Will the New York DMV Keep an Unlicensed Killer on the Road?

When a driver in New York loses his license, it’s up to the state Department of Motor Vehicles to decide when, or if, he gets it back. Based on a recent hearing attended by Streetsblog, the DMV adjudication process at times relies primarily on testimony from drivers involved in fatal crashes, rather than police reports or other evidence.

The New York State DMV may put the man who killed Clara Heyworth while driving without a license back behind the wheel. Photo via ##http://www.nytimes.com/2012/06/11/nyregion/police-unit-draws-scrutiny-for-its-handling-of-crashes-involving-pedestrians.html?smid=tw-nytmetro&seid=auto##New York Times##

Anthony Webb hit Clara Heyworth with a Honda Accord in the early morning hours of July 10, 2011, as she crossed Vanderbilt Avenue near Dekalb Avenue to meet her husband, Jacob Stevens. Heyworth, 28, died the next day. Webb, 43, was charged with driving while intoxicated, operation of a motor vehicle by an unlicensed driver, reckless driving, reckless endangerment, and assault, among other violations. But after NYPD bungled its investigation of the crash, all charges were dropped except unlicensed driving and driving without an insurance card, to which Webb pled guilty.

On January 28, Webb appeared before administrative law judge Marc Berger for a hearing to, according to the DMV notice, “determine whether or not any registrations, license and/or driving privileges should be suspended or revoked.” In a cramped, windowless room in a building in the Financial District, Webb sat across a conference table from Stevens and his attorney, Steve Vaccaro. (Disclosure: Vaccaro’s law firm is a Streetsblog sponsor.)

Berger set the tone right away. Having only a seven-page police report to work from — an NYPD witness failed to show — Berger did not know where the crash had occurred. When Stevens, who saw it happen, began to tell him the location, Berger snapped at Vaccaro, “He’s not to say anything. You’re strictly observers, both of you, unless I allow you to ask questions.” Minutes later, as Vaccaro looked at his notes, Berger said: “Please stop shuffling papers. Don’t touch another paper. Put it in your lap or whatever you have to do.”

By contrast, Berger’s attitude toward Webb was, for the most part, casual, if not cordial. More important, Berger looked to Webb to fill in the gaps in the NYPD report.

Berger asked Webb for a forensic analysis of the crash and the crash scene — how fast Webb was driving, the presence of street lights, whether cars were parked on the street, which direction Heyworth was walking, where she landed after the collision, and how the car was damaged.

When Webb hesitated, or struggled to answer, Berger asked leading questions, or filled in the answers himself: “What did you do when you heard the thump, if anything? Brake?”

Though Webb told Berger that Heyworth was crossing from his right, according to Stevens she was crossing from his left. But Webb had the final say on how the crash occurred. After Webb gave his version of events, Berger said, “Okay, that’s fine. That makes sense. I just need answers, and it doesn’t, you know, I’m not looking to trip you up.”

Berger even relied on Webb to tell him if he had been drinking. When a breath test was administered an hour after the crash, it indicated Webb had a blood alcohol content of .07, according a lawsuit filed by Stevens against NYPD. Prosecutors working for former Brooklyn District Attorney Charles Hynes dropped the drunk driving charge against Webb because the 88th Precinct had not calibrated the breath test machine for four years. The machine was later found to be working properly, and prosecutors were publicly admonished by a judge for not pursuing the charge.

Webb told Berger, however, that he was found not guilty of drunk driving, and that he had consumed no alcohol before the crash. This detail was accepted at face value until Vaccaro was permitted to ask questions toward the end of the hearing.

Vaccaro: “Is it true that Mr. Webb was never tried on the DWI charges?”

Berger: “Can you tell me what you mean by that?”

Vaccaro: “Well, earlier there was a statement that he was found not guilty, I believe. But in fact the charges were dropped. So there was not a trial and then an acquittal. I think that’s relevant, as opposed to the charges never being pursued.”

Berger: “Assuming that’s correct, why was that the case? Do you know?”

Vaccaro: “I do know.”

Berger: “You can tell me.”

Vaccaro: “Because there was a technical flaw in the scheduling of the calibration of the Breathalyzer machine that was used to test Mr. Webb that showed that he had a .07 blood alcohol content at the scene of the crash.”

Berger: “So was that reportedly an error, or correct, the .07?”

Vaccaro: “It was determined that the .07 was correct. However, because of the technical flaw in the calibration schedule of the machine it was not admissible in the context of a criminal proceeding.”

Berger: “Okay. [addresses Webb] Does that sound right to you?”

Webb: “No.” [gestures with hands]

Berger: “I need something verbal because we’re on tape. So whether you agree with it or not you can’t just move your hands. You have to say something.”

Webb: “I don’t agree with it. You know, far as all that, I got to have my lawyer here for all of that.”

Berger: “Okay so let’s move forward. I’m not going to adjourn the case for him to get a lawyer for that question that I’m not really, even though, I mean I, yeah.”

Vaccaro: “Is it true that Mr. Webb refused to take a second Breathalyzer test the night that he was arrested following this crash?”

Berger: [voice rising] “I can’t take any kind of action regarding any kind of DWI. That’s for the criminal court. So I’m not going to allow a whole string of questions about that. What else?”

