Hyper Motorization in China: Is There No Way Back?

NYU Wagner Rudin Center for Transportation Policy and Management and CUNY Institute for Urban Systems present …

Hyper Motorization in China: Is There No Way Back?

A talk by Dr. Lee Schipper, Director of Research, EMBARQ – The World Resources Institute Center for Sustainable Transport.

By any definition, China’s urban transport is becoming less sustainable. Congestion, traffic accidents and fatalities, as well as urban air pollution from the transport sector have all been increasing over the past two decades. For both accidents and pollution, the accidents or emissions per km of many pollutants are falling, but not as rapidly as the total distance traveled is increasing, particularly distance that individual passenger automobiles travel. And the rise of individual motorized vehicles means that more and more pedestrians and cyclists are crowded off city streets.

The speed of China’s motorization is at the root of the problem. China is currently experiencing "hypermotorization" – when the ownership of cars grows so rapidly that the public and private infrastructure required cannot keep pace with private ownership and use of cars. Policies to slow the growth in private vehicle usage must be established quickly to save the cities of China from the present crunch becoming worse. The alternative must be based on a strengthening of bus, rail, and above all non-motorized modes in Chinese cities, cemented by careful land use planning to avoid the sprawl of cities beyond what these modes can usefully share. We offer the example of Hanoi, Vietnam, one of the most motorized cities in the world, where two-wheelers might provide a degree of individual mobility with far less demands on space, fuel, and at lower speeds, theoretically less congestion and fewer fatalities.

This presentation is adapted from the introduction of the forthcoming volume "Urban Transport Options in China: The Challenge to Choose," Lee Schipper and Wei-Shiuen Ng, eds. Sponsored by the Energy Foundation and the Hewlett Foundation.

A more detailed abstract of this talk is available via pdf.


The Subway Should Be Free

George Haikalis of the Institute for Rational Urban Mobility, with microphone. Environmentalist Theodore W. Kheel, seated next to him, at far right, would reduce the subway fare to nothing. On December 23, 1943, the New York City subways carried more than 8 million people, said the labor relations arbitrator and environmentalist Theodore W. Kheel last night at […]

Congestion Charging on the Horizon for China’s Cities

Which Chinese city will be the first to try congestion pricing? Beijing, Guangzhou, Shanghai — megacities whose populations are on the scale of New York’s? Or second-tier but still mighty cities (think Chicago) like Hangzhou, Nanjing, or Xi’an? Road tolling à la American turnpikes and thruways is already extensive in China, as a means to […]

Vision Zero NYC: Ending the Body Count

Vision Zero is about more than looking both ways. The following article, "Ending the Body Count," appears in the upcoming fall edition of Transportation Alternatives’ Reclaim Magazine. Last year, I wrote a letter to the NYC Department of Transportation asking for traffic calming on 65th Street near my home in Bensonhurst, Brooklyn. Several elderly pedestrians […]

Suburban Poverty and the Transit Connection

Today on the Streetsblog Network, Yonah Freemark of The Transport Politic looks at the new Brookings Institution report on suburban poverty levels and the connection to future transportation planning in those regions. Freemark, who recently wrote about how the city of Paris is extending its transit infrastructure to its traditionally lower-income suburbs, points out that […]