The Week in Review


New York City Director of Long-Term Planning and Sustainability, Rohit Aggarwala, takes questions at the first meeting of the Traffic Congestion Mitigation Commission, Tuesday
.

  • Back in June, a perplexed Richard Brodsky and Denny Farrell peppered Mayor Bloomberg and his top aides with a series of questions and comments aimed not so much at clarifying City Hall’s congestion pricing plan but to build a case that the Mayor hasn’t provided anywhere near enough information for serious-minded Assembly members possibly to consider such a plan. This scene, minus Mayor Bloomberg, repeated itself at the first meeting of the Traffic Congestion Mitigation Commission, or — as it’s known by pretty much anyone who isn’t a member of the New York State Assembly — the Congestion Pricing Commission. Instead of devoting a little time over the past few months to study up on the plan — or, heck, develop a concrete alternative or two — Brodsky and Farrell were content to repeat their June performances. CP_hearing_brodsky.jpgBrodsky, who seems intent on proving that the federal government’s promise of $354.5 million in grant money is some sort of elaborate hoax, claimed he still just "don’t get it." Meanwhile, Farrell, the 33-year member of the State Assembly, seemed unfamiliar with the concept of imposing a fee in order to discourage injurious behavior, asking: "Is it a tax or is it to lower the amount of vehicles coming in?" Responded Streetsblog commenter Budrick: "For anyone who has taken at least one high school or college class on
    Economics, this is an extremely frustrating question, and a scary one
    coming from a politician who’s been in the business of making taxes and
    encouraging/discouraging behaviors through public policy for decades."
  • Speaking of supply and demand, writer and latent urban planning guru Gregg Easterbrook took on Donald Shoup in his Thursday ESPN sports column. Having stumbled across "The High Cost of Free Parking," in which the author "has thrown a new idea into the topic," Easterbrook has decided Shoup’s thoroughly researched theories and practices miss the mark. Parking, Easterbrook says, is all about motorist stress. And it’s the government’s job — and everyone else’s, apparently — to reduce it by ceding as much space to the car as possible. Easterbrook counters Shoup’s "expertise" with a little back-of-the-envelope math and undeniable common sense observations, such as: "I’ve done the equivalent of perhaps 100 miles of walking along Manhattan streets, and never once seen a fully legal, free, on-street parking space that was open." When you’re done flailing in vain to poke holes in that penetrating analysis, check out Purdue University’s effort to inventory parking spots across the nation, as profiled in the Christian Science Monitor. Interestingly, the Monitor called on Shoup, not Easterbrook, for comment on the Purdue study. Perhaps if Shoup starts choosing a Cheerleader of the Week he can get a gig at ESPN too.
  • The DOT appears to have finished its work on Ninth Ave. and 14th Street, quickly transforming, "one of the longest and most hectic pedestrian crossings in Manhattan" into a picturesque public plaza that Streetsblog has dubbed, "Meat Market Plaza." Already popular with Meatpacking District smokers, we think the name will stick. The Meat Market will soon be enjoyed by cyclists arriving via the city’s new Ninth Ave. "cycle track," which is already under construction, and has Fifth Ave. bike riders (those who still have their bikes, anyway) clamoring for more. Moving uptown, Upper West Siders convened for the first in a years-long series of discussions on the future of street use from West 55th to 86th Streets. And waaay uptown, Inwoodites wait for the DOT and NYPD to decide which department is responsible for improvements to a deadly Broadway intersection at Fort Tryon Park.
  • Upper East Side City Council Member Jessica Lappin scored big in these parts with her proposal to crack down on businesses that employ bike delivery workers. As City Room wrote, "Although she did not have statistical evidence, Ms. Lappin said she
    believed that workers who use bikes are in general less responsible
    than recreational cyclists, who, she said, were more likely to use
    helmets and obey traffic laws." A presumption of Easterbrookian proportions, to be sure. Added commenter Smith: "The solution to this problem is taking away a travel or parking lane
    on the avenues and converting it to a two-way, separated bike path
    similar to what DOT is doing on 9th Ave in Chelsea." Now to get that idea into the head of a nine-year-old, letter-writing Lappin constituent.
  • And finally, back to congestion pricing for our quote of the week, courtesy of long-time Streetsblog commenter, Doc Barnett. A last word if ever there was: "A lot of us would love to ‘ban cars,’ but we know it ain’t gonna
    happen. And though I know pricing will work far better (and is the only
    system that fairly rewards people not driving), I would take
    Mexico city or Athens style rationing over the free-for-all that we
    have now. But guess what? Ain’t gonna happen! This here’s the USA, where resources are regulated by capitalism.
    It’s the only way we’re any good at regulating anything, and it’s the
    way we will succeed in regulating automobile over-consumption. It might
    set people’s rusty old class warfare alarms off, because this is a new
    kind of regulation that we’re being forced to engage in, but there are
    more important things than that. Like saving lives. Of working people
    hit by cars, and the health of people breathing auto emissions, and the
    mental health of everyone having to walk around, listen to the horns
    of, and run out of the path of these giant iron-clad wheelchairs that
    suburbanites think they need to GO anywhere. There is nothing fair about a system that gives away an expensive
    public resource only to those above a certain income threshold who
    choose to spend it on machines that are ecologically destructive and
    make accidental homicide commonplace. It’s time to let it go."

