Paterson: “We’re Taking a Look” at Pricing

David Paterson held his first press conference as governor-in-waiting this afternoon, holding forth to a Red Room described by Elizabeth Benjamin of the Daily News as "more crowded than I have ever seen it in the almost 10 years I’ve been covering Albany."

Self-deprecating and genuinely funny, Paterson fielded questions on the budget, campaign finance reform, and the fate of Eliot Spitzer, among other issues. When asked about congestion pricing, he offered only this:

"On congestion pricing, we’re taking a look at it."

There are conflicting views about whether Paterson’s ascension will help or hurt. Bypassing the haters who have practically made a vocation of declaring the plan dead, the Staten Island Advance talked to local lawmakers on both sides of the aisle, each of them offering what sounded like well-reasoned — if not always optimistic — prognoses.

City Councilman Michael McMahon (D) told the Advance:

"Without knowing, I can’t imagine that new Gov. Paterson would be able or willing to put that much behind it in the next two weeks. He’s got to figure out his staff and everything else."

And here’s Republican Councilman James Oddo:

"It almost takes a crisis for (Albany) to act at all," "This is actually an opportunity to get people around the table . . . and actually get a few things accomplished, maybe perhaps one of which is congestion pricing."

Note that both McMahon and Oddo are opposed to pricing, at least in its current form.

Though it names no sources, New York Magazine’s Daily Intelligencer believes having a new governor at the helm could provide a boost.

Paterson should be so eager for a positive political climate that he’ll be inclined to bring together what one veteran lobbyist calls the "Big Ugly" — a massive deal in which lawmakers get raises, Bloomberg gets congestion pricing, and the governor gets something or another — without making the tough campaign-finance-reform demands that Spitzer had wanted.

What do you think?


Pricing Bill Appears in Albany; Bloomberg and Paterson Meet

From The Daily Politics: While members of the City Council haven’t seen it, a congestion pricing bill drafted by the Bloomberg administration has popped up in Albany over the last 24 hours, although it does not yet have a sponsor and hasn’t been introduced. Here is a PDF of the 41-page bill (caution: it’s a […]

More Mixed Signals on Pricing’s Chances Under Paterson

  "Today is Monday. There is work to be done." So said David Paterson, who was sworn in as New York’s 55th governor just after 1:00 this afternoon. Two Mondays from now, the City Council and state Legislature will need to have adopted a congestion pricing plan if the city is to receive $354 million […]

Paterson Backs Pricing, Introduces Bill in Albany

David Paterson is going to do right by his old State Senate district after all. New York’s new governor settled any doubts about his position on congestion pricing this afternoon, introducing a bill that follows the recommendations of the Traffic Congestion Mitigation Commission. The Daily Politics has the scoop: "Congestion pricing addresses two urgent concerns […]

Pricing Round Up: Persuasive Arguments, Rigged Polls, New Buses

With a congestion pricing bill now on the table and the days to get it passed quickly winding down, here is a snapshot of where a handful of electeds, including heavy-hitters like David Paterson and Sheldon Silver, stand. First, the Times quotes Governor Paterson, following his sit-down with Mayor Bloomberg yesterday afternoon: "The mayor, I […]

What Paterson’s Senate District Stands to Gain From Pricing

With conflicting reports on congestion pricing’s status in Albany, and given his own ambiguous statements, it remains to be seen whether Governor David Paterson will get behind the plan — though a look at census data published by the Tri State Transportation Campaign shows that most of those he once represented in the New York […]