City Council: Drivers With Free On-Street Parking Have Suffered Enough

It may be the Vision Zero era, but some things never change. If you’re looking for cost-free, consequence-free storage of your private automobile in public space, the City Council still has your back.

The bill under consideration today by the City Council’s transportation committee, to nibble away at alternate side parking restrictions, may not be as egregious as previous council ideas like free time at unpaid meters or changing city law to mandate parking permits for teachers. But it did offer an opportunity for council members to inveigh on behalf of put-upon “real New Yorkers” who store their cars on the street for free.

Although the average car owner in New York City has a much higher income than a car-free counterpart, that didn’t stop council members from constantly referring to parking tickets as a tax on the middle and working class.

“It’s the anger of real New Yorkers who feel that the city is using them as a piggy bank and that the middle class is being squeezed by unnecessary tickets,” said Council Member Costa Constantinides of Astoria, who signed on to the legislation after seeing illegally-parked drivers on a swept street get tickets before the parking restriction ended. “It felt as if it was just for revenue,” he said.

The bill would allow drivers to park during prohibited hours so long as they are “in the vehicle and ready to move” when the street sweeper comes through. “We should not be going after the working class or middle class,” said Transportation Committee Chair Ydanis Rodriguez, who has pushed the legislation for years. “[It’s] a struggle New Yorkers are all too familiar with.”

The city’s sanitation and police departments testified today in opposition to the bill. “The signs are put up there for a reason,” said NYPD Inspector Dennis Fulton. “The streets need to be cleaned.”

In recent years, the city has already cut the no-parking hours for street sweeping, from three hours to 90 minutes in residential areas, and from one hour to 30 minutes during early-morning hours on commercial streets. In its testimony [PDF], DSNY said the bill would encourage drivers to park before the sweeper comes through if a street sweeper needs to come by twice to finish the job, as can be the case during autumn after leaves have fallen.

Currently, street sweepers are not outfitted with tracking devices and operators communicate using two-way radios. Rodriguez said DSNY should outfit each vehicle with GPS to notify drivers once the street has been cleaned, as it does with snow plows, but department representatives said they weren’t certain their tracking systems could provide the up-to-the-minute accuracy the bill would demand.

While Rodriguez was interested in adding GPS to the street sweepers, there was no discussion at today’s hearing of adding cameras to the vehicles, as is done in Washington, DC [PDF], so that illegally parked drivers can be automatically fined as a street sweeper moves around a car.

Also not up for discussion: Why the city gives away free on-street parking in the first place, and the negative consequences of the status quo free-for-all.

Today’s parking kvetch-fest contrasted with the other bill under consideration, which would require businesses with 20 or more employees to offer pre-tax transit benefits. Modeled on a similar measure in San Francisco, the bill would benefit 605,000 of the 1 million NYC workers who are eligible for the program but are denied access by their employers. Each worker could save $443 annually by using pre-tax dollars to pay for a monthly MetroCard, according to advocacy group Riders Alliance.

Unlike easier free parking, this bill would provide real benefits to working class New Yorkers. “It’s an issue of equity and social justice,” said Council Member I. Daneek Miller, who noted that many large employers offer the benefit to higher-income employees who use the benefit for LIRR or Metro-North fares.

The bill was opposed by representatives of the New York City Hospitality Alliance and the Food Industry Alliance of New York State. “This is just another example of a small business mandate,” said Andrew Rigie of the Hospitality Alliance. He suggested the bill be changed to include only companies with 100 or more workers because, he said, it is too difficult for moderately-sized businesses to offer the program.

But testimony from bill supporters, including Riders Alliance members who themselves work at organizations with fewer than 20 employees, said their employers didn’t have any difficulty providing the benefit once they were made aware of it.

The city’s Department of Finance supported the bill’s goals, but objected to being put in charge of ensuring compliance, saying that it exceeded its authority under the City Charter and the department does not have the expertise necessary to administer the program. Bill sponsor Dan Garodnick said he would be open to changes to the bill.

The committee didn’t vote on either bill today. Riders Alliance is hosting a strategy session on the transit benefit bill tomorrow at 6:30 p.m.

  • lop

    >The bill would allow drivers to park during prohibited hours so long as they are “in the vehicle and ready to move” when the street sweeper comes through.

    The signs say no parking, not no standing. Is this not already allowed? What does ‘ready to move’ mean? Does the car have to be on? Will this just encourage more idling? Will NYPD enforce restrictions against that?

  • iSkyscraper

    It’s important to note that some parts of the city now have once a week sweeping, which basically makes parking on the street, even with a fine, a lot cheaper than parking in a lot or garage — $45 for 13 days of parking, maybe 20 if you time it right and hit a holiday? Can’t beat that deal.

