Feds Reject Loan Application for Cuomo’s Transit-less Tappan Zee Bridge

In a major rebuke to the Cuomo administration’s plans for a transit-less Tappan Zee Bridge, the federal government rejected New York State’s application for a low-interest federal loan yesterday. The loan, which would have been made under the popular TIFIA program, was an important component of Cuomo’s plans to finance the new Tappan Zee.

The longer you examine Andrew Cuomo's plan for a Tappan Zee Bridge without transit, the worse it looks. Photo: ##http://www.newsday.com/opinion/keep-up-tappan-zee-pressure-1.3243937##Angel Franco/Newsday##

Demand for TIFIA loans was high; 26 letters of interest were submitted requesting a total of $13 billion, far more than was available. Excluding a pie-in-the-sky submission for a “pod train superhighway,” New York’s application for $2 billion to help build the new Tappan Zee Bridge was the largest request.

Even so, many expected the project to get a nod from the feds. After all, the Tappan Zee was one of only 14 infrastructure projects nationwide to be chosen for expedited review by the Obama administration, a sign of special favor.

Instead, five projects were invited to move forward in the TIFIA application process. Notably, some of the projects chosen include bus rapid transit components, as in Colorado’s US 36 project, or joint carpool/toll lanes, as in Northern Virginia’s I-95 project. In contrast, the Tappan Zee replacement project would double the width of the existing bridge and open all that space to single occupancy vehicles.

New York could reapply for next year’s round of TIFIA loans, said U.S. DOT spokesperson Bill Adams, but won’t receive any this year. Without credit assistance from the feds, financing the Tappan Zee Bridge gets that much more difficult. TIFIA loans currently offer a 3.15 percent interest rate. Thruway Authority loans, according to analyst Charles Komanoff, average about 4.5 percent. On a $2 billion loan, that’s a sizable increase in the price tag for the project.

The difference would likely have to come from higher tolls, either for drivers crossing the Tappan Zee or for those on the rest of the Thruway system. According to Komanoff’s calculations, the difference in toll prices without the low-interest loan will be sizable. In the best-case scenario — one without any cost overruns and in which high tolls don’t scare off drivers — the TIFIA rejection will push tolls from $10.90 to $12.30. In a case with higher construction costs than estimated and lower traffic levels than projected, tolls would rise from $18.40 with the TIFIA loan to $20.50 without.

The Thruway Authority did not respond to a Streetsblog inquiry about how the loan rejection will affect its plans to finance the new bridge.

Why was the Tappan Zee’s application rejected? Adams wouldn’t say, except to note that there was more demand for projects than dollars to distribute.

But maybe it’s the fact that local leaders, including the county executives, state senators and mayors on both sides of the bridge, have been loudly demanding the restoration of transit. Maybe it’s because without that transit, the Tappan Zee does nothing to meet the state and nation’s sustainability goals, which are a major selection criteria in the TIFIA process. Maybe it’s because the state’s misleading and inadequate environmental impact statement leaves the Tappan Zee project open to lawsuits. Maybe it’s because the Cuomo administration still hasn’t told anyone how they plan to pay for the rest of the bridge, and the total price tag of the project changes based on who’s asking.

Whatever the reason, it looks like the number of people asking questions about the Cuomo plan for the Tappan Zee just keeps growing.

  • I would have preferred the feds had clarified the cause for their lack of interest and to what degree it was about the lack of mass transit options, so that there was no ambiguity about the failure.  It would have been grist for the re-submission next year.

  • Larry Littlefield

    I agree with the inspector.  Assuming the program even continues, the state should come back with flying junction overpasses to Route 119 and Route 59/9W, and the “breakdown lanes” as bus only lanes.  And say it is the start of what could be a BRT network.

    They could also lose a moving lane or two, because unless they are going to have more than four general moving lanes on each side of the bridge, more lanes won’t help anyway. 

  • Trillbet

    It was denied because it wasn’t 30 lanes across.

  • Anonymous

    If Cuomo is right and the Bridge is in jeopardy of falling down, he should take emergency measures as can-do governor to replace 25% of vehicles with a dedicated bus lane.  Divert all trucks to the bridges to the north, as freight trains are diverted now.  And setup an interim BRT system with “stations” along I-87 in Rockland and Westcheste right now.

  • It is actually better to have no new bridge than a new bridge without a rail line. Hopefully it won’t fall down before Cuomo can be replaced. 

  • Nathanael

    The Tappan Zee bridge is in no danger of falling down.  It’s just “functionally obsolete”, meaning it’s an old design and ought to have fewer lanes than it does now.

    This is a terrible place to put a bridge (the widest point on the Hudson?) and we don’t want more expressway lanes anyway.  On the other hand, we could sure use a rail crossing of the Hudson south of Selkirk.

    Ugh.  I have no respect left for Andrew “frack upstate” Cuomo.  This is making me lose respect for Gillibrand and Schumer, who are still pushing for the feds to fund this badly-designed road warrior’s dream.

  • Loan to be the best in order when experience an urgent situation financial lack. For instance: hospital expenses, power expenses, bank card debt, institution charges, arranging of journey passes, and like sensible are some of the uses you can consider the money. So, you need not have to search for for money any longer rather take away it by implementing it for same day financial loans.
     

  • Consolidating your debt can give you an probability to lastly start paying down your account balances. A lower attention rate will allow you to spend less on attention and more on the major stability. Placing more money toward your monthly stability will allow you to pay less attention as your stability decreases.

  • Hari Prasad

    My loan was rejected. Credit
    Sudhaar was my choice. Initially they were slow. But their counsellors were
    able to handle all my queries. I will give Credit Sudhaar a positive review

  • Kabir Khan

    My loan was rejected. Credit
    Sudhaar was my choice. Initially they were slow. But their counsellors were
    able to handle all my queries. I will give Credit Sudhaar a positive review

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

Focused on Climate Change, Will Cuomo Reconsider the Transit-Less TZB?

|
In August, three county executives supported Governor Cuomo’s Tappan Zee Bridge plan in exchange for a “transit task force” that would study how to strengthen transit between Rockland and Westchester counties. At the time, advocates greeted the announcement with cautious optimism, awaiting details on the task force from the governor. They’re still waiting. “It’s been […]

Does Cuomo’s Budget Include Tappan Zee Subsidies?

|
Governor Cuomo’s state budget proposal includes hundreds of millions of dollars in discretionary spending for what one administration official has called “transformational projects.” It’s not clear what the loosely-defined pot of money will be used for, but so far the rhetoric indicates that Cuomo’s wide, transit-less, double-span Tappan Zee replacement bridge could be one recipient. This […]