Despite NY Post Report to Contrary, Stringer Supports BRT for 34th Street

Manhattan Borough President Scott Stringer supports the idea of BRT along 34th Street, though you'd think quite the opposite from reading the Post. Photo: ##http://www.flickr.com/photos/mbpo/5445184385/##BP's Office via Flickr.##

The Post’s unhinged crusade against the 34th Street Transitway appears to be bleeding over from the editorial page into news content. The paper ran a story yesterday strongly implying that Manhattan Borough President Scott Stringer opposes plans for separated bus lanes along 34th Street (headline: “Beep blasts 34th St. plan”), while in reality, Stringer seems to support the basic idea of the plan, urging mainly that DOT proceed with care. Here’s Stringer’s statement to us, in full:

The sluggish pace of vehicular traffic on 34th Street makes it a worthy candidate for Bus Rapid Transit service. BRT has the potential to significantly cut down on harmful traffic congestion — we’ve already seen bus travel times reduced by 20 percent along the new First and Second Avenue routes.

But before we redesign this crucial thoroughfare, we need to engage in an environmental review that will clarify potential impacts on the residents, workers and visitors of 34th Street. Loss of curbside access could hurt local businesses and many residents worry that major traffic reconfigurations could block emergency vehicle access to the East Side Hospital corridor.

I look forward to seeing the design that the Department of Transportation will present at the March 14th Community Advisory Committee meeting, and will continue to engage with DOT and the local community to encourage a plan that works for all.

The Post used a Stringer quote about slow speeds on 34th Street to suggest he thinks the street is too congested for improved bus service. In context, Stringer clearly says the opposite, that slow speeds are a reason to support Bus Rapid Transit.

Stringer’s comments obviously don’t offer unconditional support for DOT’s plans, and he does not explicitly endorse a physically separated busway. (It’s worth noting in response to his concerns that DOT is already proceeding with the environmental review process, and that Dan Biederman, the head of the 34th Street Partnership, thinks the businesses he represents will benefit from the plan if it meets some basic conditions.) But in general, this is the statement of someone who wants to see Bus Rapid Transit advance beyond Manhattan’s first taste of Select Bus Service on the East Side. The Post owes its readers a correction.

  • LOLcat

    When will newspapers be held accountable for flat out lying. This type of shit boils my blood.

  • Pete

    LOLcat – unfortunately, there’s no law against news organizations lying. Courts have ruled that they’re within their rights to do so.

  • fdr

    Murdoch newspapers all over the world are known for biased reporting. Only difference with the Post is no photos of topless women.

  • Bolwerk

    I don’t see what difference Stringer’s support or opposition should make here, just as I don’t see why PPW should be canceled because Marty Markotwitz [sic] thinks nobody should ever go outdoors. Should the people who matter, the pedestrians and bus users putting up with the pollution and aggressive driving, suffer because some elected official doesn’t like change? I think what’s important, and what should be encouraged, is Stringer is being constructive. Even if he were constructively against the project, I think that would be fine.

  • LOLcat

    Pete – the fairness doctrine still exists in my moral mind.

  • Lisa

    I’m sort of struck by Stringer’s comments about encouraging a plan that “works for all.” Why do we want a plan that works for “ALL?” The current situation doesn’t really work for those using mass transit, and the walking conditions are horrible. Why don’t we encourage a plan that works for the majority, i.e. the overwhelming percent who take mass transit and walk in this area?

  • Danny G

    A traffic-separated busway would do wonders for emergency vehicle access to the hospitals of the East Side. Just put on the sirens and take the busway, seems a no-brainer.

  • Andrew

    “A traffic-separated busway would do wonders for emergency vehicle access to the hospitals of the East Side. Just put on the sirens and take the busway, seems a no-brainer.”

    THIS

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

City Scraps Pedestrian Plaza Option for 34th Street Transitway

|
Pedestrians who navigate Midtown’s crowded sidewalks won’t get as much as they could have from the proposed 34th Street Transitway. The Times reported last night that NYC DOT will not pursue plans for a pedestrian plaza between Fifth Avenue and Sixth Avenue as part of the project. The plaza was the focus of serialized attacks […]

Stringer: Bus Lane Blocking Rampant, NYPD Nowhere to Be Found

|
Manhattan Borough President Scott Stringer is calling for a crackdown on bus lane-blocking drivers after a survey conducted by his office found that offending motorists have little chance of receiving a ticket. A truck driver enjoys the convenience of the 34th Street SBS lane. Photo: Brad Aaron Stringer staffers observed more than 350 drivers parked […]

Tonight: Give DOT Your Ideas for the Future of 34th Street

|
Will NYPD cruisers and other bus lane blockers steer clear of the next transit improvement on 34th Street? Photo: Chris O’Leary. Last September DOT and the MTA launched the 34th Street bus lane, New York City’s second Select Bus Service route. You could say it’s had some growing pains. Bus riders aren’t getting the speedy, […]

A Transit Miracle on 34th Street

|
NYC DOT is proposing to turn Manhattan’s 34th Street into a river-to-river "transitway." In what she half-jokingly called "probably the first-ever co-presentation" between their two agencies, Department of Transportation Commissioner Janette Sadik-Khan stood with New York City Transit President Howard Roberts earlier this week to unveil the city’s current Bus Rapid Transit program in its […]