City Council Votes to Increase Oversight of Bike Lane Removal

Yesterday the City Council passed Lew Fidler’s Intro 412 — the bill mandating community board notification about the installation of bike lanes — setting the stage for some showboating from Fidler, Speaker Christine Quinn and Transportation Committee Chair James Vacca.

Little-known fact: Lew Fidler's bill also requires the city to notify community boards before a bike lane is removed. Photo of Bedford Avenue bike lane erasure: Elizabeth Press

“Our legislation will ensure the Department of Transportation works with community boards and fully considers feedback from neighborhood residents on where, and how, bicycle lanes are installed,” Quinn said in a statement.

This is kind of like bragging about legislation that ensures the Department of Sanitation will pick up the trash. The city already brings bike lane proposals to community boards. The past few years have produced a long record of community board votes in favor of safer streets, as well as a few that went in favor of the status quo. With or without this bill, the bike lanes are going in where the community boards sign off on them.

Defending the need for the legislation, Vacca told NY1, “I don’t think it’s anti-bike to make sure that local neighborhoods have input as to where bike lanes go.”

Can’t argue there. Having a public process for bike lane installation is not anti-bike. What’s anti-bike is to imply that the recent expansion of bike lanes has somehow lacked sufficient public input, which is the message that comes across from the coverage of this bill.

It’s also strange that the City Council thinks it’s necessary to mandate notification for all bike lanes, but not for all changes to motor vehicle lanes. If the city wants to carve out some left-turn bays from a pedestrian median, for instance, there’s no law requiring a public hearing.

So yeah, it’s anti-bike to grandstand about the imaginary problem of community input on bike lanes when the council could be focusing on real transportation problems like the MTA debt bomb, obscenely wasteful subsidies for stadium parking, or NYPD’s refusal to disclose information on traffic crashes.

In any case, Quinn, Vacca, and Fidler missed their chance to boast about the real innovation in this bill. It requires the city to inform community boards before any bike lane is removed:

…at least ninety days before the construction or the removal of a bicycle lane is to begin, the department shall notify each affected council member and community board via electronic mail of the proposed plans for the bicycle lane within the affected community district and shall offer to make a presentation at a public hearing held by such affected community board.

From now on, City Hall can’t make political bargains to rip out bike lanes without telling the affected community board and council member first. Whether the local CB and council member act on that information to notify the broader public seems to be up to them. So the bill isn’t quite a failsafe against future surprises like Bedford Avenue and Father Capodanno Boulevard, but it is a step forward.

NYC DOT has not opposed the bill, and the mayor is expected to sign it into law.

  • Eric McClure

    Where’s the bill and when’s the hearing about criminalizing the frequent act of running over a pedestrian or cyclist with one’s car while breaking traffic laws?

  • J

    I read another comment somewhere that said that this law will actually take away the argument that DOT is running roughshod over community concerns. I tend to agree.

  • Glenn

    This is about control, not pro-con on bike lanes. City Councilmembers have so little power and often they feel that City Hall does not keep them in the loop and they look ridiculous to their constituents when they are informed by press release or after the fact.

  • As much as this bill is designed to kick livable streets advocates in the teeth, take comfort in the fact that it probably hurts just as much at Iris Weinshall’s apartment.  As the post points out, it may now be just as hard to remove an existing bike lane as it is to install a new one.  Bye-bye, smoke filled rooms! Hello, barroom meetings and community board hearings!

  • You guys will be amazed how moot this all becomes when Alta Bikeshare arrives in your city. 

  • Way Uptown

    Keep those new lanes coming. Bike share is cool, but it’s on another planet for those of us who bike commute and play in the 90% of the city it doesn’t cover.

  • Daphna

     Thank you to Noah, Ben and Streetsblog.  This article by Ben is such a more comprehensive description of Lew Fidler’s bill than the article in the Observer.  I appreciate the more thorough coverage!

  • Sherman

    Editorial: Lootin’ Lew
    Posted on 2011-06-12 04:00:00
    Certified by the Campaign Finance Board: Brooklyn Councilman Lew Fidler ripped off the taxpayers to the tune of $88,550. Read More

  • Ian Turner

    This remark is not looking so prescient after all…

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

Vacca Watch: Transpo Chair Stokes Fears of Phantom Bike Lanes on NY1

|
To borrow from the Wall Street Journal’s Jason Gay, this NY1 segment starring City Council Transportation Chair James Vacca seems to come straight out of the “shrill and embarrassing” early 2011 phase of NYC bike coverage. Once reporter Michael Herzenberg intones in his best investigative journalist voice that “believe it or not, many of the […]

The NBBL Files: Norman Steisel’s Ideas Became Jimmy Vacca’s Bills

|
Editor’s note: With yesterday’s appellate ruling prolonging the Prospect Park West case, Streetsblog is running a refresher on the how the well-connected gang of bike lane opponents waged their assault against a popular and effective street safety project. This is the fourth installment from the six-part NBBL Files. This piece originally ran on October 11, 2011. This is […]

City Council Singles Out Bike Lanes in Bills to Codify DOT Outreach

|
The City Council Transportation Committee held hearings on three bills today, each of which would add more requirements to the Department of Transportation’s review process for street redesigns, especially bike lanes. For the most part, the bills codify what DOT already does: present bike projects to community boards, coordinate with other agencies before implementation, and […]