Measuring Uber Traffic Would Be Impossible Under Cuomo’s Ride-Hailing Bill

Photo: Shuggy/Flickr
Photo: Shuggy/Flickr

Yesterday, we got a reminder of why transportation planners and transit advocates view access to Uber trip data as an essential tool, when analyst Bruce Schaller published a groundbreaking report on the effect of ride-hailing services on New York City streets and traffic. The growth of app-based ride-hailing services is, in fact, leading to more congestion, Schaller concluded.

Schaller relied on copious trip data from Uber, Lyft, and other companies to produce the report. That same data, however, would not be obtainable under the disclosure provisions currently laid out in Governor Cuomo’s statewide “Uber” bill, which applies to the rest of the state outside of NYC.

In a letter to Assembly insurance chair Kevin Cahill yesterday, John Kaehny of the good government group Reinvent Albany warns that the absence of disclosure rules could have dire consequences for transportation planning in New York state [PDF].

As currently written, both Cuomo’s bill and the State Senate’s bill would require so-called transportation network companies (TNC’s) to maintain seven years of trip records — including date, time, and location for each trip. But state regulators would only be able to visually inspect a “sample” of the data “chosen randomly” twice a year.

Kaehny calls it an “absurd” process that would amount to “an essentially useless charade.”

In New York City, TNC trip information is available on the city’s open data feeds and “has allowed the public to make informed analysis about the impact of TNC’s on NYC traffic and congestion — which appear to be extensive,” Kaehny writes. The Taxi and Limousine Commission just voted to require TNC’s to disclose trip destinations in addition to origins.

That information would not be publicly accessible under the terms of the Albany bills. In addition to clouding the picture in upstate cities, it will be difficult for New York City to assess the extent to which for-hire drivers based in neighboring counties are making trips inside the five boroughs.

Ride-hailing services should be legal throughout the state, but the companies also need to be open with their data so the public can understand their impact on the transportation system.

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

The statewide Uber bill doesn't contain adequate safeguards to prevent illegal pick-ups in the five boroughs, advocates warn. Photo: Max Pixel

Advocates Call on Carl Heastie to Fix Statewide Uber Bill

|
In letters to Assembly Speaker Carl Heastie and Insurance Committee chair Kevin Cahill, leaders of Transportation Alternatives and the Tri-State Transportation Campaign warn that Governor Cuomo's Uber bill could lead to illegal ride-hail traffic in the five boroughs with no way to assess the problem and rein it in, if necessary.

Will Cuomo Sign the Transit Lockbox Bill?

|
The transit lockbox bill, which would require Albany to disclose the impacts of any raid of dedicated transit funds, passed both the Senate and Assembly unanimously in the final days of the legislative session, reports the Tri-State Transportation Campaign. It now heads to Governor Andrew Cuomo’s desk. A nearly identical bill reached Cuomo in 2011, […]