Marty Markowitz Chooses the Perfect Moment to Jump Into PPW Lawsuit

How’s this for some impeccable timing? Less than 48 hours before the next scheduled court date in the Prospect Park West case, Brooklyn Borough President Marty Markowitz is inserting himself into the proceedings in an attempt to keep the tenuous suit from being thrown out.

Not on Marty's watch: After fighting for years against a redesign that has brought all-ages cycling to Prospect Park West, the borough president has now directly inserted himself into the legal maneuvering to wipe out the PPW bike lane. Photo: ##http://www.flickr.com/photos/planetgordon/5585952895/in/pool-1690942@N22/##PlanetGordon/Flickr##

Yesterday afternoon LCG Communications, the PR firm representing bike lane opponents, alerted the local press: Markowitz had submitted an affidavit stating that DOT “explicitly described the PPW bike lane as a trial.” (Streetsblog is trying to obtain the actual affidavit; for now we just have the press release [PDF].) Markowitz has been fighting this project for at least two years, and the finality of the redesign has been a central legal issue for months, but only now, apparently, at the eleventh hour, did the borough president’s memory kick in.

For everyone who’s catching up on this story — we are deep in the weeds here. The permanence of the PPW redesign is a legal question with no actual bearing on the success, popularity, or legitimacy of the project. We are talking about an idea that was requested and approved by the local community board. A redesign that has slowed down speeding traffic, reduced crashes causing injury, and increased cycling while reducing sidewalk riding. It enjoys widespread support in the local community, and it’s attracting new riders, including kids who can now safely bike to Prospect Park on their own.

In a legal sense, however, the “trial” issue is important, because the plaintiffs missed their chance to file a lawsuit within the four-month statute of limitations following the permanent installation of a city project. Their case will get tossed unless the judge rules that the PPW redesign was implemented on a temporary basis.

The most pressing question raised by Markowitz’s affidavit is this: Why now? Why, with only hours to go until the next court hearing, did Markowitz come forward to share a recollection from 16 months ago? Given everything we know about Markowitz’s relationships with bike lane opponents and his deep involvement in the campaign to reverse the redesign of Prospect Park West, the sequence of events makes no sense.

Consider:

  • Markowitz’s office came up with the idea of calling the bike lane a “trial” or “pilot” project before meeting with DOT brass on March 1, 2010.
  • Markowitz made multiple TV appearances complaining about the Prospect Park West bike lane in the next year. Not once did he tell a sympathetic reporter like Marcia Kramer that he was told the project was a trial.
  • Markowitz gave an extensive interview to WNYC’s Andrea Bernstein in April, 2010, barely a month after the meeting with DOT staff. At no point in the interview did he say the project is a trial.
  • Markowitz testified at a New York City Council hearing on DOT bike policy last December, appearing with other PPW bike lane opponents. At no point in his testimony [PDF] did he call the project a trial.
  • Markowitz has been in constant contact with bike lane opponents, including former DOT commissioner Iris Weinshall, for nearly two years. He and his office have had prolific email correspondence with Brooklyn College dean Louise Hainline, leader of the anti-bike lane group “Neighbors for Better Bike Lanes,” going back at least to last May. The unsubstantiated contention that the project was a DOT “trial” figures prominently in the plaintiffs’ lawsuit [PDF]. Yet bike lane opponents made no mention of any DOT statements to Markowitz about a “trial” when they filed their complaint. That was four months ago.
  • When the city replied to the plaintiffs’ suit, they made the permanence of the redesign the centerpiece of their legal argument. Because the bike lane had been installed eight months before the plaintiffs filed their lawsuit, the statute of limitations had run out. Marty said nothing at the time. That was more than a month ago.
  • When Jim Walden, the plaintiffs’ lawyer, asked Judge Bert Bunyan to adjourn the case last month, he said he needed more time to review a FOIL disclosure from City Council Member Brad Lander, which would supposedly reveal DOT’s hidden “trial project” agenda. He said nothing about DOT statements to Markowitz.
  • When Walden wrote to the judge asking for another delay, he cited a New York Times story about Bloomberg administration pilot projects, which made no mention of Prospect Park West, as the justification. He said nothing about Markowitz.

Only now is Markowitz coming forward with this recollection of being promised that the PPW redesign would be a trial — a memory that would have served his purposes on several prior occasions. Perfect timing.

