DA Cy Vance: $250 Fine for Motorist Accused of Deliberately Striking Cyclist

Manhattan DA Cy Vance dropped assault charges against Jose Henriquez, the hit-and-run driver accused of intentionally striking a cyclist with an SUV. Henriquez was allowed to plead to leaving the scene and was fined $250. Vance photo: Brad Aaron. Henriquez photo via Facebook
Manhattan DA Cy Vance dropped assault charges against Jose Henriquez, a hit-and-run driver accused of intentionally striking a cyclist with an SUV. Henriquez was allowed to plead to leaving the scene and was fined $250. Vance photo: Brad Aaron. Henriquez photo via Facebook

Manhattan District Attorney Cy Vance dropped assault charges against a hit-and-run driver accused of intentionally ramming a cyclist with an SUV, allowing the defendant to plead guilty to leaving the scene and pay a small fine, according to court documents and the victim’s attorney, Steve Vaccaro.

Vaccaro says the case was one of several handled by his firm, Vaccaro and White, in which Vance’s office declined or otherwise failed to pursue assault charges against motorists and pedestrians who attacked cyclists or purposefully hit them with motor vehicles.

According to Vaccaro and a witness affidavit [PDF], at around 5:00 p.m. on July 13, 2013, Michael (not his actual name) was riding his bike on Avenue B on the Lower East Side. Avenue B is a narrow two-way street with no bike lanes and parking on both sides. To avoid being doored, Michael was riding in the center of his lane. When a motorist approached Michael from behind, tailgating and honking, he responded by flipping the driver off.

Approaching the intersection of Avenue B and E. 13th Street, Michael slowed for a red light. According to the affidavit, the driver, still behind him, accelerated, striking the back of Michael’s bike and flipping him over the handlebars, causing him to hit his head on the ground. With Michael in the street bleeding from his face and head, the motorist swerved around him and attempted to drive off. A second motorist on the opposite side of the intersection tried to block the way, but the SUV driver went around the vehicle and left the scene.

Witnesses noted the SUV’s plate number, and the driver was identified by NYPD as 33-year-old Jose Henriquez, of Queens.

Michael suffered lacerations to his face. Despite his injuries and the circumstances of the crash, NYPD and prosecutors with Vance’s office initially charged Henriquez only with leaving the scene. “We went out and got the witnesses to establish that it was a deliberate strike, and to the DA’s credit, they added assault charges,” says Vaccaro. “Now, inexplicably and without justification, they have dropped them.”

Charges against Henriquez were upgraded to include third degree assault and second degree aggravated harassment. Third degree assault, the top charge, is a class A misdemeanor punishable by up to a year in jail. After months of delays, Henriquez was set to go to trial Tuesday. But on Monday afternoon, the assistant district attorney assigned to the case notified Vaccaro and Michael that, after consulting with her supervisor, Vance’s office offered to allow Henriquez to plead to leaving the scene of an accident with property damage. Henriquez accepted and was sentenced to a fine of $250.

Vaccaro says the ADA was intent on prosecuting the case. He believes the decision to drop the more serious charges apparently came from supervisors within the DA’s office, and reflects a pattern of failing to aggressively prosecute cases of deliberate assaults on bicyclists.

“At least 10 of our firm’s clients in the last four years have been the victims of intentional assaults while bicycling in Manhattan, and of those, in four cases, there were very strong independent eyewitness accounts establishing the intent to assault,” says Vaccaro. “Of those four strong assault cases referred to DA Cy Vance, one resulted in a plea to disorderly conduct, one resulted in a plea of hit-and-run, and two were dismissed for lack of diligent prosecution on ‘speedy trial’ grounds. That prosecutorial record gives cyclists no comfort that aggressive, road-raging drivers will face meaningful consequences for their intentional assaults.”

Vaccaro says it’s troublesome that Vance dropped the assault and harassment charges without consulting the victim, and notified him of the plea after the fact on the eve of trial. But more worrying is what this case and others like it mean for cyclists’ safety on the streets of Manhattan.

“Our city functions on the premise that people can freely operate deadly weapons on our streets — cars — and can be trusted to do so responsibly,” Vaccaro says. “When a motorist commits a deliberate strike, it goes right to the heart of our urban social compact and should be punished as surely and severely as gun violence. When Cy Vance was running for district attorney, he stated repeatedly that he understood the vulnerability of cyclists — invoking the fact that his own son used a bike for transportation in the city — and promised to protect us. He is failing in that promise.”

Streetsblog has a request in with Vance’s office for comment on the Henriquez case. We will update here if we get a statement.

  • Joe R.

