MTA Planning Chief: NYC’s Next Mayor Needs to Stick Up for Bus Lanes

Until the city commits to dedicating more street space for buses, riders like those on 125th Street will be stuck with slow rides. Photo: ##http://instagram.com/p/cfGglNKvF8/##Benjamin Engle##

After a presentation on regional transit ridership trends at NYU’s Rudin Center this morning, William Wheeler, the MTA’s planning director, said the city’s next mayor needs to firmly support the reallocation of street space for dedicated bus lanes, and should not back down in the face of opposition to changes that take away real estate from cars.

The biggest problem afflicting the city’s bus system right now is simple and widely acknowledged: Buses are just too slow. “In the end, how fast can you get those buses across streets?” Wheeler asked. “If you can make it quickly, you’re going to attract people. And that’s the biggest struggle with the bus system.”

He cited Select Bus Service and transit signal priority, which keeps buses from sitting at red lights, as steps in the right direction, but added that there’s still more to do. “There’s always a constant struggle to keep vehicles out of devoted lanes,” he said.

The MTA has a wide-ranging plan for future phases of Select Bus Service, and mayoral candidates have spoken highly of Bus Rapid Transit, but reallocating street space for dedicated busways is easier said than done. Even a bus lane for 125th Street set aside with paint and enforcement cameras, not physical separation, drew enough political opposition to get NYC DOT and the MTA to shelve their SBS plan this summer.

After the event, I asked Wheeler how the MTA deals with that type of pushback, and whether he was keeping tabs on Chicago or other cities that are proposing big street design changes to speed up buses.

“You gotta watch the mayoral race,” he said. “The candidates, are they willing to continue this trend of looking at a street and having it not just be a resource for motor vehicles?” He said the next mayor must not only resist calls to roll back existing advances, but also add more bus lanes and other street reallocations. “It’s hard,” he said. “The only thing more important than owning a gun in the United States is having a parking spot.”

Most of the presentation, which Wheeler also gave to the MTA board’s finance committee in July [PDF], covered a well-worn topic: the MTA’s shifting ridership patterns, led by millennials and aging baby boomers who are working nontraditional hours, reducing car usage, traveling more between boroughs and suburbs, and increasingly making reverse-peak, off-peak, and weekend trips on transit.

Expressing frustration about the interminable planning and construction timelines for big projects, Wheeler focused on buses and smaller fixes to squeeze more capacity out of the existing system, instead of addressing the causes of high costs and long project delays. He emphasized the need to upgrade subway signals to Communication-Based Train Control and spoke highly of through-running trains with New Jersey Transit, despite logistical hurdles, to increase capacity at Penn Station.

At a time when New York City is expanding its ferry subsidies, Wheeler questioned whether ferries improve travel times and “provide serious capacity at a reasonable cost.” He said they “work best in niche markets” such as cross-Hudson routes from Haverstraw and Newburgh to Metro-North service.

Wheeler warned that the MTA faces long-term funding challenges. “This capital program period that we’re entering,” he said, referring to the agency’s maintenance and expansion plan from 2015 to 2019, “is probably the one where we’re able to identify the fewest amount of resources to meet the capital needs.”

An audience member suggested congestion pricing as a potential revenue source. “It’s very healthy to continue the debate,” Wheeler said, cautioning that any new revenue can be used to offset contributions elsewhere. “As new revenue sources are put on the table, there’s lots of hungry mouths to share in that,” he said. “You have to watch out… that your existing resources don’t fade away.”

  • Larry Littlefield

    I’ve set it before. Convert the Metropolitan Transportation Authority to the Metropolitan Railroad Authority.

    Turn buses, and paratransit, over to New York City and the suburban counties, along with the payroll tax revenues, which the suburbs hate, collected within each jurisdiction. And use all the other state aid for transit for the subway and rail capital plan, not to subsidize the buses.

    Grandstanding suburban politicians would face a choice — keep the payroll tax revenues and have a bus system, or give them and not have a bus system.

    The city would have to come up with, net of the payroll tax revenues from within NYC and its existing contribution to MTA Bus, $800 million to subsidize buses and paratransit — unless it found efficiencies to reduce this. This subsidy costs would be freed from the MTA to invest in rail.

    And city politicians who control street configurations would also be responsible for the quality of the bus system. Now they can demand better bus service while not making it possible. Let those who control the right of way be responsible for the service.

  • Jeff

    “The only thing more important than owning a gun in the United States is having a parking spot.”

    Love it.

  • Jesse

    Aside from the technical problem of having bus stops in medians in the middle of the street, what´s wrong with putting the BRT lane there? One of the big problems with bus lanes is that they get stuck in the traffic of turning cars.

  • Bolwerk

    Nothing. That’s what they should do, but it does tend to require more traffic calming than NYC planners are willing to demand.

  • Bolwerk

    I’m not sure encouraging more regional transport atomization is a good idea. If everyone thinks of it all as one system, it doesn’t much matter that the subway side is subsidizing the surface side or whatever (and it doesn’t, because they contribute to each other).

    If we need a top-down solution, it should just be mandating best practice and efficiency across the transit system. If you board a bus in Riverdale and want to go to Flushing, it really shouldn’t matter an iota if you emerge by 7 Train or LIRR. There is probably no way to avoid some subsidization, but you can have a situation where more than 70% of the costs are borne by the riders. Surely the omnipotent accountants can figure out a way!

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

Slow-Moving Bus Rapid Transit

|
The Oil Drum has coverage of last night’s bus rapid transit forum on the Upper East Side: Despite the broad-based community support for faster, more efficient and higher quality bus services all that is being discussed by city/state/MTA officials is a STUDY that will examine 15 routes to pick JUST 5 in June 2007 and […]

What’s Next for Select Bus Service in New York?

|
Last night, Streetsblog and the New York Transit Museum hosted a discussion on the future of Bus Rapid Transit in New York. Mayor de Blasio has pledged to implement “world-class” BRT, and DOT Commissioner Polly Trottenberg has promised a stepped-up timetable for expansion of Select Bus Service, New York’s brand of enhanced bus. But what will […]

Live-Blogging the Manhattan Transpo Policy Conference

|
I’m up at Columbia University covering Borough President Stringer’s Transportation Policy Conference, live: 10:40 am: Enrique Peñalosa, the former mayor of Bogotá, Colombia is the keynote speaker. In only one three-year term as Mayor, Penalosa revolutionized the transportation system and public spaces of his city of 7 million (Mayors only get one term in office […]