What If Pricing Had a Better Name?

A commentator at the Wall Street Journal blog Buzzwatch posits that congestion pricing would have stood a better chance if it had a better name. After asking branding specialists for a more appealing moniker, here’s what rose to the top:

  • StreetSmart – Burt Alper, Catchword Branding
  • FreeFlow and ClearPass – George Frazier, Idiom Brand Identity
  • TrafficEase – Allen Adamson, Landor Associates
  • GreenWay and ClearWay – James Bell, Lippincott
  • EZ-Zone – Upstate NY Dem, commenter

Even if pricing had been called "Puppies for Orphans," however, the big hurdle wasn’t so much popular support. The last Q poll showed public opinion at 2 to 1 in favor, assuming funds went to transit as planned, so it’s hard to see how a name alone could have thwarted the deliberate efforts of politicians to misrepresent the plan as regressive, or their timidity in taking a stand on something seen as controversial. Did Sheldon Silver and Richard Brodsky care what it was called?

I found "congestion pricing" to be an honest and straightforward label. And, as Zubin Jelveh points out at his blog Odd Numbers, other cities that have enacted congestion pricing didn’t exactly opt for a streamlined brand:

  • Congestion Charge – London, U.K.
  • Toll Collect – Germany
  • Electronic Road Pricing – Singapore
  • Valletta Congestion Charge – Valletta, Malta
  • Congestion Tax – Stockholm, Sweden

Jelveh also has an update on the latest city to adopt pricing, Milan, which did go the sexy name route, with "EcoPass": 

  • Traffic was down 22.7%
  • Average speed of vehicles was up 11.3%
  • Subway use was up 9.1%
  • Pm10 (particulates under 10 micrograms) levels were down 26%
  • NOx levels were down 21%
  • Ammonia levels were down by 40%

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

Three Questions for Richard Brodsky

|
We called Assemblyman Richard Brodsky yesterday to get his comments on the demise of congestion pricing. While he wouldn’t talk to us on the phone, he fielded a few questions over e-mail.  Streetsblog: With congestion pricing off the table and the deadline to receive $354M in federal support about to pass, will other traffic mitigation […]

Congestion Pricing Q&A With Rohit Aggarwala, Part 1

|
Too many unanswered questions. Among New York State Assembly Democrats, that has been one of the most frequent criticisms of Mayor Bloomberg’s proposal for a three-year congestion pricing pilot project in New York City. Last month, Lower Manhattan Assembly member Deborah Glick said that she and her colleagues were “confronted with a dearth of information […]

Pricing Friends and Foes Find Common Ground in Shoup

|
Matthew Schuerman at the Observer reports that New York City congestion pricing opponents sought to commission UCLA urban planning guru Donald Shoup to do a study of New York City’s parking policies. Shoup declined their request. Presumably, congestion pricing opponents hoped a Shoup study might show that New York City could solve some portion of […]

Paterson: “We’re Taking a Look” at Pricing

|
David Paterson held his first press conference as governor-in-waiting this afternoon, holding forth to a Red Room described by Elizabeth Benjamin of the Daily News as "more crowded than I have ever seen it in the almost 10 years I’ve been covering Albany." Self-deprecating and genuinely funny, Paterson fielded questions on the budget, campaign finance […]