Roberts: MTA Needs Congestion Pricing

When NYC Transit President Howard Roberts announced Monday — to some ridicule — that certain subway lines are overcrowded with little to no relief in sight, it was reported that the system would not be able to handle the influx of commuters who are expected to switch to transit should congestion pricing be implemented.

397225812_7ee4cfae62_o_2.jpgConsidering the consistency of the articles, it seems less likely that the newspapers — which by and large support pricing — spun Roberts’ remarks and more likely that the transit chief, let’s say, gave the wrong impression. After all, congestion pricing would be a boon to the MTA, providing funds to upgrade subway lines, extend bus service on overtaxed or underserved routes, and improve bus rapid transit and ferry service — and much of this in advance of pricing, thanks to an expected $500 million federal allocation. Also, even if 10 percent of Manhattan-bound drivers make the mode shift (an estimate considered to be on the high end), it would equate to a mere 2 percent jump in transit ridership, spread across subway and bus lines throughout the boroughs.

When his warnings were interpreted as a knock at pricing, Roberts summoned reporters back to his office.

Metro reports:

Amid all the bad news, the president of NYC Transit feared an
underlying message had been lost about the benefits of Mayor Michael
Bloomberg’s proposed congestion pricing plan.

 
During rush hours, the busiest train lines — including the 2,
3, 4, 5, 6 and E — are running at or over capacity. Yet Roberts
insisted the system could still “fully support” the increased ridership
projected from congestion pricing. “In fact the current strain on parts
of the system is a big argument in favor of congestion pricing, not
against it,” he said.

Roberts believes the business-day toll could pay for subway
improvements and for such big-ticket projects as the first leg of the
Second Avenue Subway, which is already $1 billion short.

On Monday, Roberts proposed quick “fixes,” including adding
more cars to trains and extending station platforms. But these remedies
would take “four or five” years. More importantly, they all require
money the MTA doesn’t have.

“Congestion pricing is critical to putting these fixes into place,” Roberts said yesterday.

Photo: Scott Beale/Laughing Squid

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

MTA Capital Plan Calls for $4.5B in Pricing Revenues

|
  The MTA released a five-year, $29.5 billion capital plan today. As expected, the agency’s course relies heavily on congestion pricing, to the tune of $4.5 billion in revenue. Highlights of the three-tiered plan: Tier 1 ($20 billion) includes 590 new subway cars, 2,976 buses, 440 commuter rail cars, 44 subway station rehabilitations, and system-wide […]

Congestion Pricing: Bloomberg Needs to Sweeten the Deal

|
Webster Avenue and Fordham Road, the Bronx Congestion pricing is in trouble. With just weeks to go before the Traffic Mitigation Commission makes its recommendations to the City Council and State Legislature, public support is waning and opponents appear to have the upper hand. The one sales pitch that scored high in public opinion polls, […]

Congestion Pricing Bill: Fun With Legalese

|
After months of following the step-by-step evolution of the congestion pricing proposal, there’s a certain satisfaction in seeing familiar concepts codified in legislative language. To wit, we hope readers who’ve been tracking Streetsblog’s coverage of this topic enjoy these excerpts from the bill. Parse away. On short-term transit improvements: The authority [MTA] shall provide for […]