Mica Transportation Bill Would Devastate New York Transit

The Senate Democrats predict enormous cuts to transit funding in the New York region if the Republican transportation bill becomes law. Image: ##http://blog.tstc.org/2011/07/08/house-gops-transportation-bill-offers-new-direction-backwards/##Tri-State Transportation Campaign##

Rep. John Mica’s proposed transportation bill would take a machete to federal transportation spending, cutting overall transportation funding by a third and entirely eliminating dedicated funds for pedestrian and bike infrastructure.

In New York, the effects would be especially dire. Statewide, the total cuts would inch up to 37 percent, according to calculations by the Democrat-controlled Senate Banking Committee (thanks to Ya-Ting Liu at the Tri-State Transportation Campaign for compiling these numbers).

While nationwide, Mica would maintain the 80/20 split between highway and transit spending, New York and its neighbors flex some of their highway dollars to support transit. In the tri-state region, cuts to federal “highway” spending translate into cuts to transit spending as well. Under the Mica proposal, federal highway spending in New York would fall by $568 million a year from current levels, while transit spending would be cut by $646 million. Those austerity levels would be locked in for six years.

At a time when the MTA is already facing a $10 billion deficit in its capital plan through 2014, those cuts could be devastating.

An MTA spokesperson told us that Mica’s plan, which is only an outline at this point, does not contain enough detail to assess the exact impact on the agency and transit riders. “While we support his efforts to promote efficiency, we are concerned about the level of funding that he intends to include in his legislation,” he continued.

New York representatives blasted the proposal. “We are extremely concerned about what a 34 percent cut would mean for all of New York’s needs,” a spokesperson for Rep. Jerry Nadler told Streetsblog. “This would be devastating when we’re already struggling to stay afloat with the resources already available.”

Nadler’s office also pointed out that Mica proposes increasing the share of transit funds that go to suburban and rural areas, as well as to the elderly, disabled and transit-dependent. Said Nadler’s spokesperson: “Given that the funding levels are cut, they can probably only accomplish this by taking money from the other transit programs that benefit urban areas like Rail Modernization. This is really bad for NYC/MTA and other cities with older subway systems (e.g. Boston, Chicago).”

Sen. Chuck Schumer responded to the Republican proposal over Twitter. “Rep Mica plan to cut infrastructure is job-killing, future-suffocating, pessimistic vision of US as ‘can’t do’ nation,” he wrote.

Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand focused on the economic impact of the Mica plan: “We all agree that we must reduce spending, but the House Republicans are determined to slash all the way to the bone and New York would disproportionally pay the price. Infrastructure investments are vital to New York and America’s economic future. But rather than invest in our future, this misguided House proposal would cut approximately 44,625 jobs in New York State alone, and more than 600,000 nationwide. New Yorkers and organizations from the U.S. Chamber of Commerce to the AFL-CIO agree that this proposal is the wrong direction.”

  • Larry Littlefield

    “Nadler’s office also pointed out that Mica proposes increasing the share of transit funds that go to suburban and rural areas, as well as to the elderly, disabled and transit-dependent. Said Nadler’s spokesperson: “Given that the funding levels are cut, they can probably only accomplish this by taking money from the other transit programs that benefit urban areas like Rail Modernization.”

    Therefore, how about a 100 percent cut in all federal transportation funding?

    “Sen. Chuck Schumer responded to the Republican proposal over Twitter. “Rep Mica plan to cut infrastructure is job-killing, future-suffocating, pessimistic vision of US as ‘can’t do’ nation,” he wrote.”

    It’s your generation Chuck.  You’ve been disinvesting in someone else’s future for 30 years.  Remember the tune “Papa Was A Rolling Stone?”  Was the lyric “and when he died, all he left us was alone?”  Or was it “all he left us was a loan?”  The latter sums up federal policy, and state policy in NY, for years if not decades.

  • Larry Littlefield

    Following up, someone seems to have the idea that “big government” means spending on everyone funded by taxes, while “small government” means spending just on us funded by debt.

    With younger generations and transit-oriented communities not included in the “us,” I want to see that bluff called.  Rather than another compromise for a slightly worse deal rather than a vastly worse deal, with gratitude expected in return.

  • Larry Littlefield

    Following up, someone seems to have the idea that “big government” means spending on everyone funded by taxes, while “small government” means spending just on us funded by debt.

    With younger generations and transit-oriented communities not included in the “us,” I want to see that bluff called.  Rather than another compromise for a slightly worse deal rather than a vastly worse deal, with gratitude expected in return.

  • car free nation

    Didn’t the democrats have 2 years to get this done and adequately fund infrastructure before they lost control of the House? 

  • In Mica’s committee summary document about this bill, it says on the transit page, “Transit operators will have to do more with less.”

    Oh, gee, like they haven’t already been doing that! 

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

Schumer, Labor Leaders Rally to Keep Buses and Trains Running

|
L-r: Senator Chuck Schumer, ATU Vice President Larry Hanley, TWU Local 100 President John Samuelsen, and City Council transportation chair James Vacca. Photo: Ben Fried Senator Chuck Schumer joined a coalition of labor unions and transportation advocates at Penn Station today to call for emergency federal funding for the nation’s transit systems. The rally made […]

New House Jobs Bill Dominated by Direct Aid to Cities

|
Soon after the Senate signed off yesterday on a $150 billion package of tax extenders and unemployment benefits that was promoted as a job-creation measure — a bill that lacked dedicated new funding for transportation — Democrats on the House education and labor committee were releasing their own jobs legislation. The House proposal also lacks […]