Great Public Spaces for Midtown

times_square_after_before.jpgThe new Times Square versus the old Times Square — worth a few seconds of motorist inconvenience on a few streets. Photos: berk2804 and midweekpost via Flickr

Mayor Bloomberg has seen some of the data from the city’s trial of car-free, pedestrian-priority spaces in Midtown, and it looks like the changes in traffic speeds are not as impressive as hoped for. This, I daresay, is good news.

As the Times’ Michael Grynbaum has reminded us the past two days, Broadway’s new pedestrian spaces were sold with a heavy emphasis on easing Midtown gridlock. Safety and economic activity were important indicators from the beginning, but the name of the project said it all: Green Light for Midtown.

The numbers aren’t out yet, but Bloomberg revealed at a press conference yesterday that, in terms of moving vehicles, "some of the roads are better; some of the roads are worse." It seems like the trial hasn’t quite delivered a win-win-win scenario where pedestrians, merchants, and motorists all received substantial benefits. Instead, we’re probably heading for a result that’s closer to "win-win-tie."

If you care about livable streets, I think this is a welcome development. It means New York City gets to have a more substantial discussion about what our streets are for and the priorities we assign to them. Ambiguous traffic data leads straight to the question, "What matters more — safety and livability, or moving cars?"

Bloomberg is already framing the project in terms of safety. "It’s not just traffic," he said at yesterday’s presser.
"One of the things that has happened is
pedestrian deaths have come down dramatically in this area. And I don’t
know how you equate a few lives with a few more seconds of
inconvenience."

Amen. The Broadway project is worth doing for several reasons that have nothing to do with vehicle speeds. It’s saving lives and improving the public realm for hundreds of thousands of people who used to squeeze onto the sidewalk like poultry in an industrial chicken coop. New Yorkers have noticed, and they approve. Judging from anecdotal merchant reactions and the position of the Times Square Alliance, it’s been good for business too.

The most important graphic from the city’s initial presentation on this project came under the "additional benefits" section, shortly after the slide about "green signal time allocation."

broadway_safety.jpg

I, for one, can’t wait to read the next Steve Cuozzo column ripping apart the life-saving transformation of Midtown.

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

Bloomberg, Sadik-Khan Commit to a World-Class, 21st Century Broadway

|
New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg, DOT Commissioner Janette Sadik-Khan, and leaders from the Midtown business community announced this morning that the new public spaces along Broadway will become permanent features of the city’s landscape now that an eight-month trial period has ended. The city will seek to build on the trial project’s success by […]

The New York of 2016 Needs the Wide, Generous Sidewalks of 1906

|
The Times ran a feature on the pedestrian crush in New York City today, and as good as the photos are, they don’t do the situation justice. To get a sense of just how inadequate the sidewalks are in Midtown, you need to go there — or failing that, watch this Streetfilm from 2009 with narration by Streetsblog publisher Mark […]

It’s de Blasio and Bratton vs. the World on Times Square Plazas

|
Let’s start with some basic facts: Most people like Times Square better now that it has more room for people. Gone are the days when the sidewalks were so meager that you had no choice but to walk in traffic. After Broadway went car-free through Times Square in 2009, pedestrian injuries plummeted 40 percent. Retail rents soared. And yet, going against […]