersection width (and sightlines where applicable). There’s not such thing as shortening them for fun. End of story.

  • J:Lai

    not necessarily.

    Although parking abuse by government employees is a major problem, it is not likely to raise significant revenue. Govt employees are such flagrant violators because they know they will not face any consequences. Eliminating placard abuse would most likely lead to behavioral changes such as not parking illegally.

    This would be a very good thing, even if not a significant revenue stream.

  • Dave

    Ridiculous that he raises meter rates without doing anything about the residential parking give-away. RESIDENTIAL PARKING PERMITS NOW!!!! Raising meter rates, reducing the tax exemption for parking garages are all totally wrong.

    Charge for on-street parking and limit permits to those who live in, register their cars in and pay taxes to NYC. Why is this NEVER discussed as a way to raise funds for a cash-starved city?

    As we learned at RPA, in Stockholm it is $100/mo to park on the street. Someone please do the math and let me know how much that would raise for NYC. Thanks.

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

Bloomberg Budget Sets Up Round Two of Parking Meter Fight

|
Mayor Bloomberg unveiled his budget plan yesterday, including hundreds of measures to close a deficit of billions of dollars [PDF]. While the most controversial element may be Bloomberg’s plan to lay off thousands of teachers, included among the smaller-scale deficit-closing measures is one that is sure to set up a fight over transportation policy. The […]

Vacca Looks to Squeeze $ From Bikes, But Won’t Touch the Price of Parking

|
The headline from today’s City Council transportation committee oversight hearing was Janette Sadik-Khan’s announcement that the official launch date for Citi Bike is Memorial Day. Meanwhile, for Transportation Committee Chair James Vacca, it was another occasion to flail at bikes and defend cheap parking under the guise of holding a budget hearing. Sadik-Khan kicked off the hearing […]

Vacca, City Council Agree to Deeper Budget Cuts to Keep Parking Cheap

|
Speaker Christine Quinn’s office just announced that the City Council has reached a budget deal with the Bloomberg administration, restoring some services slated for cuts and targeting others instead. There’s also one case where the council successfully fought to prevent the city from raising revenue to fund more services. A proposal to increase parking meter […]

Manhattan Parking Meter Rates Increase, Nobody Notices

|
Did you hear? It didn’t get press coverage, but a week ago rates for on-street parking in Manhattan below 110th Street increased by 50 cents. The lack of attention this story has gotten is truly amazing, given the media’s usual windshield perspective. As of January 25, meters below 96th Street now charge $3.50 an hour, […]

What City Do Christine Quinn and James Vacca Represent?

|
In February, no fewer than nine people were killed by drivers while walking in NYC, according to data compiled by Streetsblog. The victims included five seniors and a 6-year-old child. Two victims were on the sidewalk when they were killed. Another was struck by an NYPD officer in a crash that police refuse to explain […]