Photo: Aaron Naparstek. Tag your shots with "streetsblog" to add them to our Flickr photo pool.

  • Dave

    A few more thoughts on traffic mitigation without CP:
    – Ban street fairs on anything but side streets. It has been a long time since the major street fairs had any local character and they are now basically a scam: a local charity gets a minimal donation and the organizer and vendors make money while wreaking havoc on city traffic. Face it, the vendors are not local, the shoppers are not local and the vendors sell schlock while paying no rent and probably minimal taxes.
    – Reintroduce Sunday meters. I was dumbfounded that the church lobby won out on this; you now let people park fro free from Saturday 7pm to Monday morning. Maybe lengthen the time allowed Sunday mornings for the church-goers (two hours should be enough) but don’t allow people to park for free for such a long time.
    – Take away parking spots and convert them to loading zones. Wide streets on the Upper East and West sides should have no parking during the week…you’d see a lot less double-parking. The same should be done for the avenues…put meters 1/3 the way down the side streets for “shoppers” to appease the merchants and let delivery trucks use the curb instead of double-parking.

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

Traffic Congestion Mitigation Commission Opens for Business

|
Westchester Assembly member Richard Brodsky on Mayor Bloomberg’s congestion pricing proposal: "My problem is that I don’t understand what you’ve proposed." "This is going to be interesting," Straphangers Campaign Senior Staff Attorney Gene Russianoff said as he waited for the start of yesterday’s inaugural Traffic Congestion Mitigation Commission meeting. "Usually with these things, the fix […]

From a Sea of Green, Bloomberg Works a Tough Room

|
Flanked by dozens, if not hundreds, of citizen spectators in bright green "I Breathe and I Vote" t-shirts, Mayor Michael Bloomberg and city staffers this morning made the case for a three-year congestion pricing pilot program to a largely hostile cadre of state Assembly members. Seated alongside ten colleagues in the auditorium of the New […]

Will Silver Defer to City Council on Congestion Pricing?

|
While we weren’t looking, Assembly Speaker Sheldon Silver apparently had a change of heart on congestion pricing, and is reportedly now willing to go along with some version of the plan, as long as it is supported by City Council Democrats. This little bombshell comes courtesy of the Sun: The good news for Mayor Bloomberg […]

August 1: The Mayor Shall Submit the Traffic Mitigation Plan

|
A couple of weeks ago Mayor Bloomberg, Governor Spitzer, Senate Leader Bruno and Assembly Speaker Silver agreed to a process that would lead to the formation of a 17-member commission that would evaluate and decide on New York City’s congestion pricing proposal. The deal laid out a very specific timeline by which the process would […]

Revenge of the Free Riders

|
From Transportation Alternatives’ Spring 2008 magazine: The biggest hurdle congestion pricing faced was the simple fact that the people required to enact the legislation were the ones who stood to pay the most because of it. On Monday, April 7, Sheldon Silver walked out of a closed door meeting of State Assembly Democrats and announced […]

Congestion Pricing Process Moves Forward in Albany

|
This afternoon the New York State Assembly voted 122-16 and the Senate voted 39-16 in favor of the process that would establish a 17-member commission to develop traffic mitigation measures for New York City. The commission’s plan would be required to produce a 6.3% reduction in average vehicle miles traveled in New York City. Mayor […]