The Congestion Pricing Timeline

Yesterday, New York State’s Four Men in a Room agreed to a process that may or may not result in congestion pricing for New York City. Even by Albany standards, Bloomberg, Spitzer, Silver and Bruno’s deal is incredibly complex. The deal, which is supposed to be formalized by a vote in the state legislature shortly, lays out very specific deadlines that must be achieved before New York City is granted the power to collect congestion charges. The first step in even beginning to understand the implications of yesterday’s deal is to understand the timeline that it set forth.

Here, as best we can tell, is the congestion pricing timeline:

In the next two weeks: The state legislature votes on the "deal" and it is signed by the governor. This must happen soon since the commission is slated to start work.

By August 1, 2007: A 17-member Commission appointed by the Governor, Mayor, State Senate, Assembly and City Council are presented with the mayor’s plan. They may hold hearings or consider a wide variety of options before producing an "Implementation Plan." The Implementation Plan doesn’t necessarily have to include congestion pricing but must come up with some way to reduce average vehicle miles traveled by 6.3%, as promised to the US Dept. of Transportation.

August 8, 2007: US DOT announces the recipients of $1.2 billion in federal grants. If New York does not receive at least $200 million, the deal is off.

By October 1, 2007: The US DOT must have committed at least $200 million to the Implementation Plan. Likewise, the MTA must explain to the Commission the impacts of the Implementation Plan on its budget and operations by this date.

By December 31, 2007: The City or US DOT have to have committed at least $250 million or the deal is off. (The US DOT is being asked to give New York the money before the commission produces it’s implementation plan.)

By January 31, 2008: The Commission must votes on an Implementation Plan. The Implementation Plan is supposed to be the consensus document underlying all legislation. As noted above, the Plan must reduce traffic as much as the mayor’s plan.

By March 28, 2008: The City Council must vote to approve the "Implementation Plan," send a home rule message to the state legislature. A home rule message is a request from a city or town council to the state legislature asking them to vote on legislation affecting only that town or city.

By March 31, 2008: The MTA must have submitted a capital program for the period covering July 1, 2008 through December 31, 2013, an 18-month acceleration of the typical MTA capital program process. Likewise, the New York State Assembly and Senate must vote on the Implementation Plan by March 31, 2008.

On June 30, 2012: The legislation will expire.

One immediate question that comes to mind: What would a federal law suit demanding a time-consuming environmental impact study do to the timeline and the "deal?"

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

Congestion Pricing: What’s the Deal?

|
Nobody knows whether the convoluted and difficult congestion pricing "deal" reached by political leaders yesterday will actually result in anything. The deal is complex even by Albany standards. A few things, however, are clear: Mayor Bloomberg does not have a "green light" to move forward with congestion pricing, nor has he been granted any new […]

Congestion Pricing: Here’s the Deal

|
Below is a summary of the congestion pricing deal struck this afternoon by Governor Spitzer, Mayor Bloomberg, Assembly Speaker Silver and Senate Leader Bruno. The 17 member congestion pricing commission is made up as follows: 3 appointees — Mayor 3 appointees — Governor 3 appointees — City Council 3 appointees — State Senate majority leader […]

MTA Says it Needs More Money for Congestion Pricing

|
The deal that produced the 17-member Congestion Mitigation Commission mandated the MTA to "submit comments on the Mayor’s [congestion pricing] plan" by October 1, 2007. In these comments, the MTA was instructed to provide the Commission with three items: (a) a description of the additional capital needs required for implementation; (b) proposed utilization of any […]

Congestion Pricing: Bloomberg Needs to Sweeten the Deal

|
Webster Avenue and Fordham Road, the Bronx Congestion pricing is in trouble. With just weeks to go before the Traffic Mitigation Commission makes its recommendations to the City Council and State Legislature, public support is waning and opponents appear to have the upper hand. The one sales pitch that scored high in public opinion polls, […]

Glick’s Excuse: Everything But the Kitchen Sink

|
Welcome to Glickville As Deborah Glick herself would tell you, no state legislator had more reason to support congestion pricing than she did. In a district where 95.4 percent of working residents would not have paid the charge, where households with a car are outnumbered by households sans vehicle three to one, and which nonetheless […]