  • Anonymous

    And I was naively thinking that committing perjury in an affidavit was illegal or something…

  • NattyB

    Does Streetblogs possess a Foil’ed e-mail where Marty Markowitz’s either:

    (a) admits it’s not a trial; and/or

    (b) calls it a trial but is then corrected?

    I’m moving to Brooklyn so this guy will be my new over lord.  I had originally thought I’d move to South Brooklyn (Park Slope, Boreum Hill, Prospect Heights, Clinton Hill, Fort Greene), but the foot print for the Atlantic Yards was too big to avoid.   So, I ended up getting a yuppified building in williamsburg with a bad ass bike room. 

  • Gibby Dunn

    “Given everything we know about Markowitz’s relationships with bike lane
    opponents and his deep involvement in the campaign to reverse the
    redesign of Prospect Park West, the timing makes no sense.”

    Correction. Given everything we know about Markowitz’ paranoia, dishonesty, and cozy relationship with the NBBLers, the timing makes PERFECT sense.

  • Excellent post Ben!  I hope the city’s lawyer’s are reading (and downloading) in anticipation of tomorrow hearing!

  • Larry Littlefield

    What is the goal?  Delay.  

    Postpone the hearing to consider new evidence.

    New hearing to consider the city’s response.

    Postpone again because pro bono lawyers are busy.Hopefully for 2 1/2 years including appeals.  

    And they a new Mayor can settle out of court with everything sealed, and them claim the courts made them remove the bike lane without being contradicted.  And if anyone gets run over on 8th Avenue, claim that bikes need to be banned in Park Slope because it isn’t safe.

    Anything to avoid the question:  are the procedural impediments to putting in street changes that benefit pedestrians or cyclists drastically different, and more time consuming and expensive, than those that benefit motor vehicles?  And if so, why?

  • Larry Littlefield

    What is the goal?  Delay.  

    Postpone the hearing to consider new evidence.

    New hearing to consider the city’s response.

    Postpone again because pro bono lawyers are busy.Hopefully for 2 1/2 years including appeals.  

    And they a new Mayor can settle out of court with everything sealed, and them claim the courts made them remove the bike lane without being contradicted.  And if anyone gets run over on 8th Avenue, claim that bikes need to be banned in Park Slope because it isn’t safe.

    Anything to avoid the question:  are the procedural impediments to putting in street changes that benefit pedestrians or cyclists drastically different, and more time consuming and expensive, than those that benefit motor vehicles?  And if so, why?

  • Anonymous

    Time for another “Keep It Classy, Marty” headline:
    Markowitz Fined $20,000 for Wife’s Free Overseas Trips
    Two particularly great quotes:

    “I am mayor of Brooklyn, no I am not mayor, I am the borough president,”
    he said, correcting himself.

    And:

    This is the second ethics fine Mr. Markowitz has racked up this year. In February, the board docked him $2,000 for using his chief of staff as his lawyer at a 2009 real estate closing.

    But this is a guy whose memory/honesty the judge should trust.

  • Mark Walker

    What a pity that Markowitz visited the Netherlands without coming away with an appreciation for car-free and car-light street design.

  • Mark Walker

    What a pity that Markowitz visited the Netherlands without coming away with an appreciation for car-free and car-light street design.

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

JSK Counters Markowitz Affidavit; No Decision on PPW Bike Lane Case Today

|
Transportation Commissioner Janette Sadik-Khan has submitted an affidavit countering Brooklyn Borough President Marty Markowitz’s assertion that the Prospect Park West bike lane was installed as a trial. The rest of the news coming from today’s hearing in Brooklyn Supreme Court once again centers on procedural maneuvering. There was no decision on the Prospect Park West […]

Three Myths From Marty About the PPW Bike Lane

|
It’s showtime for the Prospect Park West bike lane, with a bike lane protest and a rally for the redesign coming up tomorrow morning. In a prelude to the big day, Brooklyn Borough President Marty Markowitz is making some rounds in the media. The Brooklyn Paper and NY1 got some choice quotes from the beep, […]

Markowitz on PPW Data: It’s a Vast Biking Conspiracy

|
It’s hard to know what to say after viewing this CBS2/Marcia Kramer segment. Watch Marty Markowitz allege that bike counts on Prospect Park West were inflated because advocates got tipped off by DOT about when the counts would happen, then biked over to use the new lane on those days. Your jaw may drop. Marty […]