    I’m not sure what Rodriguez’ motivation s. He represents an area that is only 25% car owners, and many of those are not located in his power base in eastern Inwood. Is he really trying for votes on this? I’m not sure it would make sense. He has a pretty sensitive ear for business interests though, and I wonder if local business owners and livery car companies are pushing him for the relief from the sweepers. The odd thing is that his district is also one of the most littered, and you would think he would be out there advocating for more sweeping and less obstructionist parking. Something doesn’t add up.

  • Joe

    Outrageous. The city is already losing hundreds of millions, if not billions of dollars every year on the massive motorized vehicle storage subsidy provided to private car owners. Now we’re expected to cater to their desire to make their free perk on the taxpayers dime even more convenient for them?

  • MattyCiii

    I like the America my parents grew up in. You know, the one without all the whiners.

  • Real New Yorker

    Thanks for standing up for the “real New Yorkers” CM Constantinides. Love that term.

  • Larry Littlefield

    EB White had a different idea of who the “real New Yorkers” are.

    In Here is New York, he noted there are three New Yorks.

    The New York of those who just happened to be born here. Many of them drive.

    The New York of the commuter. If they don’t drive they probably wish they could.

    “Third, there is the New York of the person who was born somewhere else and came to New York in quest of something. Of these three trembling cities the greatest is the last– the city of final destination, the city that is a goal.”

    Of those folks from elsewhere wanted to drive, they’d have gone elsewhere.

  • Tyler

    This does mean it’s already allowed… but why wouldn’t we want to pander to a tiny group of voters that are paying attention to this silliness.

  • Anon

    The people with cars on the street should each spend ten minutes twice a week to clean the street that they park on. Then we wouldn’t need street cleaning paid by city taxes. The people using the resource would pay by keeping the street clean for everyone else.

  • BBnet3000

    Im ok with this as long as we can start actually going after the double parkers.

  • StepUpAndSaySomething

    Doesn’t the council have better things to worry about then some whining rich people that want more free parking handouts?

  • olen

    I am an avid cyclist and I have a car that I park on OUR streets. Deal with it. I use my bike more than my car. I am not rich and the ’95 Camry is a luxury that I share with friends who need to ferry shit around. The city cleans the streets we drive AND cycle on. Cars are not going away in your lifetime. This parking change would let drivers repark their cars after the machine has passed, instead of driving around endlessly looking for a spot and hitting you on your bicycle, or sitting and idling with the AC or heat on for an hour and a half three times a week. This bill does not help me – it helps everyone.

  • qrt145

    It’s your car, so why don’t YOU deal with it?

  • olen

    deal with what?

  • Bolwerk

    To be fair, many parking tickets are a tax on the middle and working classes, just not in the way councilcretins think. They think delivery vehicles are a nuisance getting in the way of their free parking, so they don’t make any accommodations for that necessary service. The high costs of delivering goods in this city is therefore passed onto those of us who don’t drive.

  • Bolwerk

    This actually leads to a rather ironic situation where the people who are most likely to drive are the ones who were paid to stay in NYC through subsidized housing or some other perk that offers free parking for them. They tend to live in “middle class” bubbles and have nothing but contempt for everyone else. Very much like some of the more egregious unions, they jealously guard their perks.

    Naturally, they tend to be some of the last vestiges of the authoritarian junta that propelled Giuliani to power.

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

Rodriguez on Car Free NYC: Climate Change Is a Call to Action on Transit

|
This Friday is Earth Day, and to mark the occasion, City Council Transportation Chair Ydanis Rodriguez is spearheading the “Car Free NYC” initiative. The idea is to raise awareness of the connections between climate change, vehicle emissions, and access to transit. More than three dozen large employers have signed on to encourage their workers to walk, bike, or ride […]

City Council Hard at Work on Pro-Parking Bills

|
Maria Baez wants all teachers to hit the road. Transit-riding New Yorkers, take heart. In these tough times, your City Council members are at this moment pushing a slew of bills that will make your lives easier. All you have to do is trade your MetroCard for a set of car keys. In December and […]

Quinn’s Top Transpo Priority in 2011: Convenience For Car Owners

|
In her State of the City address this afternoon, City Council Speaker Christine Quinn laid out her priorities for the year ahead. Her speech focused on four issue areas: balancing the city budget, creating jobs, preserving affordable housing and parking. Quinn’s parking platform isn’t aimed at making parking cheaper or more plentiful — though she’s […]

Q Poll: Chris Quinn’s Parking Agenda Out of Touch With New Yorkers

|
To hear Christine Quinn tell it, New Yorkers are crying out for relief from unjust parking policies. Over the last two years, it seems that when City Council members weren’t flogging legislation to add layers of bureaucracy to DOT’s street safety program, they were tripping over themselves to absolve motorists of one responsibility after another. […]