    I’m saying that for me personally. Some people get along fine with disabilities, others don’t. Back in 2006 I had a vitamin B12 deficiency for reasons unknown. I had reached the point where I could hardly walk. My feet were swollen and it just hurt. I was walking like I was 90 years old. Thankfully I researched possible causes and hit on B12. After a week of B12 supplements I was fine. However, had this been permanent, I’ve little doubt I would have taken my life eventually. For me physicality is a huge part of enjoying being alive. I understand we all slow down with age. That part I can deal with. I can’t deal with being able to do something well one day, then not at all the next. If it’s something unimportant to me, then it doesn’t matter. However, I couldn’t imagine being dependent upon others for basic needs. That’s the point at which I make a voluntary decision to get off this world-if the disability isn’t temporary, and isn’t getting better. Others might cope just fine. That’s really all I was saying. Obviously you recovered from your TBI just fine. To be sure, I wouldn’t make any decision to take my own life quickly, but once I consulted enough experts and found the situation was hopeless, I would make preparations to go. Anyway, I just mean what I said as it applies to me. Given a choice of dying, versus sustaining a severely disabling injury which would render me physically and/or mentally unable to function close to the level I can now with no hope of recovery, I’d choose the former. I can certainly deal with long periods of temporary disability on the road to recovery, but nothing permanent.

    As for long term solutions, we may one day be able to fix anything but I’d have to have some reasonable hope of that happening in my lifetime to want to remain alive with a severe disability while waiting for it. I personally feel there’s a 50/50 chance we may cure, even reverse aging within my lifetime. That would be a boon for everyone. If we can fix old bodies, I’ve little doubt we would be able to fix virtually any injury. Longer term we may even move our consciousness into artificial bodies which our indistinguishable from real ones, but which function indefinitely. I certainly feel within the next few decades there will be radical advances. I also hope there will be similar advances in preventing causes of injury or death in the first place. Far too many people die well before their time of things which are or should be easily preventable.

    Don’t really need a will. I have no children or others who are dependent upon me. I’ve already set up my assets in trust for my siblings.

  • Gil Lopez

    This is nonsense. Is there a way for someone to get in touch with the DAs office and voice concern/outrage about this?

  • DrS

    Is there a way we can just put this driver’s name and address up publicly and encourage vigilante justice?
    If the “justice” system thinks that it can not punish people for violence, somebody else will have to do it.

  • Ian Turner

    Your risk of a head injury while walking down the sidewalk is actually the same on a per-mile basis (and more on a per-hour basis) compared to cycling. So maybe you should wear that helmet, if you think cycling is so dangerous.

  • “…bleeding from his face.”

    I assume you mean a full face, DOT-tested crash helmet, right? Those styrofoam cups they sell in bike shops are practically worthless in a collision with a car/truck/bus/SUV/etc. and of course usually do nothing to protect the face either.

  • Tyson White
  • Mike Hunt

    Is this still a thing?

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

Is Manhattan DA Cy Vance Delivering on Traffic Justice?

|
The 2009 race for Manhattan district attorney presented a rare opportunity for proponents of safer streets. After decades of indifference toward victims of vehicular violence from Robert Morgenthau, advocates succeeded in making traffic justice a prominent campaign issue for his would-be successors. Contenders for the office pledged to take definitive action to reduce the carnage […]

Cy Vance Files Felony Charges for Beekman Street Sidewalk Hit-and-Run

|
Manhattan District Attorney Cy Vance has filed felony charges against a woman accused of driving onto a downtown sidewalk, striking a pedestrian, and leaving the scene. Heather Hensl was walking on Beekman Street near William Street on April 13 when a motorist struck her, knocking her to the ground, lacerating her head and fracturing her leg. The driver […]

Cy Vance: $580 Fine for Driver Who Killed 9-Year-Old Cooper Stock

|
In separate stories published yesterday, family members of Marilyn Dershowitz and Cooper Stock, both lost to traffic violence, criticized Manhattan District Attorney Cy Vance for his reluctance to file serious charges against motorists who kill people. Vance declined to apply criminal charges against Koffi Komlani, the cab driver who struck 9-year-old Cooper and his father as the two walked hand […]

Charges Reduced in Manhattan Hit-and-Run Death of Charity Hicks

|
Charges have been reduced against a driver who allegedly killed a woman on a Manhattan sidewalk and fled the scene. On May 31, 2014, Thomas Shanley drove a Dodge SUV onto the curb on 10th Avenue near W. 34th Street, striking a pole that fell on Charity Hicks, according to a criminal court complaint and Gothamist. Hicks, […]