The New York State DMV has no hard guidelines concerning when a motorist’s license is subject to a hearing. Vaccaro, who specializes in representing traffic crash victims and their families, told Streetsblog the agency takes action in most, but not all, fatality cases. “I’ve never heard of it being done in a non-fatality case,” Vaccaro said, “but it might happen.”

In this case, Webb admitted in court that he was driving in violation of his learners permit when he killed Clara Heyworth. Based on the information provided at the hearing, he has never held a valid drivers license, yet he has offenses on his record dating to the 1990s. Despite the fact that Webb killed someone while driving illegally, the DMV hearing may well result in his learners permit being restored, again clearing the path for him to obtain a full license.

The absurdity of this scenario — and, apparently, the process by which the DMV decides who may drive in New York State — was crystallized in one exchange. As the hearing drew to a close, Berger told Webb that if he didn’t file a particular form, his license would be suspended. Then he caught himself. “If you don’t have a license there’s no license to suspend,” Berger said. “But you know, it would actually suspend your permit.” Webb’s permit, of course, was already suspended.

About that form: Webb was supposed file it within 10 days of the crash. When Webb told Berger he had no knowledge of the form, Berger said, “Almost nobody knows about it.” Berger first told Webb he would have to complete the form and return it before leaving the building. But when Webb asked if he could return it later instead, Berger said, “Okay, so take it with you.”

Despite Webb’s history of unlicensed driving, it was Vaccaro, not Berger, who asked if he has driven a car since July 2011.

Vaccaro: “Has Mr. Webb operated a motor vehicle since the crash?”

Berger: “Interesting. [addresses Webb] Um, have you?”

Webb: “I don’t have [unintelligible]. I don’t know. I don’t have no car.”

Berger: “Answer me.”

Webb: “No.”

Berger: “All right.”

You read correctly: Webb actually said he did not know if he had driven a car since the crash, then changed his answer to “No.” This response was sufficient for Berger to move on. A moment later, he adjourned the half-hour hearing.

“You’ll get a decision in the mail,” Berger said.

  • Kevin Love

    Meanwhile, in countries that actually care about human life, judges have a habit of denying bail to unlicensed drunk drivers who kill. The judges (surprise, surprise!) seem to be of the opinion that they cannot be trusted to obey bail terms forbidding them from driving.

    For an example, see:

    http://www.saultstar.com/2013/09/10/suspect-in-fatality-denied-bail

  • qrt145

    I find it disturbing that a judge doesn’t care that he is obviously been lied to.

  • Mark Walker

    Who judges the judges? Whatever oversight is built into this process, it clearly isn’t working. Thanks to Steve and Streetsblog for shining a light. It would be great if the mainstream media (say, Greg Mocker or Arthur Chi’en of PIX11) picked up the story. This needs to be part of the Vision Zero conversation.

  • Jonathan R

    Administrative law judges aren’t judicial appointees, so expectations should be low for the “justice” they provide, but this is incredible.

    On the other hand, since they aren’t judicial appointees, it should be easy to transfer them to other positions in DMV where their lack of attention to detail and facts can’t cause any harm.

  • Albert

    If a trial can be declared a mistrial, can this hearing be declared a mis-hearing?

  • Eric McClure

    This is so wrong. I feel awful for Jake Stevens. Webb should behind bars, not a steering wheel.

  • Alex

    Christ, if that was my wife that was killed and the judge snapped at me that way, I would have lost my shit at him. It would have been worth being found in contempt. What a despicable joke.

  • Andrew

    How does Marc Berger travel to work? If he drives, does he have special parking privileges unavailable to the general public?

  • mike

    No one mentions that she was drunk. Was running away from him crossing midblock after an argument and possibly being assaulted. Now he us the grieving husband. $ signs.

  • Cold Shoaler

    Right, they were both drunk = level playing field. Interesting that the pedestrian’s drinking is relevant while the driver’s is in admissible. Oh, and ‘jaywalker’ + ‘wifebeater’ = “Now he us… $” Thanks, Mike.

  • sammy davis jr jr

    Very disturbing.

    Thank you for sharing and informing.

  • mik

    Nice blog. You guys delete the post with the truth. The women killed was intoxicated also. Was hit by the car fleeing from her husband after being smacked around and was in the middle of the block running in between two parked cars.

  • Kevin Love

    So what? It could have been a child chasing a ball. Dead is dead.

    An unlicensed drunken car driver was driving with such an extreme state of criminal negligence that he killed a woman.

    In countries that actually care about human life, this violent, dangerous criminal would have been denied bail and held in jail until his trial. Upon being found guilty, he would have stayed in jail for a long, long time.

  • Gene_nyc

    It seems like the judges run it this way on purpose to keep the flow of cases coming to them and justify their spots. Just thinking, as most useless positions in corporations run things the exact same way. If the law actually worked in a just manner, these jokers would have no job left.

  • SantaRosaNavySeal

    The husband was not present. He snapped at Vaccaro the laywer representing the crash victim.

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

Families for Safe Streets Meets With Cuomo Rep to Talk DMV Reforms

|
In a meeting with representatives from Governor Andrew Cuomo’s administration Tuesday, members of Families for Safe Streets called for reforms to New York State Department of Motor Vehicles protocols, with the goal of discouraging reckless driving and obtaining some measure of justice for crash victims and their families. Karen Rae, Cuomo’s deputy transportation secretary, met with relatives […]